Possibly 12 by the time the first F35C test bed would be delivered, since up to 12 Fleet Air Arm pilots reportedly already are by months in the US training on F18.
A parliamentary answer dating back to 2009 saw the minister stating that UK pilots in the US already back then were flying on F18 on exchange programmes.
And the F35 test aircraft won’t come before 2012 or perhaps 2013.And we don’t even know how long it’ll be still before the F35C starts going on carriers and thus CATOBAR. So far, it flies from normal runways, as a very normal plane. Can’t be that one the problem.
But are any of them experienced enough to run a test program? You can’t learn how the trap the thing one day and start flight testing it the next.
And how many many experienced CATOBAR pilots does the UK currently have to help test the F-35C? The UK has the expertise to help test the A or the B.
Oh, well. After all, there’s not much in terms of recent news, unfortunately. Even the ACA website has not been updated yet about the change, for example…
And the UK has still a 119 million dollars F35B LRIP IV on order. XD Mr Foxie, wake up! What the hell are you gonna do with that?
Its a test program aircraft that will never leave pax river.
EADS Europe would have zero chance of winning this contract.
A KC-787 might be a great aircraft, but how many years is that going to take? Not sure that the USAF could wait that long.
They can hardly afford the delay that all the legal wrangling has forced.
Hardly, plus the Navy has been recently been talking about a replacement for the C-2 COD. This may just push the process along.:D
The discussion is whether the Osprey can do it which has about the same internal cargo capabilities as the C-2 plus VERTREP capabilities.
So basically the containers were designed without taking NAVAIR’s needs into account. Typical Air Force.
Because while both IAC-1/Viky and IAC-2 will have arresting gear, the launch modes are very different.
Mig-29K cannot be launched from a catapult… it needs a “ski jump” to launch with a functional payload.
That remains to be seen. The MiG-29K prototype was designed with catapult attachment points for use on Ulyanovsk, but when the soviet union fell and the big carriers were scrapped they were never tested.
I wonder what the issue is. The F135 is 220×51 compared to the TF30 which is 242×49. They never seemed to have any problems keeping the tomcats supplied with engines.
They should have though about that before they tried screwing over the tax payer with their self written no-bid lease deal (which was for way less aircraft than than the current contract). I have no sympathy. Right not its either they accept half a contract or nobody gets any aircraft and 50 year old KC-135s start falling out of the skies.
If they ever want to get planes in the air. Its the only way to end it. Neither will be happy, but they most likely won’t be willing to sue and risk their half of the order. Too much of a mess to do anything else. Its already been up for 8 years.
Why not just sell the unwanted CVF to French navy for replacing the expensive PA2 project, or to the Italian navy for replacing the Giuseppe Garibaldi ?
It takes Jobs away from French and Italian workers.
They didn’t design IAC-1, Italian firm Fincantieri did based on a heavily modified version of the cavour class hull.
Well, France wants a second Carrier (PA-2) and India wants a Larger IAC. Then consider the UK has the CVF and is in need of a Partner(s).
Really, a no brainer…….
Yes, it would make sense to license either the CVF or PA2 design for IAC-2.
There’s no way in hell, we’re sending out carriers with only three squadrons.