guys after some reading on google i was wondering which is the best SSK tilll date including weaponery.
1> Amur :diablo:
2> U214
3> Scorpene
4> Collins
5> Gotland Class SSK.can anyone gimme a idea on these subs ?
btw pakistan is getting the Uboats “U214” what are the efefctive countermeasures against this sub sneaking the carrier group? … Did india signed deal for Amurs yet? and how amur versus U214 stands?
Why exclude the U212?
Here is an enlargement of the mystery object in the sky.
It is probably a bird, or perhaps two birds? In any event, it does look a bit peculiar….but there is always an explanation.
It would be interesting if the ramjet AMRAAM came in completely compatible with all current AIM-120 users- and cheaper than Meteor.
More frequently updated than Meteor as well. Like all European missile programs to date, Meteor no doubt will be underfunded by the original partner nations after its initial service introduction.
Its not about defending the airspace against enemy fighter bombers. Its all about air policing, i.e. escorting lost airliners, intercepting German Cessnas without radio contact and to make some nice photos of unannounced US F-16s 😉
In the era of GPS, is there any such thing as “lost airliners?”
Assume for a moment that there were no fighters for “intercepting German Cessnas without radio contact?” Would the Austrian people be less safe?
And probably to keep a core capability so a real air force can be set up faster in emergencies.
It is almost impossible to invision an Intra-European “emergency” that would require Austria to field a “real air force.”
Coastal shipping has been touted as part of the solution to road congestion in the UK for years, but the road lobby is strong and despite high profile statements to the contrarary there seems little real political will to really end our dependence on roads. Sad.
I really don’t see any signs of a victory for the “road lobby.” The UK has some of the worst maintained, most traffic clogged highways in Europe. Petrol and diesel prices are tremendously high – even by European standards – due solely to taxation, and despite the fact that the UK is a major oil producer. Then there is the 10 pound toll for even enteriing London….
The reality is that the “road” and motorist lobby has been losing in the UK for decades. An even sadder reality is that the UK’s public transport system is old, filthy, overpriced, slow at the best of times and delay prone due to equipment and labor issues. I really pity the people who have to depend on British trains and buses for their daily transportation.
Coastal shipping won’t meaningfully improve the transportation situation for the average Britain, but millions in taxpayers money will be spent on environmentally dubious dredging and port improvement projects. More importantly, it will swell the ranks of the dwindling dockworker’s unions. After all, there is a reason why they called it the Labor Party.
Inland and coastal navigation isn’t the solution to the UK’s transport woes. In the ports, container handling will still be managed by overpaid and militant dockworkers union members. This problem is common to the entire developed world.
The fundimental problem is the UK hasn’t had an active or fully funded transport policy since before the Thatcher era. Highway use has exploded during the last two and a half decades, but there hasn’t been a coresponding expenditure on infrastructure. In truth, container carrying trucks aren’t clogging Britains roads. Private cars are the real culprit for gridlock. Despite the best efforts of governments to tax automobile use beyond the means of the average citizen, the British people refuse to be deprived of their automobiles. Until the expansion of the motorway network is restarted, the problem of roadway overuse will never be solved in the UK.
It doesn’t help that the UK’s railways carry an abnormally small fraction of freight. Before privatization, British Railways did nothing to attract new freight business and followed a business model that concentrated on the unprofitable passenger business – and privatization didn’t turn around Britain’s railway system. In contrast, private railroads in the United States concentrated on the cheap and efficient shipment of containers – and got entirely out of the passenger business. Today American freight railroads are immensely profitable – and their bread and butter is the container business.
In the United States, inland and coastal navigation has its role, but typically only for the shipment of bulk commodities, not containerized freight.
The USAF deserves credit for bringing the SDB into service so quickly. This low collatoral damage weapon will have a huge impact on current anti-terror operations.
If you can literally take out a hardened bunker under a civilian house, while leaving adjacent houses completely untouched, terrorists lose the ability to hide in urban areas. With this sort of capability you can loosen the rules of engagement.
This is the type of weapon that Israel should have had during the latest campaign in Lebanon.
If the Austrians do overturn the Typhoon order (which might not happen considering the penalties they would have to pay) I can see the surplus Gripen A in Sweden as being very tempting if they can afford them after the penalty payments. If Typhoon dosen’t go through and any penalties have been paid I can see the F-5 lease being extended or even changed to an outright purchase.
This sounds reasonable to me.
Bofors 57mm for sure. The more I look at that project, the more it looks like an enlarged form of Visby
The “stealth” mounting for the Bofors 57mm on the Visby doesn’t look anything like the arrangement on this Schelde/Thales concept. However, the mouting on the American DDX is entirely different, at least externally. In fact, the 57mm gun housings on the Zumwalt will look very much like scaled down version of the 155mm AGS. Of course, they aren’t identicle in appearance to this Schelde concept, as they are free standing.
Of course, none of this changes the fact that the Schelde “Combatant 12717” has a tumblehome bow, and all of the enlarged Visby proposals are conventional in this regard. Any resemblance to the Visby is very slight.
There is a Swedish enlarged version too called Visby Plus. I’ll send you a document about the current Visby and the Visby plus.
The brochure that I have only has a silhouette of the frigate sized Visby plus.
Well, they used their Drakens a lot in the 1990s (i.e. after the end of the Cold War) to intercept illegal US overflights (F-16s, F-15s, etc) & take photos of them to back up diplomatic protests – and get apologies.
New Zealand isn’t on anyones short-cut routes: Austria is, & its airspace has been prone to incursions as a result. The Austrians find that annoying, as would anyone.
Who really cares if a NATO fighter jock strays into the airspace of neutral Austria? Let the diplomats protest – at least it will give them something to do.
Austria really doesn’t have anything to defend against? I mean seriously, who is going to invade?
Any possible threat is still decades away, and the already dated Eurofighter would hardly be much of a deterrent against a renewed Russian threat in 20 or 30 years time.
Neutrality has to be defended and that not only on the ground. Souvereignity doesn’t end 1 m above the ground. Fighters are a necessity for security especially since september 11th 2001. An fighters are used for much more than intercepting hostile military aircraft…
What is Austria defending against? Austria is literally surrounded by NATO, in the middle of a Europe that is at peace.
I think I know which one you mean Wanshan. the small one had a Mk48 VLS, a Goalkeeper in the back and 2 quadruple Harpoon launchers. Many people complained about its “yacht-like appearance” and that it didn’t look like a warship anymore. I admit it did have a dingy in the back and the hull shape of a yacht. But all together I think it was an excellent ship!
This is all news to me. Do you have an pictures or drawings?
Don’t know if anybody noticed but many – if not most – larger navy combattant vessels have 2 search radar sets. It is not a matter solely of redundancy but also of different function.
You typically see a high powered 2d search radar and a lower powered 3d targeting radar.
This is reflected in the choice of radars on that modified Udaloy (carrying MAE3 and MAE4K)
http://www.milparade.com/catalog/pdf/570-571.pdf#search=%22Fregat%20%22MAE%204K%22%20%22
Hmmm….MAE3 is E band…..and MAE4K is H band….all is made clear.