No, I believe that was among the surprise findings. I believe this airplane is the one (or part of) now restored in Italy. I was not around when it was recovered, but was told that being under a larger aircraft at least protected it from the elements.
For cultural archaeology, yes. For aviation archaeology, not so much, especially after all the wrecks have been removed from Afghanistan’s airports, although there was the wonderful find of the Italian pre-war Ro 37 biplane that had been squashed UNDER a MiG-15 in the lowest level of the Kabul dump.
I think you might like THE DECISIVE DUEL: SPITFIRE Vs 109, a “dual biography” of the two classic Second World War fighter aircraft. It is published by Little, Brown and is available at bookstores throughout the UK and from Amazon.
I wrote this book to appeal to a broad audience (and offer it as an alternative to the necktie for holiday giving) but I believe that even a hard-core enthusiast will learn something new.
David Isby
“We already reduced the number of military posts from 23,000 to 7,500, and eventually around 300 should remain.” That’s a quote from Russian defense minister Aleksandr Serdyukov in an Itogi Online interview on 10 October.
Whatever this means for Russian defense policy, it likely means a mass scrapping of gate guardians and, more important, all the interesting stuff that has been in crates or hangars since 1945.
Much as I admire our Russian friends pulling aircraft out of lakes, pulling them out of the grip of their own defense ministry may be more important.
Colour profiles can be found in:
David Isby, C-47 and R4D Units of the ET0/MTO, published by Osprey in their line of monographs.
Yes. That is the normal use of the term in training. The other is reported as “accident rate”.
Source on USAF 1950s training policy and aircraft:
Ann Krueger Hussey, Air Force Flight Screening: Evolutionary Changes, 1917-2003, Office of History and Research, Headquarters Air Education and Training Command, Randolph AFB, Texas, December 2004. Attrition rates table on p. 6.
Available on the Web: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a476370.pdf
I believe at that time the USAF usually used T-6s as trainers ab initio. Which contributed to attrition rates.
I believe at that time the USAF usually used T-6s as trainers ab initio. Which contributed to attrition rates.
I think that a natural location for secret collections is Russia. I was told, some 30 years ago, by someone who claimed to know, about a Soviet reserve collection that included one each of german and lend-lease aircraft, including an Armstrong Whitworth Albemarle that supposedly was seen when they were moving things around in a hangar.
I think that a natural location for secret collections is Russia. I was told, some 30 years ago, by someone who claimed to know, about a Soviet reserve collection that included one each of german and lend-lease aircraft, including an Armstrong Whitworth Albemarle that supposedly was seen when they were moving things around in a hangar.
A touche-and-go, obviously.
Hurrah! I shall certainly get my copy.
By the way, has anyone ever identified the three Royal Navy destroyers where Cazenove was “told to f— off” by the Navy, leaving him to pick up a discarded rifle and join the final defenders of Calais?
New Spitfire and Bf 109 “dual biography” on Amazon
Coming soon!
The Decisive Dual:
Spitfire vs. 109
A “dual biography” of the two great fighters, published by Little Brown.
by David Isby
Amazon is currently taking orders at ten quid and change a copy, which is a great deal for a 500-page hardback. (Cheaper than my books that Osprey publish).
Is there a secret store of aircraft somewhere in Russia? With the Russians closing down many of their airbases and concentrating operations, one hopes that anything that has been in the back of a hangar since 1945 that comes to light is preserved.