dark light

l.garey

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,516 through 1,530 (of 1,836 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Eon Olympia VV400 BGA No 1697 #1148756
    l.garey
    Participant

    In Jane’s World Sailplanes and Motor Gliders by Andrew Coates (1978; Macdonalds and Jane’s Publishers. London) there is a nice photo of VV400 with number “60” under the wing and (presumably) on the tail. There is also “Empire Test Pilots School” on the nose. Photo credit is to Cyril Peckham. I hope it is OK for me to copy it and paste it below.

    Laurence

    http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc39/apollo-fox/vv400.jpg

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1151592
    l.garey
    Participant

    Yes, I’m stumped!

    Laurence

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1152572
    l.garey
    Participant

    Some early Schweizers had that shape fin. 1-21. I must stop guessing though.

    Laurence

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1152581
    l.garey
    Participant

    Maybe a Kite?

    Laurence

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1152589
    l.garey
    Participant

    Lovely aircraft, Eric. I agree, the nose looks wrong for a Sky: all those stringers, but the fin and rudder look Sky-like!

    Laurence

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1152600
    l.garey
    Participant

    Slingsby Sky

    Laurence

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1153848
    l.garey
    Participant

    Kaproni Bulgarski, as they say!

    Laurence

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1154006
    l.garey
    Participant

    I don’t think the Ca309 had all that cabin glazing. Could it be the Ca306 or 308?

    Laurence

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1158957
    l.garey
    Participant

    Not a lack of interest: just a lack of knowledge

    Laurence

    in reply to: Nasa Harriers #1092140
    l.garey
    Participant

    Identity of NASA521

    I thought I had a photo of NASA521 which I took in a visit to the Smithsonian in 1986, but cannot find it. When I returned to the Smithsonian in 2008, the Kestrel was no longer on display. So I cannot help with pictures.

    However maybe someone can enlighten me about the following. NASA 521 was ex XS689, 64-18262 fuselage with (according to the catalogue) XS694 wings, but it wore XS688 under the wings.

    I looked back at the thread “Harriers in Museums” http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=51123&page=5
    where it is also stated that NASA521 has XS694 wings, but why did they have XS688 on them? XS688 is stated to be in the USAF Museum.

    Laurence

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1095038
    l.garey
    Participant

    Is that Kronfeld sitting in there?

    Laurence

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1095114
    l.garey
    Participant

    I had noticed that, Pagen, so just wanted to be sure that we are not sticking strictly to Mr Creosote’s initial remit. I think it essential to be flexible. That was why I suggested having some “easy” ones with a few “where and when” questions when there was some doubt about the thread getting too obstruse. But see how easy my SM79 was today!

    Laurence

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1095127
    l.garey
    Participant

    That was quick Eric. This is one of the photos of the “graveyard” at Benghazi which Tony gave me and I published on my site. My notes there are:

    Two views of an interesting SM79. This is not the usual hunchbacked bomber version, but an SM79T “Atlantici” of which three were used on the famous flight from Rome to Rio in January 1938. The wording on the fuselage is:
    ALA LITTORIA S.A. LINEE ATLANTICHE
    This is probably I-ALAN, used for regular flights between Italy and Brazil, mostly for mail. In May-June 1940 it was impressed in military service, still in civil markings, for flights in the Mediterranean area and to Abyssinia. On July 16 1940, en route to Abyssinia, it aborted take off at Benghazi and the undercarriage collapsed. British troops found the wreck in February 1941.

    Over to you

    Laurence

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1095148
    l.garey
    Participant

    To add some variety, as we discussed a couple of weeks ago, even for very easy pictures:
    Referring to the big one in the foreground, can you identify the type (easy), the actual aircraft (maybe a bit harder), when and where? And why was it there then?

    Laurence

    http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc39/apollo-fox/wotplane6.jpg

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1095163
    l.garey
    Participant

    DOWA 81 (escape plane!)
    It never flew, and we said at the start of this competition that the subjects must have flown. Never mind!
    I quote from post 1:
    Only manned aircraft that have actually flown since 1939.
    Do we still stick to this?

    Laurence

Viewing 15 posts - 1,516 through 1,530 (of 1,836 total)