dark light

l.garey

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 1,836 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: I am even more confused than… #796465
    l.garey
    Participant

    I am even more confused than usual. We were just getting used to Khalem and his promises to do better, and now we have information coming in from jamesm, member for some nearly 3 years with 74 posts, even if he can’t copy and paste important updates without screwing up. Who is he and who is our contact at Key?

    Laurence

    in reply to: Spam on this site. #796468
    l.garey
    Participant

    Better admin? Are the admins still enabled then?

    Laurence

    in reply to: Spam on this site. #796597
    l.garey
    Participant

    Be careful about the post above saying Please see update. It appears on several thread I have just looked at and doesn’t work anyway.

    Laurence

    in reply to: It say Please see update,… #796600
    l.garey
    Participant

    It say Please see update, but it doesn’t work

    Laurence

    in reply to: It looks as if we suddenly… #796602
    l.garey
    Participant

    It looks as if we suddenly jumped from 1 November to 6 November. What happened to the posts in between? It says “see update”, but if you click that you get “10,000” irrelevant results. Oh dear.

    Laurence

    in reply to: Search and you will find,… #797080
    l.garey
    Participant

    Search and you will find, but what you find will tend to be a paying subscription to Key for something you dont want. I have tried simply Googling the title of the thread I want: that sometimes works for a shortish thread, but it’s not what you can call a search function. That went out the window a month ago along with all the other missing functions.

    Laurence

    in reply to: A-W Meteor NF.14 WS788 Restoration Thread #797335
    l.garey
    Participant

    Thank you Blue. You are living proof that you CAN survive Key’s attack on the site. Of course, it’s “their” site, but without us it would not be here. And you are proof of that pudding. Also, congratulations for overcoming the problem of embedding your pictures in the text. Wonderful stuff.

    Laurence

    in reply to: J Boyle: I guess I'm another… #797600
    l.garey
    Participant

    J Boyle: I guess I’m another of the old ones. My first show was at Upwood in September 1952. I think it was already called the Battle of Britain Display. In those days the field was scattered with Lincolns of 7 and 214 Squadrons, but there were a few other representative types from those still just post-war days. Other  bombers included a Washington, a Mosquito and a very exciting early Canberra B2, while the fighters were a Meteor F4 and F8. The station flight showed off its Oxford. Three Tiger Moths, a Harvard, a Proctor, a Chipmunk, an Anson and a Varsity rounded it off. Notably, for a front-line bomber station, a few civil aircraft had been allowed in, a couple of Austers and a Gemini. Very quiet and sedate compared with modern shows, but exciting for an eleven-year-old.

    Little did I realise then that a couple of years later, as an ATC cadet, I would be flying in those Lincolns and that lovely Oxford thanks to our wonderful liaison officer, F/L JB Stephens of 7 Squadron. Fantastic memories, and a red letter day in my fast growing passion for aviation.

    Laurence

    in reply to: Bob: Thanks for the link to… #797608
    l.garey
    Participant

    Bob: Thanks for the link to the Key archive. Most useful.

    Edited: PS. After trying several it looks as if threads are inaccessible. Maybe it’s just me but I fear the worst. Mothminor seems to find the same.

    Laurence

    in reply to: Duxford Diary: Thankyou and Goodbye. #797692
    l.garey
    Participant

    So this is the result of Key’s unannounced and unwanted vandalism. OK, it’s “their” thread, but it wouldn’t exist without its contributors and readers. Duxford Diary was (and still IS in its new site) one of the top contributions (along with several others, such was the wealth of the old Key thread). Now we can’t even find our way around it nor can we conveniently access valued old material. It’s a real shame, but I would echo several people in asking why you cannot simply reverse your decision and go back to the original format. I thought I would be able to count on replies to my various specific points I have made on several threads, but no, nothing except, “We’re working on it”. Sad.

    Laurence

    in reply to: I wonder if there is any way… #797934
    l.garey
    Participant

    I wonder if there is any way to “see” the old forum as it was when it got chopped. Or has it gone for ever off into the aether? Any software experts who could comment?

    Laurence

    in reply to: RAF Halton – late 1950's – Images for Steve Bond. #797946
    l.garey
    Participant

    This is an obvious example of a thread that used to be full of photographic evidence of the utmost importance to us sincere historians. Where have all the pictures gone, to misquote Pete Seeger? And even the numbers of the posts?

    Please do something.

    Laurence

    in reply to: GliderSpit said yesterday:
    #797948
    l.garey
    Participant

    GliderSpit said yesterday:

    When you see the number of years that members have been here and the number of posts they made, it’s a real shame that there’s hardly any reply from Key to the feedback given here.

    As I have said a couple of times already my years and posts count does not change. Is this a specific punishment for me or have others noticed the same thing? It’s not so important, compared with the other numerous complaints, but it’s just another sign of the decline of the site.

    I see Khalem is back this morning, still saying he is “expecting an update soon”, but why is it taking so long? I hope not simply waiting for us to get used to the downturn.

    Laurence

    in reply to: Khalem: so why isn't the… #798262
    l.garey
    Participant

    Khalem: so why isn’t the thread being reinstated? Where is it?

    Laurence

     

    in reply to: More woes. Maybe it's been… #798827
    l.garey
    Participant

    More woes. Maybe it’s been pointed out already, but I only saw it just now: if you manage to find an old thread in which there were pictures in the body (not just links) there are no pictures any more. 

    Laurence

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 1,836 total)