dark light

l.garey

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 1,836 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Avro Lancaster B.VI Info? #885532
    l.garey
    Participant

    Isn’t that the Tyne Lincoln in 1956? I recall seeing it there. I still have a photo I took of that flyxpast on one engine.

    in reply to: Stencil on early Mann Egerton aircraft #898227
    l.garey
    Participant

    I’m going to answer my own question, as I have managed to blow up the IWM photo enough to read: MANN EGERTON & CO LTD, AIRCRAFT WORKS, NORWICH, ENGLAND. I’ll leave the post on though in case it is of interest to anyone, or in case I made a mistake (eg in the “& CO LTD bit).

    in reply to: P-47's with German drop tanks #898339
    l.garey
    Participant

    It also says: “Sofort bei nächste …” (Immediately on next …). So it was intended for reuse!

    in reply to: Two-pilot operations in Wellingtons #899766
    l.garey
    Participant

    Thanks for the further information.

    in reply to: Two-pilot operations in Wellingtons #900169
    l.garey
    Participant

    Thanks for the picture, Dr S. Thanks Graham for the information. So, I presume that even if a second pilot was carried on Wellington operations, he would not have had dual controls. Would he even have a right hand seat? I have been looking at the ORBs for 75 Squadron for 1940-1941 and just about every flight was 6-man: captain, second pilot, WO, Nav and two gunners.

    in reply to: Desert Air Force Survivors #902660
    l.garey
    Participant

    Malcolm: A long story, dealt with over several threads. Briefly, the Italian team found some human bones about 8km from the wreck site. I arranged with our local forensic scientists to analyse these bones (DNA and histology), but we were never able to recover them. The MoD said at one stage that they had been examined in Cairo and found “unsuitable” for analysis. There was also mention of a “second set” of bones. Both these assertions seem rather doubtful, and now everything seems to have disappeared. I don’t know where these bones are now, and I don’t know anyone who knows. Still shrouded in mystery.

    in reply to: Bremen Memorial #907472
    l.garey
    Participant

    Thanks for posting that Sabrejet. As J Boyle says there have been a number of highlighted accidents concerning sports teams. One that seems not to have been so well publicised, perhaps because not featuring an internationally famous team, was that involving Valetta WJ474 on 6 January 1954 at Aldbury on route from Bovingdon to Thorney Island with an RAF rugby team. Sixteen died, and the one survivor was later my flying instructor.

    in reply to: 80 Spitfires? #908074
    l.garey
    Participant

    Mk XIV SG-31 at Beauvechain in July 1959 before recovery as RN201.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]244740[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]244741[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Vintage jet display photos #909764
    l.garey
    Participant

    merlin70: your photo is of the two prototype Vulcans (VX770 and 777) with the four Avro 707s in 1953. Nice picture too. Mine is of two operational Vulcans (note the kinked leading edges). According to Scramble they were probably XA904 and 906, and the Valiants XD822 and 868.

    in reply to: Vintage jet display photos #910353
    l.garey
    Participant

    Nice photos! Here’s one of mine, this time with 4 V-bombers, although only 2 types- Farnborough 1957. Usual apology for poor quality, but due to my cheap equipment at the time.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]244688[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: An interesting individual #917496
    l.garey
    Participant

    Quite a story. And he lived to be 92.

    in reply to: Swiss Vampire J1649 #921749
    l.garey
    Participant

    Darren: J-1649 is a Venom: I was referring to my old post on J-1105, as quoted. Sorry for any confusion!

    in reply to: Swiss Vampire J1649 #922088
    l.garey
    Participant

    Not a Venom (as in the text), but a Swiss Vampire (as in the title) boom that I posted in 2013:
    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?125774-Swiss-Vampire-J-1105&highlight=roche

    in reply to: Help Needed to ID Beauforts and Beaufighters #923883
    l.garey
    Participant

    Reevers: so was it 7601 not 1701, or were there 2 marked A-19?

    D1566: I can’t see T3229 in the list of RAF-serialled Beaufighters on http://www.adf-serials.com.au/beaufighter.htm
    Just Googling “Beaufighter T3229” gives me ditched off Lisbon or captured at Casablanca 1.5.41. Which is correct I wonder!

    in reply to: Help Needed to ID Beauforts and Beaufighters #924108
    l.garey
    Participant

    A19 was the serial series for RAAF Beaufighters, but 1701 seems too high.

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 1,836 total)