dark light

l.garey

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 1,836 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lancaster recovery in Normandy #977645
    l.garey
    Participant

    Sorry Peter. Similarities were mooted about the P-40 and the Lancaster affairs, which made it necessary to refer to both in a single thread. The fact that two threads about the P-40 were deleted did not help matters! Will either ever be reinstated?

    in reply to: Lancaster recovery in Normandy #977746
    l.garey
    Participant

    My remark about qattara was that he WAS on site. The Italian team seems to have been to the P-40 before the Poles.
    I have no problem with “newbies”: we were all that at some time. Indeed, one usually joins this sort of forum to give useful information (or gain some information). What is a pain is when a “newbie” appears one day, posts twice with seemingly useful information, then disappears.
    Also, the pulling of threads is not very helpful in our trying to keep a chronological record of what actually happened and was said.

    in reply to: Lancaster recovery in Normandy #977767
    l.garey
    Participant

    Neither of the Planes or crew are on British soil, and none of the posters on either threads were on site.

    In both instances a poster unknown to the forum appeared claiming first hand knowledge, which was accepted at face value (at first) then because of the absence of any further posting by the newbie poster, unanswered questions started to collect up like uncollected refuse sacks, and the questioning turned on the newbie Poster(s) and the veracity of their claims.

    As both of these sagas are on going it is impossible to say exactly what the final conclusion will be; are the bones found Coppings? where are the remains of the Lancaster’s crew?

    It is not quite correct to say that none of the posters “were on site”. For the P-40 qattara was in the team that apparently discovered the wreck, and he certainly is not guilty of “absence of any further posting”. He was, and is, actively involved.

    As to the Lancaster, Jackflash’s claims were hardly “accepted at face value”. He indeed disappeared, much to our regret, without answering our questions.

    We would very much like to be able to answer your questions about the crews’ remains.

    in reply to: Lancaster recovery in Normandy #978067
    l.garey
    Participant

    A Rolling Stone gathers no moss.

    Seriously though, this whole scandalous affair must not be forgotten. I am trying to follow it up with people locally.

    in reply to: Lancaster recovery in Normandy #978078
    l.garey
    Participant

    I just checked the members’ list and cannot find Jackflash. He or she stills appears in the statistics as joining on 7 October, posting twice, then not seen since 8 October.
    Merely a flash in the pan?

    in reply to: Spotters of the 1960's… #978129
    l.garey
    Participant

    I was not at Farnborough in 1956 or 1958. The next one I attended after 1957 was 1961. So I still stick to 1957 for my photos. What year did the Tyne-Lincoln do its low passes?

    in reply to: Spotters of the 1960's… #978817
    l.garey
    Participant

    Jim:
    I have just checked my original logbook and the entries are definitely from 8 September 1957. I must find the original prints of the photos to be sure they ARE 1957, but I was not there in 1956. VW218 does not look that different from your picture, but Varsities WF381 and WL667 were there too, so maybe the spare fuselage was one of those. Others that day were Pembroke WV710, Venom WE471, Swift WK194 and Vulcan XA906

    in reply to: Spotters of the 1960's… #979033
    l.garey
    Participant

    Gems that weren’t usually available were the Wellington T.4 and Hawker Hind, in Afghan colours.

    Was that the T10 MF628 which I first saw at Bicester from January to March 1961 with the Exhibition Flight there?

    in reply to: Spotters of the 1960's… #979035
    l.garey
    Participant

    PS:Are there any more Farnborough pics out there?

    A few boyhood Farnborough snaps. September 1957

    http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc39/apollo-fox/VX828Fboroa.jpg

    http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc39/apollo-fox/VX828Fboro2a.jpg

    http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc39/apollo-fox/epts001a.jpg

    VX828 Varsity prototype
    Devon VP966 or XA879 (both were there)
    NF11 WD765 or 769 (both were there)
    Viking VW218 (I think)
    Gannet T(?2)
    Britannia in tank
    Unidentified Hunter

    If you can make positive identification of the dodgy ones, I should be grateful.

    in reply to: Spotters of the 1960's… #979651
    l.garey
    Participant

    I wish I’d known that Avenger was there in 1957 Laurence!
    Is it possible to tell the mark from your photos I wonder?
    Jim

    Thanks for the comment Jim. I can’t tell, but not one of the later AS4s I think.

    in reply to: Spotters of the 1960's… #980214
    l.garey
    Participant

    When I was in the Air Training Corps in the 1950s, a regular outing was to the SBAC show at Farnborough. Apart from the show itself, I enjoyed walking past the site of the ETPS and the other active units. There were always rare, prototype and abandoned aircraft of all sorts. These 2 were taken, I think, in September 1957. They show an abandoned Grumman Avenger, but I have no record of a visible serial. It could be KE436 which went to the RAE in 1947 and was withdrawn there in 1953. The engine was removed in 1954, so this could be it.

    http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc39/apollo-fox/Avenger2a.jpg

    http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc39/apollo-fox/Avenger1-2.jpg

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #984173
    l.garey
    Participant

    I agree Andy. Is the MOD in the 19th century? How can they say that without microscopy and DNA, as we have said so often?

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #994630
    l.garey
    Participant

    Yes, keep up the pressure so that we may finally get some material for analysis, such as the family really would like to have.

    in reply to: London Airport in the 1950s #994639
    l.garey
    Participant

    I seem to remember the spectators’ enclosure like that, being almost able to touch the passing aircraft on the taxiway. Compare the photo I already published, and here it is again:

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread Mk2 #997762
    l.garey
    Participant

    Did you say, “Begin to ease back on the stick”?

    Chipmunk on detachment from 7AEF for the World Gliding Championships at South Cerney 1965. Overrun by the glider it was towing and written off 11 June 1965. Both occupants unharmed!
    via Martin Pengelly, Facebook

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 1,836 total)