That’s a bit abstract. Looks likes a motorcycle exhaust to me.
IAR-99, but number 702, so try PC7 x 9

Lausanne 2011
Good morning Walter. I was not able to get any information about the PL-2 when I was in Karachi. There is a reference in a forum
http://www.defence.pk/forums/pakistan-air-force/90093-paf-rare-birds-4.html
but is doesn’t help much. The one at the PAF museum looks very rough in terms of finish and has no markings to identify it, although it does carry PAF roundels and fin flash (which I masked).
Thanks Canuck!
Re the Pazmany: I just looked at the “composites” page http://www.idaircraft.com/composite/
again, and see they are using MY photo, unacknowledged!
Cheeky!
OK. There is not much difference between them. Mainly cockpit size I think. “Mine” is also illustrated on the page you cited, but labelled PL1 there. However, I took this picture at Karachi, where it is labelled PL2!
Anyway, over to you.
Not quite, but nearly!
Try this one

Nines? How about 9 x G91?

Biggin 1968
Thanks Canuck. Is it is fact the Posey Brothers’ one at Trenton?
http://poseybrothers.com/pa18.shtml
I think it might be the autogyro I saw in a photo with Jean Harlow posing in front, but I don’t know its name.
A Pitcairn? There was a PA-18 around relatively recently.
http://cablecarguy.blogspot.com/2011/11/autogyro-november-1-2011.html
Yes, I go for the PA-18,
Is it this one?
http://poseybrothers.com/pa18.shtml
Canuck: is THAT the next challenge?
Or a PC9 (at Geneva Classics 2009)

Tangmere asked on 29 January:
It would be helpful if any other viewers to this thread could input with their knowledge or experience in this area so as to build up a picture of what the true position is.
I have had 2 experiences of the AHB recently.
The latest (January 2012) was an enquiry about a pilot whom I knew in the 1960s, and whose trace I have lost. The reply was, probably fair enough, that they did not hold information about him during or after his service with the RAF. They explained that it was possible that his Record of Service could be available at Cranwell. The argument was that the MOD had responsibility for the custody of Records of Service which were not already in the public domain. Whilst an individual is still alive only that person may obtain information on their Record of Service. If deceased, the MOD’s duty is to “ensure that information is not disclosed if there is even the slightest risk that this would undermine” trust with families. Applicants who are not immediate next of kin may obtain a summary of the Record of Service when the subject is known to be deceased. The consent of next of kin may have to be obtained. A fee of £30 is payable.
That seems more or less OK to me.
The other case (September 2011) was my enquiry about a Wellington which crashed in the Middle East in 1943, and I asked, by email, five numbered questions about the mission, the circumstances and two of the people involved, one of whom died. All five questions received well documented answers.
The same officer signed both letters of reply.
So, I cannot grumble at the service I obtained.
Thanks Bruce, but it still says “Bristol”
Ollie: do you mean Brewster Bermuda? Known as Buccaneer in the US (as wieesso says, above). Changing the title would make it easier to find in the future.
Didn’t spot it until you said; title changed; Bruce