It is a Yak-15 – the Yak-15-RD10 development aircraft – with redesigned wings and tail.
The laminar-flow wings were too thin for the U/C – hence it was also redesigned.
Only one was built.
Ok I apologise. It’s better for me if a Yak-15 picture is the one of a production aircraft. It looks nicer… but not as nice as the Flora :p
Yak-15
This cannot be a Yak-15. It had gear legs wide appart like in the piston-engined Yaks. Unfortunately all my documentation is unavailable at this time so I can’t say what aircraft this is.
Personally I love the Yak-23 (and its NATO name). It looks like a racer plane to me.
This is just a rumour – read this book.
I enjoyed Jyrki Laukkanen’s book a lot. Beautiful pictures, interesting story of the training of the Finnish pilots, description of flight in a MiG-15UTI and in a MiG-21. Interesting to the techies and to the historians are the same time. Highly recommended !
I have a problem identifying the version of certain MiG-21s.
– single-piece canopy, narrow chord fin, parachute at the fin base -> PFS, right ?
– fixed windscreen, wide chord fin -> PFM or could be a late PFS ?
There are planes like the one in the Great Patriotic War museum in Kiev that bother me more. Single-piece canopy, wide chord fin, parachute at the fin base but it looks like the flaps aren’t of the blown type. That suggests that it’s an FL version but would have USSR used this version ?
Aaaah finally finished reading it. So. Here’s my review. The chapters are:
1.The origin of the family. 47 pages. Ye-2,-4,-5 and -50 (jet and rocket powered). Some pics of the Ye-50/1 crash and of the pressure suit used (cool fishbowl helmet with a flat pane) have been added since the Aerofax.
2.Off to a fine start. 37 pages. MiG-21F and F-13
3.Interceptors. 32 pages. MiG-21PF, PFS and PFM. Distinguishing a PFS from a PFM may be difficult if Gordon is right but he didn’t care about that in the pictures he puts. Wide chord single piece canopied planes are always ‘early PFMs’…
4.Mass production. 65 pages. R, S, SM, M, MF, bis, upgrades
5.Trainers. 19 pages. U, US, UM.
6.Experiments and projects. 35 pages. Ye-8, Ye-7PD, MiG-21I. Nice quote from Mosolov telling how he almost died because of the terrible Ye-8 engine problems.
7.Beyond the great wall. 91 pages. Refer to Deino’s post.
8.In Soviet Air Force service. 17 pages. Cuban crisies and Afghanistan mostly.
9.MiG-21 at war.43 pages. Keith Dexter may be the author of this chapter as the text is more scholar : brief description of the conflicts, some dates and figures. A lot better than what could be found in the Aerofax or the crappy Warbirdtech.
10.Face to face with adversary. 7 pages. F-5E was evaluated at compared to the MiG-21bis. The Tiger II was better at low speed, nicer to maintain and fly. Nice info about the tendency of single engined twin air intaked jets to suffer from compressor stall.
11.MiG-21 in detail. 41pages. Looks very very similar to the corresponding chapter in the Aerofax book. The size of the intake is still the same between a PF/…/MF and a bis which is wrong according to fellow ARCers that know the MiG-21. Ok ok the difference is just 5cms in diameter… There’s a game included in this chapter: there are plenty of detail pics than are just enlarged part of other photos of the book. Find the original picture in the book !
12.MiG-21 operators. 246 pages. Probably written be Keith Dexter again. The units and what versions were used are described. Nice info about what were MiG-21PFMs, MiG-21SPSs and SPS-Ks in DDR, MiG-21MA in Czechoslovakia, MiG-21RFM in Romania, etc.
Yefim Gordon is more a compiler than a writer. He sometimes (or always ?) forgets to double-check what he writes and he can hardly be called an historian: sources not told, no bibliography or references chapters. The ‘at war’ and ‘operators’ chapters probably have not been written by Gordon and that’s good: I’ve found them to be quite nice !
This book is not for historians and people who spend their life accumulating documentation on the MiG-21.They’ll probably find plenty of incoherences in it, copy/pastes from other documents, the same boring pictures that can be found anywhere else, etc. Ok. But what if the reader knows all these things, that he doesn’t want to accumulate plenty of books and spend all his days in front of the computer ? What if he knows that Yefim Gordon books aren’t always reliable but that he likes to have a big fat MiG-21 book with (often poor quality) pictures of exotic planes ? This reader will probably like the FRA book even if it doesn’t answer all the questions that he may ask himself. I recommend this book.
I still don’t have the book but I had a look at it. The book is structured like any Yefim Gordon book. Vladimir Klimov drawings were used again but they’ve been updated to include the MiG-21-93 for instance. A difference with the Aerofax is that the drawings have been spread inside corresponding paragraphs. There are plenty of technical drawings and profiles. Most of them are new but some were already in the Aerofax: Gordon still recycles when he can… The chapters talking about non-Soviet service didn’t look very impressive but the rest looks nice. The J/F-7 and the prototypes that derived are quite extensively discussed.
I know I’ll be slightly disappointed with the book and I won’t like as much as I liked the ‘MiG-21 in Finnish Air Force’ book by Jyrki Laukkanen. Still it’s undoubtly the best English MiG-21 monography ever written… even though there must be a (small ? huge ?) number of inaccuracies and errors in it.
Ähhhm … so long just to put it on the agaenda again !
HAs anyone seen this “monster” so far or even read ??? … and what’s are Your comments, critics ???
Thanks in advance, Deino :confused:
I haven’t received it yet but I know someone who did. This person is used to researchers/historians: people who crosscheck infos, tell the information sources, all the thing that aren’t always done in Yefim Gordon books. He’s a bit disappointed by the book of course. The quality seems inhomogenous as usual. Some chapters seems to contradict themselves. Versions in the ‘MiG-21 at War’ chapter (inspired by Tom Cooper’s work apparently) are incoherent with the rest of the book. The book isn’t the definitive MiG-21/J-7 reference book (which isn’t surprising at all to me) but it is still worth buying but perhaps not at full retail price. I’m waiting for my copy anyway.
A heads up for you MiG-21 fans……
Have you seen the latest three issues of the Ukrainian aviation magazine, ‘Aviatsiya i Vremya’ (Aviation and Time) ?????
Issue 5/2007 covers the early MiG-21’s – with an A-3 size pull-out set of excellent scale drawings…..
Issue 6/2007 completes the MiG-21 series – again with scale drawings….
Issue 1/2008 completes the series with a look at the Chinese J-7/F-7 – again with scale drawings…..
Ken
Thanks Ken but the problem is getting these magazines at a reasonable price (that includes shipping cost of course).
Ps: Got your old soviet aircraft modeling book. Thinking about publishing a 2nd edition ? 😉
The book will come out mid-summer in this year.
Cool !
Can you open the book?
No. It arrived at Ian Allan on Monday. Since I’m not in the UK I’ll have to wait and see the content of the book (that I haven’t ordered).
How many previously unpublished photos are in?
Any good photos of operational aircrafts of Soviet AF from the 70s 80s at frontline units like – for example – 16.VA.?
Yefim Gordons other MiG-21 related publications were illustrated with very poor, boring photographic materials.
Development photos, and other not too interesting pictures, that you can find anywhere else….
I doubt it but what about the book that was supposed to be published last year for which you were to contribute ?
If that’s true, then how are some few second hand F-16s going to deter nations like Algeria(Su-30, Mig-29)? And why should morrocco consider second hand aircraft alongside brand new Rafales?
Because Algeria’s MiG-29 SMTs are retrofitted old planes too ! :p When Algeria found this out they stopped the delivery.
I’ve read that the F-16 were second-hand.
I know someone who owns the Aerofax and bought the Red Star… he brought back the Red Star and asked for a refund…
Sergei Burdin was working on a book on MiG-25R.
Really ? That would be great. I loved his Tu-22 Blinder book.
Specialtypress.com still lists a September 2007 release date
October 2007 now, still not February 2008.
Thanks MiG-23 MLD ! 😎