I was able to finally figure out the belly pack thing and 500 rounds per gun is indeed what I’m seeing.
A recent reference work I bought said 400 rounds for the wing gun in the IV, so I’d assume it’s the same for all variants.
The more I read about the Blenheim, the more interested I become in it. First off, seeing it fly is always a treat. It’s faster and more agile than you would at first think. An amazing airplane to say the least.
Oh that’s great news about the new book. I bought and read the first volume on the Phantom and it was great! I just finished Javelin from the Cockpit and it was a very enjoyable read.
I suppose it’s lesser known than other RAF types, but I do find it to be an interesting airplane.
Limitations on the number of times in-flight refuelling can be accomplished often involved crew complement of the receiver aircraft more than the aircraft itself. It can be a very challenging task, and very fatiguing especially towards the end of a particularly long flight. It can be a very perishable skill for many although for others it’s just like riding a bike again.
Secondly, as Dragonflyer noted, tanker availability is often an issue. The number of aircraft that require AAR can often exceed the tankers available.
Some fantastic shots! Truly a beautiful family of airplanes.
Gerard, what is the story behind the Herc doing the dirt landing? What country is that one operated by? I was unable to place it.
Two questions:
1. What type of helicopter is that on that ship? (Alouette III?)
2. What type is in the shot from inside the cockpit? (MiG-29?)
All fantastic shots by the way.
Was there to witness the fly-past and it was an awesome sight indeed. Any place that lists which squadrons the aircraft all came from?
That’s quite interesting and I’m glad you decided to share your experience here. It’s the sort of thing I hope to read when I login.
Can you comment much on Firestreaks vs. Red Tops or was it all Firestreak while you were there? I’m not asking necessarily about the performance of one missile vs. the other, but rather just general comments on them and how they were loaded, cared for, etc. Just curious how an MPC would have worked. Thanks!
I went on Saturday, and while I noticed the lower crowd numbers, I still enjoyed the show overall. (I had never seen the Patrouille de France before, and I must say they did not disappoint.)
I am curious though……what prompted the implementation of the advance ticketing policy? Does it pertain to Shoreham or is it something else?
What about the Fitters still in service?
I thought the use of all of the three primary fuselage hardpoints (not counting the one for recce/targeting pods) for AAMs was interesting. I think the JAS-39 is an excellent airplane, and I hope to see it continue to do well on the export market. I look forward to the day I get to see one in person for the first time.
Are those Le Prieur rockets? What type of aircraft is that?
Provided the photographer is correct, and this is a MiG-31BSM (upgraded MiG-31BS to BM standard?), then here is an example of a “BM” with armament although they are apparently the standard R-33 variants. The underwing pylons would seem to indicate this is an upgraded jet wouldn’t they?
Either way a fantastic photo!
Is that last black & white photo of a Skyraider?
As for the F-15, isn’t Boeing working on some long-term upgrade program that gives the F-15 a larger “clip” of AAM’s? I don’t know that anyone has bought it yet, but I think I read about it recently.
I too am confused as to how the U.K. buying P-8’s means an extension of U.S. surveillance….??
Anyways, I’d wager if they deem an AAR capability for the P-8 necessary they would pay for the installation of probes at some point. It’s been done with C-130s so I see no reason it wouldn’t work for the P-8. That would likely be far cheaper than installing a flying boom on the A330. Just my two cents…
FWIW, I’m glad I’ve never had to be trained to fly probe/drogue AAR. Seems way too difficult for my liking. Let the boomer do all the work. 🙂