Each 2 illuminators cooperate with 1 arm-electropult is the most suitably.

The capability of Delhi’s SA-N-7 electropult that launch the quantity of missiles at the same time has limited.Delhi has 6 illuminators is just meaningless because it only has 2 arm-electropul.The Talwar is,too.4 illuminators is too more for 1 arm-electropul.

And the arm-electropul is more trustless than the VLS.When it conk out,even you have the best radar is useless.

hmmm arent the Half Plate and Top Plate radars (Fregat) also phased array ?

eg.
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Images/MR-775.jpg

I mean they arent fixed but rotating…..rotating isnt necessarily a bad approach
as seen by horizon & type45 direction taken…though the fixed flat panels look a lot more sexy at the cost of reduced LOS horizon due to lower height.

Yes.MR-775 is PAR.But that’s not important.The worth the whistle thing is how many targets could it deal with at the same time.Unfortunately,it’s capability is more far behind the one on horizon or type45.

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=68311
Even the one on 052B which is strypped-down from the MR-776 is better than it.

Yes.Aegis also include the MK-41 VLS and the entire data management and threat analysis combat data systems.

Sugar Sugar

Please The 052 does not have Aegis it probably has a phased array located in a same position as a Aegis. Aegis is the name of the radar system. We dont know anything about this chinese system.

Of course I know that.That’s because someone call these similar systems in this wonted way.Except the export,the Chinese don’t like to publish the info about their weapons.