F-35B lift fan underside
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lockheedmartin/7117061193/in/photostream/
F-35B door mounted missile station w/ AMRAAM
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lockheedmartin/6970984144/in/photostream/
btw/
USMC AV-8 harriers operating from a austere FOB in Afgnanistan
http://youtu.be/hLUZARGNzJ4
I’ll balance the thing then. F-35B.
Actually useable off their new through-decks. Plus, as Comoford says, suddenly lots of short hard surface strips in theatre that become deployment options.
You don’t really need a carrier when you can go island hopping throughout the region.
F-35B for all those small airfields in SE Asia and SW Pacific.
Fly it out of Naval Air Station Christmas Island
As for MRTT, I can see this being a real cash cow for Cobham et al, at the taxpayers expense of course!
If it had a boom, they could’ve leased some out to, cough …. Israel.
The big question is how it is possible that NH-90 have no proper place for side gunners like on S-70/UH-60 and even on latest Super Puma/Cougar. Yes side gunners in dedicated place, no door gunners that block mounted troops to do fast disembark. This is ******* incredible!
The NH90 does have a place for the door gunners. Its just poorly designed – way to small and obstructs the cabin.
The window at the back is the door gunners station.


Compare UH-60 Black Hawk


who’s complaining about these aircraft?
After all, they are completely new aircraft, there might be teething problems…
The Tigers and NH90 were sold to Australia as being almost production ready and as close to off-the-shelf as possible.
Turns out they needed A LOT more development.
The biggest complaint about the NH90 is that the floor is too fragile and easily damaged by soldiers’ boots. I don’t quite see that as a serious problem.
Fixing that might mean adding more weight = loss of performance.
Apparently Global hawk is to be killed and U2 to be kept flying for a lot longer.
USAF are killing off the Block 30 but are still pursuing the Block 40 Global Hawk. USN still keeping Global Hawk for BAMS.
The RAAF managed to an operational F-18F sqn in wihtin 4 years. Pilots and crews were trained in the US by the USN with some pilots being carrier qualified.
Very easy way for the UK to develop CATOBAR experience. That’s the ultimate goal right?
RAAF Wants C-27J Rather Than C295
Despite being more expensive, C-27Js can accommodate the Army’s G-Wagens and LAND 121 light vehicles.
…. could use larger aircraft, such as its Lockheed Martin C-130s, to transport the G-Wagons. But Brown says “then you end up with small loads on the C-130 and this is not an efficient use” of the aircraft. He also says the air force wants to avoid a situation in which the Australian armed forces’ Boeing CH-47 Chinook helicopters are used for airlifting such cargo.
That reminds me; has Sikorsky offered the Battlehawk to any other customer or did they shelve the idea after Australia refused it in the first round?
The Battlehawk is more of an add on kit nowadays.
MH-60 Sierra – the utility version of the newer Sea Hawks on Libya ops

Black hawk

… but I haven’t read anything I believed to say the Eurofighter was definitely out of it.
The original source appears to have come from Nikkei, a Japanese financial news service (think Bloomberg or FT). Probably as close to official as a press release by a government or company.

CFT, weapons pod and internal irst
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lE3h8yImm4U
Would be great as a small order interim choice for customers who eventually want the F-35. USN (and RAF catobar), Japan, etc
Narrows the gap with the F-35 and probably puts it ahead of will-they or wont-they Eurofighter upgrade program.
Looks like a RAAF FMS purchase of 10 C-27Js is close.
Australian Gov’t requesting C-27J pricing and production availability for the RAAF