dark light

maus92

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 556 through 563 (of 563 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Reality of F-35 production cost #2411560
    maus92
    Participant

    I doubt the F-35 A/B will be cancelled, but it is almost certain that they will be procured in numbers significantly less than originally planned – for cost, not performance reasons. The airplane itself is a compromise weighted to the strike mission, which it should perform more than adequately. However, this airframe is not the answer for the Navy, hence the Charlie model is the most vulnerable to cutting – which is one way to reduce costs. The Navy has an excellent aircraft in production that is much more affordable to operate in tactically significant numbers, and still has a viable upgrade path for 10 + years – enough time to develop the right aircraft for the fleet.

    in reply to: NK torpedoes SK Vessel #2004151
    maus92
    Participant

    I’m thinking a loose / uncharted mine as probable, a casualty in a weapons locker or confined space vapor explosion as possible.

    in reply to: US Navy plan to ease "figher gap" #2420699
    maus92
    Participant

    There will be an article in Navy Times on Monday about the prospects of the F-35C and discussions about options on Capitol Hill. Expect more Supers.

    Last week the navy grounded 104 F-18A-D’s. The navy currently owns 635 F-18A-G’s. Expect more Supers.

    in reply to: US Navy plan to ease "figher gap" #2431124
    maus92
    Participant

    The Navy will be buying new Supers for several years regardless of the status of the F-35C. Expect additional Growlers as well.

    in reply to: Cancelling the F-35C ? #2010291
    maus92
    Participant

    That same convoluted logic would have had us cancelling the F-14 & F/A-18 just as they began LRIP and waiting for the F-22N & A-12…or cancelling the F-4, A-6 & A-7 just as they began LRIP and waiting for the F-14 & F/A-18…

    It’s actually rather straightforward. The F-35C is not worth the money for the capability it brings to naval aviation.

    in reply to: Cancelling the F-35C ? #2010365
    maus92
    Participant

    Any current or near-future aircraft would have problems facing a block 2 Super with AIM-120C-7’s. Even worse when the 120-D comes online.

    in reply to: Cancelling the F-35C ? #2010369
    maus92
    Participant

    To clarify my earlier post:

    I understand that the F-35C is intended to replace the F/A-18C/D’s (and the remainder of the A/B’s.) I am suggesting that the Navy procure additional E/F’s to replace the C/D’s as they end their service lives, and that F-35C development funds be redirected to a F/A-XX project. Incidentally, there is still room in the E/F for further systems development, and there is quiet chatter about developing some additional LO modifications to the Rhinos which could be incorporated into a new model, and to the external stores themselves. Perhaps Boeing will come up with some mods akin to the Silent Eagle.

    I agree that some facets of the ISR mission require persistence, but not all. I am suggesting that there be provisions in the F/A-XX (and a F/A-18 development) for some amount of ISR mission equipment.

    in reply to: Cancelling the F-35C ? #2010573
    maus92
    Participant

    Forget the Charlie model. A F/A-XX should be the path forward for the USN. The Navy needs a Naval aircraft, designed from the ground up to operate in the maritime environment. Not a rehash of a ground-based fighter like the F/A-18. Perhaps a 6G version of the F-14D….

    The F/A-XX should have: 1, range and endurance to provide for deep strike, to protect the carrier, and persistence for the ISR missions it will be invariably tasked to perform. 2, 2 engines for overwater ops – safety first. 3, 2 crew members. It is incredibly easy to get task saturated in a complex aircraft – integrated and automated systems help, but also add to workload. Let the pilot fly and fight the aircraft, and crew 2 operates the offensive/defensive/recce systems, controls the UCAV’s, and provides the incalculable value of an extra set of eyes. 4, some modicum of stealth, enough to allow for the undetected first missile shots – that’s right, shoot and scoot. Twisty dogfights are a thing of the past – BVR detection and identification will decide future air battles, performed at standoff ranges. Smackdown the enemy aircraft that threaten the mission at hand, execute, and leave.

Viewing 8 posts - 556 through 563 (of 563 total)