The knowledge and expertise is there with IWM, but I doubt those people were consulted. It’s possible the people asked to paint it were expected to know what they were doing, but clearly specs weren’t asked for or given.
If it’s one solid colour (a la Hendon) simply to show shape and size, it doesn’t matter.
If it’s privately owned, it doesn’t matter (or matters less).
If it belongs to a national *war* museum and is displayed in its name, then it does matter.
When its owned and displayed by a national museum, I would say that it is. You wouldn’t expect to see a model used in an exhibition in an inaccurate scheme, so why should this be any different?
Granted, but someone hasn’t exactly tried their hardest with this effort, have they? I understand it wasn’t done by IWM or DAS’s teams.
I believe it is an educational tool and will be taken ‘on the road’.
Brian
Not so much educational as promotional. The road part is accurate though.
Hell’s bells. That looks like a one-way ticket to next year’s “Darwin Awards”.
“I missed you more than Michael Bay missed the mark
When he made Pearl Harbor
I missed you more than that movie missed the point,
And that’s an awful lot, girl, and
Now, now you’ve gone away… and all I’m trying to say, is
Pearl Harbor sucked, and I miss you
I need you like Ben Affleck needs acting school (school school).
He was terrible in that film.
I need you like Cuba Gooding needed a bigger part (part part).
He’s way better than Ben Affleck.
And now, all I can think about is your smile, and that ****ty movie, too.
Pearl Harbor sucked, and I miss you
Pearl Harbor sucked…
Just a little bit more than I miss you…”
Apart from the fact that these ‘wartime’ roundels would have been applied in a peacetime factory :rolleyes:
And I suppose no mistakes were made in peacetime? And that these aircraft weren’t subsequently repainted once taken on charge? Perhaps even in the field (i.e. Korea)? My point was that there’s enough “reasonable doubt” to let a private owner “get away” with one slightly out-of-size roundel until the next flaming repaint at least.
Considering how wartime markings varied from the prescribed dimensions,
colours, sizings and even placement, I would think this is fine.
Smoke Brendan a kipper, he’ll be back for breakfast.
It’s the EB-52C Megafortress!
I like your definition of the South West. But, that’s up to but *excluding* Bridgwater, I presume? Or the Town of the Living Dead, as I knew it.
As said, I assumed it was being ‘Hung’ because of all the attachment points. I stand corrected then 🙂
Brian
Suspension points = suspension: a natural enough assumption! They might be handy for moving it around though.
Plastic, yes (well, GRP), hung, no. It’s a marketing tool for which DX have big plans.
I can beat this (I think). I ordered a copy of Strike Fighters, a PC flight sim/game, and what should arrive (on a disc marked Strike Fighters, in the correct DVD case)?
…”Remembering Fred Dibnah” on DVD.
Nothing against the memory of Britain’s favourite television steeplejack, but I had to admit to a certain amount of disappointment and confusion over that one.
I can beat this (I think). I ordered a copy of Strike Fighters, a PC flight sim/game, and what should arrive (on a disc marked Strike Fighters, in the correct DVD case)?
…”Remembering Fred Dibnah” on DVD.
Nothing against the memory of Britain’s favourite television steeplejack, but I had to admit to a certain amount of disappointment and confusion over that one.