dark light

Monsun

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 185 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Obituary: Terry Spencer. #1211288
    Monsun
    Participant

    Sad news indeed. Terry Spencer was featured in a two-part article in Aeroplane magazine August and September 2008.

    Peter

    in reply to: The reluctant Sea Hawks….. #1212189
    Monsun
    Participant

    A trial was conducted in 1963 by AFDS using a Lightning F.3 and a Spitfire PR.19 (PS853) to see how a Lightning would cope if it encountered an aircraft of such performance. One of the pilots involved was John Nicholls (later AVM).

    It was found that the best form of attack was for the Lightning to approach the Spitfire from underneath and behind as in any attack from above it built up speed too quickly. An attack from below also put the Lightning in the Spitfire pilot’s blind spot.

    Peter

    in reply to: The reluctant Sea Hawks….. #1212499
    Monsun
    Participant

    Great photos. You should consider sending a batch to that other monthly magazine (best not mentioned) for their Readers’ Archive feature. They pay £100 apparently!

    Peter

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1219558
    Monsun
    Participant

    With the initiatives proposed so far and in the current economic climate, the only chance of success is to guarantee Robert Pleming’s salary for another year.

    in reply to: Stand out Spitfire pilots #1221121
    Monsun
    Participant

    Don Kingaby gets my vote – known by the press as the ‘109 specialist’ and the only RAF pilot to be awarded three DFMs

    Peter

    in reply to: No.1 Squadron team members in Canada, 1934 #1221296
    Monsun
    Participant

    Ross

    Thanks for that

    Peter

    in reply to: No.1 Squadron team members in Canada, 1934 #1221308
    Monsun
    Participant

    In his book ‘Number One in War and Peace’ Norman Franks mentions that the team member in question was F/O E.M. Donaldson, i.e. ‘Teddy’ Donaldson (later Air Commodore). Can we confirm that this is not correct?

    Peter

    in reply to: Lightning High Altitude Flights #1222917
    Monsun
    Participant

    From all of the above though it seems we have three pilots who claimed to have got to around 88K (the 95K was a gross exaggeration by someone, not Mike Hale I hasten to add!)

    Brian Carroll ended up wth over 3000 hours on Lightnings and although I never met him, we corresponded on a regular basis. With all that experience I think he would have told it exactly as he saw it. Of course he fully appreciated the potential dangers and would have been monitoring the numbers closely. The rate of climb was much reduced by 85K and he would have had plenty of time to assess what his altimeter was telling him.

    On his way down ATC asked him for his altitude and he took great pleasure in saying ‘Descending through FL700’ which caused a fair amount of consternation in the Tower!

    Peter

    in reply to: Lightning High Altitude Flights #1223030
    Monsun
    Participant

    Sadly Brian Carroll is no longer around to ask and I have no idea where Dave Roome is now. The last I heard he was at Delta Jets.

    I would imagine the 87,000 ft+ that was mentioned would have been an indicated reading, does anyone have any idea of likely instrument error at that altitude?

    Peter

    in reply to: Lightning High Altitude Flights #1223053
    Monsun
    Participant

    salad fingers

    300 yards sounds a bit close. During the U-2 trials in 1962 the rules of engagement included a stipulation that the Lightning was not to approach within 5,000 feet from the rear and on no account was to pass in front of the U-2.

    The time available to effect the interception at 60K was only 80 seconds and this had reduced to 30 seconds at 65K. After that minimum control speed was reached and it was time to start heading down again.

    Peter

    in reply to: Lightning High Altitude Flights #1225415
    Monsun
    Participant

    Dave

    Thanks for that.

    I was informed of this high altitude flight some months ago and the person who related the story was adamant that he got to 95,000 ft.

    I would imagine that a bit more height is added at every telling, so if this tale is still doing the rounds he’s probably got to 100K by now!

    Peter

    in reply to: Lightning High Altitude Flights #1226082
    Monsun
    Participant

    I think I’m right in saying that the only officially sanctioned high-altitude flights in Lightnings were during the U-2 trials in 1962. Two Lightning F.1a’s from Wattisham were based at Middleton St George for the trial which was carried out by CFE.

    The maximum altitude achieved was 68,700ft and pilots wore a Taylor-Baxter pressure helmet and a partial-pressure jerkin.

    Peter

    in reply to: Lightning High Altitude Flights #1227323
    Monsun
    Participant

    Apparently Mike Hale did this high altitude flight sometime in the 1980s and XR749 was completely standard at the time, so he did it on Avon power alone.

    Peter

    in reply to: Lightning High Altitude Flights #1227933
    Monsun
    Participant

    The more I think about it, the less I’m convinced.

    Of crucial importance is the height of the tropopause. As far as I’m aware the F.3 never got any further than the Mediterranean area and even here the tropopause will be lower than in the tropics. So not only did he apparently get 7,000ft higher than in the other two cases, he would have had to do his high speed run at a lower altitude before starting his ballistic climb.

    It’s got to be a line shoot!

    Peter

    in reply to: Saudi/Kuwait Lightnings #1232679
    Monsun
    Participant

    Chox

    I’m sure you will be aware of this but there are some nice photos of Saudi and Kuwaiti Lightnings on the Lightning Pilots website.

    If you don’t have them already it might be worthwhile dropping an e-mail to Ed Durham.

    Peter

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 185 total)