dark light

fightingirish

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 1,043 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Why the Vigilante was never a resounding success? #2632051
    fightingirish
    Participant

    From the link I posted before at post #5:
    http://www.vectorsite.net/ava56.jpg

    in reply to: EU-US deal on air dispute #741536
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Talks Over Aircraft Subsidies In Jeopardy

    Next round, folks!

    Looks like a misunderstanding/misinterpretation of a phone conversation:

    Talks Over Aircraft Subsidies In Jeopardy

    By Paul Blustein
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Saturday, March 19, 2005; Page E01

    The Bush administration signaled yesterday that negotiations with the European Union over subsidies to Boeing Co. and Airbus SAS were on the verge of breaking down, raising the likelihood that the two sides will fight the matter out in a high-stakes international trade case
    ……

    Source: Washington Post -Saturday, March 19, 2005

    in reply to: EU-US deal on air dispute #756129
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Talks Over Aircraft Subsidies In Jeopardy

    Next round, folks!

    Looks like a misunderstanding/misinterpretation of a phone conversation:

    Talks Over Aircraft Subsidies In Jeopardy

    By Paul Blustein
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Saturday, March 19, 2005; Page E01

    The Bush administration signaled yesterday that negotiations with the European Union over subsidies to Boeing Co. and Airbus SAS were on the verge of breaking down, raising the likelihood that the two sides will fight the matter out in a high-stakes international trade case
    ……

    Source: Washington Post -Saturday, March 19, 2005

    in reply to: Ukraine admits selling missiles to Iran #2048885
    fightingirish
    Participant

    The SSC-4 coastal defense variant is carried in a 25.6-in (650-mm) diameter canister.

    in reply to: Do you think Brazil should have a nuclear submarine? #2057429
    fightingirish
    Participant

    In that case, the U214-class submarine would be a good option for the Brazilian Navy!

    in reply to: Why the Vigilante was never a resounding success? #2633710
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Good link here about the North American A-5/RA-5 Vigilante:
    http://www.vectorsite.net/ava5.html

    in reply to: Boeing Field – Friday March 11 #745805
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Nice pic’s!!!

    I’m afraid I can’t see any pictures at all.

    Was it foggy??? 😉

    I had to disable my pop-up filter on my internet browser to see the pictures
    Maybe you have to do the same.

    in reply to: Boeing Field – Friday March 11 #758789
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Nice pic’s!!!

    I’m afraid I can’t see any pictures at all.

    Was it foggy??? 😉

    I had to disable my pop-up filter on my internet browser to see the pictures
    Maybe you have to do the same.

    in reply to: Strongest hint from CX about a 773ER and 747ADV order #746079
    fightingirish
    Participant

    I think, you all are refering to this discussion:
    For Skycruiser or any CX afficionado – October 2004

    in reply to: Strongest hint from CX about a 773ER and 747ADV order #758997
    fightingirish
    Participant

    I think, you all are refering to this discussion:
    For Skycruiser or any CX afficionado – October 2004

    in reply to: Pics of B752 kitted out with winglets! #746235
    fightingirish
    Participant

    To Sandys post #22:

    The livery reminds of a livery I saw on a big plane nearly 2 mouths ago! 😉 :dev2: 😀

    in reply to: Pics of B752 kitted out with winglets! #759109
    fightingirish
    Participant

    To Sandys post #22:

    The livery reminds of a livery I saw on a big plane nearly 2 mouths ago! 😉 :dev2: 😀

    in reply to: RAFALE Questions #2635306
    fightingirish
    Participant

    2. I read, that the rafale only flew low over or maybe did also touch and go-landings on a USN carrier (CVN-74 ?).
    The French Navy has the same CATABAR system like the USN, but maintance tools, equiment etc. are different.

    in reply to: IAC PC-9M and it's hardware ! #2635327
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Go raibgh mile maith agat!!!:)

    The pic is so good, I took it as my new avatar! 😀

    So now soon the St. Patricks-Day celebrations can begin!!!

    in reply to: What the? New US stealth plane? #2635537
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Tanker Airship

    I presume, such a tanker airship would be stationed over the oceans serving aircrafts flying between the continents. I can’t see in the trailer,if this airships stands still and the aircraft are flying VTOL or airship and aircraft flying both at low steady speed. They could be flying on circle route as you see in the ring explosion.
    The next step would to serve the aircraft not only with fuell but also with ammo, burgers and freedom fries:

    McFly, just follow the big yellow “M” on your display!!!

    😀 😀 😀

    The USN have their carriers, they USAF have their oversees AFB’s (e.g Guam, Diego Garcia, the Azores etc.),so AA-refueling(AAF) is nearly all over the oceans for US aircraft possible. As we all know, the US have small tankers like the F/A-18 (buddy-buddy) and big tankers like the KC-10 (both AAF-systems).

    To defend such a thing in the sky would be very nonsensical.
    Just remind yourself of WW1, seeing the german zeppelins bursting into flames.
    OK, with helium, AWACS, bullet-proof skin,electro-magnetic-shields against AAM’s, the airship could survive! But that’s all SF! 😉

    The USAF will be getting new KC-767’s or KC-330, the RAF and RAAF also the A-330 MRTT, the germans and canadians A-310 MRTT and the Italian AF also the KC-767.

    To sum it all up:
    So such a tanker airship is not necessary.

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 1,043 total)