dark light

fightingirish

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 1,043 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2492562
    fightingirish
    Participant

    looking wayyy forward, in the long term i hope (and am optimistic of) seeing Boeing sell lots of KC-BWB (you get what i mean) to USAF. for KC(Z) perhaps, ~2020.

    all is not lost – while EADS busy themselves building KC-45As Boeing should sit down and come up with something revolutionary from a clean sheet of paper. i would really love to see an operational BWB design. it’s got lots of potential, if not for the airlines then at least as a tanker/transport.

    Yeah, I would love also seeing a different sized “(K)C-BWB” replacing the C-5 and KC-10 from 2020 on.

    …tactical tanker…

    The KC-45 will might have chaffs, flares and an anti-missile defence system.
    So it will fly nearer to theatre ops.

    Ready for future growth
    β–  LAIRCM, RF threat warning and data link provides
    state-of-the art defensive suite
    β–  Net-ready to expand for next-generation requirements…
    ISR, Command and Control, Cyberwarfare and other
    modules as needed

    Source: Official KC-30 brochure (PDF)

    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2493260
    fightingirish
    Participant

    This may also increase the chance that European nations order more US stuff. The F-35 for Germany and France is thinkable, as is the Chinook for Germany. In conclusion, we might see the day where there is a real trans-atlantic open market for military equipment …
    yeah, I know, a bit optimistic

    Very optimistic or ironic there, Schorsch! πŸ˜‰
    I doubt, that Germany would get the F-35.
    The €F and later UCAV’s will replace the F-4F,Mig-29’s and then the Tornado IDS.
    But I can see Germany and maybe France might support a European version of the CH-53K.
    But now back to topic!

    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2493343
    fightingirish
    Participant

    I wonder, what this decision will mean to other decision like CSAR-X?
    Maybe Boeing will get the HH-47 order as a ‘Trostpflaster” (eng.: consolation).

    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2493735
    fightingirish
    Participant

    πŸ™‚ for EADS/Airbus, πŸ™ for Boeing!

    Still I have a feeling the decision is not finally. The US Election might play still a role here.

    in reply to: Another new Iranian F-5 variant. #2495629
    fightingirish
    Participant

    I am still wondering where the main gear is located on the F-5 with a mid mounted wing? :confused:
    I presume just like as on the YF-17 & F/A-18A.

    in reply to: B-2 Crashes in Guam #2496155
    fightingirish
    Participant

    According to AviationWeek.com, the B-2, s/n 89-0127, AV-12, Block 10, named “Spirit of Kansas”, crashed onto the runway shortly after takeoff from Andersen Air Force Base in Guam.
    The B-2 was not loaded with weapons at the time because it and three other B-2’s were going to fly back to Whiteman Air Force Base. A B-2 already in the air was called back to land following the crash. The planes to replace them are 6 B-52s from the 2nd Bomb Wing at Barksdale Air Force Base.
    Source: AviationWeek.com – B-2 Crashes on Takeoff From Guam

    in reply to: B-2 Crashes in Guam #2496419
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Maybe the pilots forgot to switch on the anti-grav during take off! πŸ˜‰ :diablo:

    in reply to: C-17s 7 and 8 for UK? another mystery buyer? #2496512
    fightingirish
    Participant

    (…)My instant reaction to people on this forum saying it might be Sweden was a firm no. But the more I think about it, it does seem more of a possibility largely because SAC seems to be going nowhere at the moment. At first glance, it just seemed odd given that the Swedish MoD is looking to make savings from the defence budget and have already cancelled the SEP armoured vehicle project partly as a result, and several other projects are at risk. Perhaps the money is being reallocated to the C-17 purchases. Be interesting to see future developments.

    In addition to the large number of local residents, up to 9,000 foreign tourists (mostly Europeans) enjoying the peak holiday travel season were among the dead or missing, especially people from the Nordic countries. The European nation hardest hit may have been Sweden, whose death toll was 543.[44]

    After the Tsunami 2004 even peace groups in Sweden wanted to buy the C-17 to be used for many peacetime & peaceful purposes like disaster relief, emergency evacuation, transport of scientific personnel & equipment, etc.

    in reply to: B-2 Crashes in Guam #2496515
    fightingirish
    Participant

    it’s not the first B-2 that has been lost. In the Broken Arrow movie the B-1 as they call it in the movie was actualy a b-2 πŸ˜€

    Wrong, it was a “B-3”, to be more “sleek and mean” as the B-2.
    Info: ‘B-3’ bomber from ‘Broken Arrow’ movie – Scott Lowther’s model

    Video:
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8056690944027586573&hl=en

    It’s raining RAM!!! πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: Su-35 first flight #2497276
    fightingirish
    Participant

    As the spinal/Su-27 airbrake has been discarded to accomodate fuel (now 11,500kg, an increase of some 20%), the airbrake function is delegated to differentially deflected rudders, slightly visible on the pre-take off pic.

    Oh, just like as with the Raptor and the Superhornet. LM and MDD (now Boeing) scrapped also the air brake during development.

    “…what do you mean the PAK-FA’s been delayed again?”

    “First flight of the PAK-FA will happen when you return on your third term as President in 2012, dear comrade Putin!” :dev2:

    in reply to: An interesting report on where SM-3 is going. #1788425
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Did the missile use explosive warhead or only hit to kill inert warhead?

    No explosive warhead, just kinetic force!
    Press conference at the Pentagon:
    http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=vvrP1ZQrk10

    in reply to: Need Hrlp -Two-seat Northrop A-9B(?) #2509915
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Most of the pics & drawings (all of those hot-linked) are gone… only the ones with separately shown links still work.

    Bager1968, you have to become a member of Secret Projects Forum to see the pictures! πŸ˜‰ πŸ™‚

    in reply to: BA 777 Emergency Landing Short of Runway at LHR #560272
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Good video there, but difficult to ascertain exactly how it was being moved. Is it supported on a couple of tugs? Looking at the way the light changed from day to night, looks as though they had a problem taking the right hand turn!

    The aeroplane was jacked up so it’s on big stands. Then airbags had been put underneath it and a whole series of railway sleepers.

    Thanks for the link, Sandy! πŸ™‚

    in reply to: BA 777 Emergency Landing Short of Runway at LHR #560298
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Any pictures out yet of the plane being moved away to the hanger?

    in reply to: Tornado, after market for them? #2514817
    fightingirish
    Participant

    ….,museums and gateguards!

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 1,043 total)