dark light

Tigerotor77W

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 81 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Skybus Airlines – America's answer to Ryanair #587581
    Tigerotor77W
    Participant

    That is a crazy livery…

    and no orders yet is indeed odd. Maybe they’ll pick up the Primaris 787 orders. ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Qantas orders 115 787's #586293
    Tigerotor77W
    Participant

    http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=conewsstory&refer=conews&tkr=BA:US&sid=ayF38xwOHb3g

    The 50 options, filled, maybe?

    With 787-10s?

    Interesting possibilities if nothing else…

    And then this, first posted on A.net:

    Requires subscription

    By Adam Tanner

    SAN FRANCISCO, March 29 (Reuters) – Qantas Airways AX> is very likely to exercise its option to buy another 50 Boeing Co. 787 Dreamliner jets on top of an existing order of 65 planes, the company’s chief financial officer said on Wednesday.

    The airline, the world’s eighth-biggest passenger airline by market value, also hopes to decide in the coming months on new ultra long-range jets, Qantas Chief Financial Officer Peter Gregg told Reuters in an interview.

    In December, the Australian carrier announced it would buy 65 Boeing 787s for more than $10 billion, with the option to purchase another 50, also worth more than $10 billion. Officials met in San Francisco to sign the deal on Wednesday.

    “Effectively, there are 65 orders out there in the books straight away and you get the ability to buy another 50 at the prices we have negotiated,” Gregg said. “We will want those 50, I am pretty sure of that.”

    He said Qantas had negotiated a discount from Boeing’s list price, but declined to give specific numbers.

    Qantas decided on the Boeing jets after also considering the A350 made by Airbus, which is 80 percent owned by European Aerospace Defence & Space Co. and 20 percent by Britain’s BAE Systems Plc .

    in reply to: Undercarriage drawing #586295
    Tigerotor77W
    Participant

    Stunning! Very nicely done.

    in reply to: Happy Birthday, Steph #597136
    Tigerotor77W
    Participant

    Naturellement, je suis un peu en retard… mais joyeux anniversaire! Merci beaucoup pour ce que tu as fait pour ce forum!

    in reply to: Name the airline & aircraft #601633
    Tigerotor77W
    Participant

    Is it possible to tell the difference between a 757 and a 737 from inside the cabin, given that they both have the same cross-section?

    in reply to: Insight into BA's longhaul fleet renewal? #605546
    Tigerotor77W
    Participant

    Is it possible to take options without placing a firm order? (Is there a deposit involved still?)

    Or what would prevent me from taking options on a few 772LRs… I’m a college student with far, far less than the $150 million sticker on the 77C. ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Virgin A350 #605551
    Tigerotor77W
    Participant

    Out of curiosity, will the proposed 748 be more expensive to maintain and operate then the 773ER? I’m confused as to why the 748 isn’t the best replacement for the 744s.

    in reply to: Virgin A350 #607329
    Tigerotor77W
    Participant

    Well this is the belief from the interior. We reckon the A346 will continue to arrive in large numbers, the A380’s will arrive shortly before departure of the B744’s to be replaced with a large order for B773-ER. Don’t think Virgin will be interested in the A350.

    Interesting opinion. I would have thought (yes, I know, just thought) that Virgin would replace the 744s with 748Is but leave 773ERs out of the equation entirely.

    I guess my question, then, is what does this say about the potential of seeing the 748 and 787-sized planes in Virgin’s fleet?

    in reply to: airline announcements #614629
    Tigerotor77W
    Participant

    Haha, all very nice! I was on a UA flight from ORD to DEN and the pursor made similar remarks… shame I didn’t write any of them down. The only one I specifically remember (now) is when the plane was still taxiing but nearing the gate, passengers started to unbuckle… a soft “Nuh-uh-uh” came over the loudspeakers.

    Personally, though, I’m thrilled that there are still flight attendants who love their jobs.

    in reply to: Boeing 767 Production #527526
    Tigerotor77W
    Participant

    Could be… guess we’ll see.

    But that would be a sweet deal — 777Fs for the USAF… mmm… (not that I’m biased toward the 777 at all :dev2: )

    in reply to: Boeing 767 Production #534630
    Tigerotor77W
    Participant

    Yeah, I saw that yesterday as well. I’m guessing Boeing lost the bid to Airbus A332 tankers?

    in reply to: 777-200LR @MAN #536470
    Tigerotor77W
    Participant

    Grey Area — interestingly enough, Boeing uses the same name (Unk-unks) for the same situation Rumsfeld described, though surely years earlier.

    (According to “The 21st Century Jet: The Building of the Boeing 777”)

    in reply to: Toulouse Diary #504558
    Tigerotor77W
    Participant

    Trรจs, trรจs bien, comme d’hab. ๐Ÿ˜Ž

    Tigerotor77W
    Participant

    I must agree… I dunno if it’s the livery or the clouds, but the A346 just looks like business.

    And I’m of the T7 camp!

    in reply to: Boeing Crosswind Video #566278
    Tigerotor77W
    Participant

    Anyone have the language skills necessary to translate the text? I haven’t gotten around to translating frame by frame…

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 81 total)