dark light

farnboroughrob

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 592 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 'After The Battle' RAF site plans #802229
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Thanks TonyT, had no luck with ‘after the battle’ maps have been discontinued. RAFM prices look too cheap to me, will find out?

    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    After all there is only one replacement for a dak…..another dak, even after 80 years. I wonder how many remain in commercial service?

    in reply to: Even minor issues take time and effort #807431
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Thanks for sharing, amazing how much effort it takes to care for a wooden airframe.

    in reply to: Lancaster PA474 At Duxford For Major Work #808871
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    I can say 100% that the lanc will not be flying in public at the weekend, which is a shame as we were expecting her at the Blackbushe 75th. This week rubbish weather probably didn’t help with the possibility of test flights either.

    in reply to: Investigating a dump – questions #809027
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Hi in the next week I am going to go and take photos of everything on the surface, then I am going to contact the land owner. This is just in case I get a big no and they fence it all in!

    in reply to: Lancaster PA474 At Duxford For Major Work #809348
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Would appreciate any info on the Lanc’s return to flight, expecting it at an event this weekend!

    in reply to: Investigating a dump – questions #809382
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Hi guys thanks for all the info. As I said we are just some local enthusiasts who have been pointed at the dump by a ex employee. We have recovered a couple of items from the surface but have gone no further. I will be contacted the suspected land owner today and see what happens.
    Rob

    in reply to: WWII Flights To Lisbon #809613
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    From research I have done on one on the 110 wing squadrons in 1945-6 is very murky. 110 wing had operated scheduled flights from 1945 to Naples, Paris, Brussels, Warsaw, Athens, Berlin, and the Channel islands, among others. From January 1st 1946 these were operated on behalf of the European Division of BOAC , which of course became BEA. The reason was the delay in acquiring enough Dakotas. The RAF lend-lease daks could not be used by BOAC as part of the agreement, so there was a delay in purchasing the aircraft. Getting back on track they are some very interesting photos at Lisbon. CS-TDA was delivered from USAAF stocks the former 42-100930, clearly it retained us US camo for a while.

    in reply to: Investigating a dump – questions #809620
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    That is probably true. However I can easily get permission from the CEO of the company who were last users of the dump, for about 8 years actually.

    in reply to: Airshow-related Accidents #810601
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    In deed, although I think that anybody who ever went to Mildenhall can forgive me for queuing for ,probably, my third burger! We don’t get catering like that any more, sadly.

    in reply to: Airshow-related Accidents #810820
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    It is quite bizarre that I have been at several airshows with accidents but have never actually seen it happen. The Cranfield barnstormers event mentioned previously I was walking to the toilet, or similar. Mildenhall Vintage pair accident I was in the burger queue. Fairford Mi-29’s I was walking back to the car. A couple of years ago I was close to the Brimpton fly-in Tiger Moth crash, but I was walking out of the gate 100 yards away back to the car. I have witnessed several minors at fly-ins but none that resulted in more than bruises to body, and pride.
    Living in Farnborough I have seen many of the pre show practices and have been fearful. Remember a Mig 29 getting it wrong with a tail slide over the town center at about 500ft, or so it seemed. However airshow are much safer today because the pilots are more professional, more prepared, and there are stricter rules (even if some are total over kill). I think that no matter how we try and mitigate them accidents will always happen where ever there are humans. A scan of the AAIB website will tell you there are probably 500+ accidents during normal flying for every one at a airshow.

    in reply to: WWII Flights To Lisbon #811737
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    That DH-80 is interesting. Looking at Air Britain’s DH-80 file there are not many candidates even of Portuguese registration
    cN 2040 ex G-ABCX Regd in Portuguese Angola as CR-HAA .38 to Dr AntonioVideira; named “Talvez”. [Also reported as owned .38 by Adelino Amaral]. Regd CR-LAH. Crashed.
    2235 To Club Aereo de Quelimane, Mozambique with CofA 3483 issued 2.6.32 (but no such aero club at time – probably to local resident). Regd CR-MAE .32.

    Of course these lists could include Portuguese overseas colonies? There were several DH80’s involved in the Spanish Civil war but look to be out of use by 1940. Of course it could also be a wrong id?

    in reply to: WWII Flights To Lisbon #812084
    farnboroughrob
    Participant
    in reply to: what type of A/C were they flying ? #812164
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    I would also say a non flying accident as have not heard of LAC1 ranks etc on air crew duties, unless they were part of a working party flying somewhere?

    in reply to: WWII Flights To Lisbon #813034
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Longshot that is a very interesting photo of Lisbon. The foreground dakota looks like D-ARPF, ex PH-ALV, the BOAC dakota is G-AGJ? (GJV-Z were Daks). The other camo dakota doesn’t have any obvious marking, next Iberia Dakota and a TAP Lockheed 18 CS-ADS? Then what appear to be Lockheed Hudsons of the Portuguese Air Force, plus a possible BOAC example? Then two of the six captured B-24’s. Fascinating photo.

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 592 total)