dark light

farnboroughrob

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 592 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Shaibah Iraq Fury and Chipmunks #787634
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    I think I heard that it was captured by UK forces, photos about of UK troops stodd in front of it. The plan was to export it but I think it was not cleared by higher authourity and was left in Iraq. Apparently looting of war prizes was frowned upon by higher eschilons.

    in reply to: Westonzoyland Update,(Middlezoy Aerodrome) #787739
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Thanks WW453 sounds much more interesting, I might drop by in the summer.

    in reply to: Westonzoyland Update,(Middlezoy Aerodrome) #787784
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Looking great, congratulations. Is this the same place as the long standing microlight strip? Went there a few years ago and it was not enthuiast friendley. Or it it on a nother part of the original field?

    in reply to: Nord 1002 on Stuttgard airport viewing terrace. #787902
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Oh and yes it is supposed to be still there…

    in reply to: Nord 1002 on Stuttgard airport viewing terrace. #787903
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    http://axis.classicwings.com/ gives it as Nord 1002 c/n 163 ‘D-EFAG’ and previously HB-OAR, D-EHUX, D-EAOR,D-EACS formerly at Frankfurt (where I saw it) and Berlin.

    Rob

    in reply to: Aircrew Pubs – WW2 #788531
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    A couple you can add for RAF Hartford Bridge/Blackbushe. The Cricketers on Cricket Hill Yateley. The Cricket pitch and other open land  in front of the pub became a domestic site in 1942. It was very popular as the pub remained open. I don’t think cricket has been played there since?  Other one was The Anchor, Vigo Lane Yateley. This was on the way between the base and many of the billets in the village. It did have lots of photos from the airport the 40’s and 50’s but these dissapeared in the early 2000’s during a refurb.

     

    Rob

    in reply to: Aviation Databases #789124
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    I have had Aerodata for 10+ years and just use it for logging. It is very up to date and comprehensive. Only drawback is that it has not be developed for years so doesn’t have anything more than basic search routines. It is very much construction number driven, for instance you can not produce a historic register, or historic airline fleet list from it.  I would be tempted to switch to something that was more searchable but as up to date. 

    in reply to: Long Marston Trio ..Meteor Shack and Prince on the move #789322
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Well thats some news, but what sort of state are they in? I last visited 10 years ago and they looked ready for the scrap man then. Terrible shame as it all started off so well.

    in reply to: LGW movements record #790731
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Yes they were recorded, however they wern’t always kept. Back in the 40’s-60’s airports nationally were mostly run by the Ministry of Civil Avation, MCA. They did record movements but mostly only kept them only for 5 years. When I was reasearching Blackbushe (MCA airport 1947-60) I found nothing. However some of LGW , and LHR movements books from around 1960 onwards can be found in the Surrey History center in Woking, or could 10 years ago. The Gatwick Aviation Society has a very complete record from 1958 I believe available fi you are a member?

    in reply to: New UK MIles Magister #791248
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Sadly going to be based in the Czech Republic. I see the Hawk  G-ADWT has departed to Germany. Luckerly got to see it in the hangar at White Waltham but never any where else.

    in reply to: Spotters, who are they? #792112
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Yes spotting, as in number collecting, is a dying hobby. There are young people taking photos, but not numbers. I find many of those do not have anywhere the depth of knowledge of the number takes as its more about getting a good photo, that what the subject of the photo actually is. 

    Yes note taking of military aircraft was very much frowned upon in the 50’s/60’s. Of course cameras were banned at RAF displays until the late 50’s(but not at USAF and FAA ones!). I have a friend who was in the RAF in the 50’s and he had to to to great lengths to disguise serial taking on duty. Particually when faced with training at St Athan and being faced with trying to record dozens of rotting Mosquitos, Spitfires and the like!

    in reply to: Spotters, who are they? #792235
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Yes some of us spotters did do things with all that info, but most didn’t.  Having written two books about my local airport, pretty much all the photos came from spotters, as well as using their notes on what was there when.  They recorded history that was genrally not kept by the official channels. Pretty much all the official information on movements at UK airports pre 1960 was destroyed without thought. 

    in reply to: Spotters, who are they? #792259
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Yes defo the Queens building at LHR. Too early to be me. Nowadays us spotters are more likely to on a phone seeing what is on its way.

    in reply to: De Havilland Meteor Crash in Pakistan 1949 #797058
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    Pakistan didn’t start jet operations until 1953. It is likely the gentleman was flying a Hawker Tempest , or Fury as these were the mainstay of the RPAF in the early days. It could of course have been a harvard because of his instructor duties?

    in reply to: DC3 down near coast in the Bahamas #799448
    farnboroughrob
    Participant

    There were N437GB, N138FS, N15MA, N705GB DC-3’s plus a Canadian Basler conversion, and  Convairs N345GS,N145GT, N343GS. These were the old pistons but there was also a pair of YS-11’s and a pair on An-12’s. I first went in 1990 and is is unrecoginisable today. 

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 592 total)