dark light

APRichelieu

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 145 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: SAAB Viggen land and take off video #2084692
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    The Norwegians use a pod with a parachute to allow their F-35s toland on shorter runways, andit is not working as intended.

    https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a29463777/norway-f35-parachute-problem/

    Other F-35s still require long runways.

     

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2086237
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    Saab Presents First Gripen E to Brazil

    https://www.defense-aerospace.com/article-view/release/205769/saab-hands-over-first-production-gripen-e-fighter-to-brazil.html

    I wonder how it will get to Brazil. Sweden is a long way from Brazil.

    The distance from the Kap Verde Islands to Brazil is 2700 km.

    [ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”full”,”data-attachmentid”:3874359}[/ATTACH]

    APRichelieu
    Participant

    Draken had a datalink, which was quite unique at the time.

    in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2095304
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    And SAAB is out!

    Well, this is unexpected. And me thinking that the chaps were the frontrunner.

    https://saabgroup.com/media/news-pre…-flight-tests/
    https://www.vtg.admin.ch/content/vtg…tml/75184.html

    I suspect that this has just become something between Dassault and the Americans

    They are not out.
    The offer stands.
    They will not do the flight test right now.
    The big question is whether they do the flight test later or not.
    If not, then they probably going to face a degrading of all scores.

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2096446
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    The contract between Sweden and Hungary expires in 2026. It was extended in 2017, and includes an upgrade to the MS20 standard.
    What happens after 2026 is of course totally open.

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2106554
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    Is there anyone who knows the planned production schedule of Gripen E in Sweden for their air force (+ initial frames for Brazil)? Additionally, is there a maximum number per year the current Swedish FAL can handle? I am curious partly because I am aware that Rafale export contracts have resulted in deferred deliveries to French forces and wonder if the same fate might befall the SwAF if, for example, Switzerland were to order 30-40 Gripen E.

    SAAB claimed in their annual seminar last week that they can produce 24 aircrafts per year.
    Not sure if this includes the Brazilian Factory.
    The Swedish and Brazil orders can be completed in 4 years.

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2115982
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    Gripen E has gone into serial production and is expected to enter SwAF service in 2021 rather than in 2023, as previously expected

    https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar…ets-sa-455831/

    SAAB seem to have a habit of doing what they said they were going to do or better, don’t they? Congratulations (in advance) to them.

    I wonder when Brazil will order more. Talking to a SAAB representative at Farnborough last year, he was saying that SAAB was hopeful Sweden would be increasing the size of its order, too. They also have a good chance of picking up an order for 30 or more from Switzerland and the recent cancellation of second hand F-16’s from Israel makes a Croatian order a possibility. I assume that pursuing selection in Canada is a waste of time but that selection by Finland remains a possibility.

    Order book might double in size in the next 2/3 years?

    According to some article I read last week, there are early negotiations going on with Brazil for another 72 Gripen E/F fighters.

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2125014
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    SAAB announced that their part of the T-X contract is 25 B SEK ($2,74B), if all options are exercised.

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2129281
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    The pilot hit several large birds, and tried to return to base, but the plane became increasingly hard to handle,
    so the pilot ejected about 5km from the base. The aircraft crashed in difficult terrain

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2135150
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    Can’t give a link but I recall SAAB saying some years ago that Gripen E was expected to cost less than Gripen C to produce. I presume that this was linked at least in part to the use of an off-the-shelf engine produced in much higher numbers than the indigenous Volvo incarnation of the F404 used in the ‘C’. Of course the final cost will depend on how much radar, EWS, MAWS etc cost compared with projected costs.

    The 204 Gripen A-D had a total cost of 100 B SEK, or an average cost of about $55M. That number needs to be updated for inflation, when compared to the $72M for Gripen E. For Gripen E, the R&D cost has to be split up on about half the planes compared to Gripen A-D.

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2135277
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    Budget fighter? Really? Whose budget are you referring to, since most countries that may look for a budget fighter will find the Gripen E to be a damn expensive jet.

    Answer this question- will it be a sub $80 million fighter, flyaway price?

    The Swedish Air Force is buying for $72M average cost. Unlike the flyaway price this includes R&D.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyaway_cost
    With the ~100 orders, each aircraft is burdened with $2B/100 = $20M, so a guess of flyaway price is ~$52M.
    Currency Exchange variations may change this up and down. The original order was 35,6 B SEK which translated to $72M per aircraft, but the dollar vs SEK rate has increased so the price in SEK has increased for US sourced parts, but Swedish and U.K. parts should decrease in dollars.

    The $80M price for F-35 does not include upgrade to Block 4 which is expected to be $16B by some
    https://www.defensenews.com/air/2018/03/08/new-f-35-modernization-plan-could-come-with-hefty-16b-price-tag/
    Divided over 4,000 aircrafts, this is an additional $4M.

    A budget conscious country would be looking at CPFH which would be more important than the cost of the aircraft. At 8,000 hours, this adds $80M if CPFH is $10,000.

    in reply to: How good was the JA-37 Viggen? #2144621
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]260587[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: How good was the JA-37 Viggen? #2145995
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    Mentioning that the MiG-31 had a datalink before the JA-37 Viggen is useless information.
    That is just trolling, and got the deserved answer.
    Saying the the MiG-31 had a datalink, and then comparing the features is useful information.

    in reply to: How good was the JA-37 Viggen? #2146119
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    Congratulation to the Russians for introducing a digital datalink,
    20 years after it appeared in J-35A Draken!
    Impressive.

    in reply to: How good was the JA-37 Viggen? #2146495
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    I have wondered for some time how the Automatic Gun Aiming works on Viggen and Gripen.
    It would make sense to me, if the aircraft could detect the distance, position and speed vector of a designated enemy, and once the pilot has achieved an approximate firing position, the aircraft would enter an auto pilot mode, where it would create a perfect deflection shot, firing the cannon at the right time. Then it would return controls to the pilot.

    Is there any aircraft with such functionality?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 145 total)