strange fight to pick considering the Danes are saying its cheaper and better. But Ok!! you guys may need to grow up and realise that the opinion of people in the know outweighs your own.
so here is an honest question, again we see the F-35 picked. Denmark releasing their report and their findings, that directly contradict what many here have been claiming, and rather than reexamine their position, these people would rather persist and (with no evidence of their own to back their claims with) won’t even bother to read the report, and yet will blithely call others trolls when they ask for proof that contradicts the official report.
So the question is, is there at any point any amount of evidence that will ever change certain peoples minds? or is this like the “faked” moon landings and other conspiracies contradicted by evidence at this point?
I wil break it down barney style. The Danes put out a report. An official report. There could well be errors, and miscalculations maybe outright myths (even typos!) but the burden of proof is on the accuser. please find and present your counter argument (preferably with links, evidence etc) rather than posting about the USMC IOC from 9 months ago.
The Norwegian calculation of cost showed that the F-35 lifetime cost would be cheaper than Gripen E
even if SAAB had given them all aircrafts for free.
When You want to make a choice for reasons that are politically incorrect,
then You have to invent reasons, and if all parties agree on a lie, then that is what will be
published, and outside sources will be ignored.
SAAB expected such political meddling and dropped out without a bid.
Sign In
