That is just bravado, until there is an agreement with India.
Anyone remember MMRCA?
Rafale was selected, and not a single plane was built in India as a result.
It was Croatia which decided to buy near end of life F-16s from Israel.
And no, there are no plans to produce Rafales in India.
There are preparations for production, in case the Rafale win a significant order ๐
Sweden ordered NH-90s which were delayed and delayed and delayed.
So some Blackhawks were acquired as well, when the waiting time became intolerable.
It was revealed the other week that the NH-90s CPFH is 5 times higher than that of the Blackhawks.
The spares are extremely expensive.
One thing about the oft-told tales of the SR-71 being a “victim”. In those cases, the SRs were flying at the same known altitude at the same known speed, on the same known route with no deviations to either side at all, at a known time (determined by the Blackbirds known launch time when they flew that repeated mission) no maneuvering or attempt to avoid, no countermeasures, etc. With a scenario like that, it’s not surprising that they were “intercepted”.
Not quite, they were on a passing south of Sweden on their way to Russia, turned North, and when they were
getting close to Finland, made a high speed left 180′ turn.
At that speed, the turn radius was immense, so they had to enter Swedish Air Space briefly.
After leaving the Swedish Air Space, they flew south between the islands of รland and Gotland.
There is a real narrow gap of international waters, and they cannot deviate much without again
violating Swedish Air Space.
The time from passing South of Sweden, to entering the gap between the islands was known, so it was
easy to send a JA-37 Viggen to intercept.
Thus the SR-71 had really no choice.
After showing the USAF that interception was possible, the SR-71s started to slow down to MACH 2,5
in the turn, which allowed them to make the turn without violating Swedish Air Space.
You probably think SAAB has no involvement in the training part of TX, because You have no clue about SAABs capability here.
SAAB training systems has some pretty advanced technology.
Lots of it is also available in the Gripen S/W suite, so I would be surprised if that is not a significant portion
of what SAAB is delivering to Boeing.
It has been proposed for the F-35, but refactoring 20 Million+ lines of code is not an easy task.
It would be good if there was established a standard API within the Western world,
so that an App would run on several aircrafts.
I would be surprised if the SAAB/Boeing T-X is not using the SAAB App based S/W architecture used in Gripen.
This allows new functionality to be added by the user, by developing an App, which can be downloaded to the T-X
without involvement by SAAB and/or Boeing. Not much unlike the iPhone.
What if Russia disarms, and no longer develops any fighters.
Then we could save a lot of money, since we do not have to protect ourselves
against a country making unveiled threats on a regular basis.
Maybe if You had an ounce of sense, you would be aware how popular (not) Russia is in the rest of Europe.
People do not seek alliances with other people that does not share the same values.
SAAB has proposed Gripen C/D, not Gripen E/F to Austria.
In 2020, the Swedish Air Force has started to see deliveries of Gripen E,
and this may free up SwAF Gripen Cs for Austria.
Maverick flies an F-14 in Top Gun. I am sure that Austria won’t be getting F-14s.
The US has the resource to make the promise. Unlikely Airbus or Dassault can make it.
So far only two options has been discussed in Sweden.
Cannibalizing Gripen C/D to use some parts for new Gripen E aircraft.
Keeping Gripen C/D in service and build all new Gripen E aircraft.
If Sweden can sell or lease the existing Gripen C/D instead of cannibalizing them for Gripen E,
and get more than what is saved by the cannibalization, then that new option should be discussed.
With Gripen E coming aboard in 2019, the Austrian timing is good.
The Swedish Government has, according to Svenska Dagbladet, decided not to goahead with a Gripen bid to Belgium.
The reason is that Belgium requires support from the vendor in the form of air refuelling and reconnaissance,
which would require Sweden to support some NATO actions where Sweden otherwise would not get involved
https://www.svd.se/forsvarsministern-sager-nej-till-export-av-gripen
Is there anyone that has reliable data on how many aircrafts you need to maintain a certain
sortie rate per day for the F-35.
I have seen old claims of 4-6 sorties per day, and newer claims that the F-35 can only
fly every second day.
If that latter is true, then you probably need many more F-35s to fulfill the job of a Gripen.
Did the development of Typhoon AND Rafale mean that NATO is crumbling?