dark light

APRichelieu

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 145 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2147332
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    That is just bravado, until there is an agreement with India.
    Anyone remember MMRCA?
    Rafale was selected, and not a single plane was built in India as a result.

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2147455
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    It was Croatia which decided to buy near end of life F-16s from Israel.

    And no, there are no plans to produce Rafales in India.
    There are preparations for production, in case the Rafale win a significant order ๐Ÿ˜‰

    in reply to: NH90, yay or nay? #2170724
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    Sweden ordered NH-90s which were delayed and delayed and delayed.
    So some Blackhawks were acquired as well, when the waiting time became intolerable.
    It was revealed the other week that the NH-90s CPFH is 5 times higher than that of the Blackhawks.
    The spares are extremely expensive.

    in reply to: Ja 37 viggen ( interceptor version) vs Mig-23MLA #2136593
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    One thing about the oft-told tales of the SR-71 being a “victim”. In those cases, the SRs were flying at the same known altitude at the same known speed, on the same known route with no deviations to either side at all, at a known time (determined by the Blackbirds known launch time when they flew that repeated mission) no maneuvering or attempt to avoid, no countermeasures, etc. With a scenario like that, it’s not surprising that they were “intercepted”.

    Not quite, they were on a passing south of Sweden on their way to Russia, turned North, and when they were
    getting close to Finland, made a high speed left 180′ turn.
    At that speed, the turn radius was immense, so they had to enter Swedish Air Space briefly.
    After leaving the Swedish Air Space, they flew south between the islands of ร–land and Gotland.
    There is a real narrow gap of international waters, and they cannot deviate much without again
    violating Swedish Air Space.
    The time from passing South of Sweden, to entering the gap between the islands was known, so it was
    easy to send a JA-37 Viggen to intercept.
    Thus the SR-71 had really no choice.
    After showing the USAF that interception was possible, the SR-71s started to slow down to MACH 2,5
    in the turn, which allowed them to make the turn without violating Swedish Air Space.

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2142429
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    You probably think SAAB has no involvement in the training part of TX, because You have no clue about SAABs capability here.
    SAAB training systems has some pretty advanced technology.
    Lots of it is also available in the Gripen S/W suite, so I would be surprised if that is not a significant portion
    of what SAAB is delivering to Boeing.

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2143119
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    It has been proposed for the F-35, but refactoring 20 Million+ lines of code is not an easy task.
    It would be good if there was established a standard API within the Western world,
    so that an App would run on several aircrafts.

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2143449
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    I would be surprised if the SAAB/Boeing T-X is not using the SAAB App based S/W architecture used in Gripen.
    This allows new functionality to be added by the user, by developing an App, which can be downloaded to the T-X
    without involvement by SAAB and/or Boeing. Not much unlike the iPhone.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2155073
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    What if Russia disarms, and no longer develops any fighters.
    Then we could save a lot of money, since we do not have to protect ourselves
    against a country making unveiled threats on a regular basis.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2155242
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    Maybe if You had an ounce of sense, you would be aware how popular (not) Russia is in the rest of Europe.
    People do not seek alliances with other people that does not share the same values.

    in reply to: The future of Austrian fighter fleet #2161936
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    SAAB has proposed Gripen C/D, not Gripen E/F to Austria.
    In 2020, the Swedish Air Force has started to see deliveries of Gripen E,
    and this may free up SwAF Gripen Cs for Austria.

    Maverick flies an F-14 in Top Gun. I am sure that Austria won’t be getting F-14s.

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2163737
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    The US has the resource to make the promise. Unlikely Airbus or Dassault can make it.

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2163781
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    So far only two options has been discussed in Sweden.
    Cannibalizing Gripen C/D to use some parts for new Gripen E aircraft.
    Keeping Gripen C/D in service and build all new Gripen E aircraft.

    If Sweden can sell or lease the existing Gripen C/D instead of cannibalizing them for Gripen E,
    and get more than what is saved by the cannibalization, then that new option should be discussed.
    With Gripen E coming aboard in 2019, the Austrian timing is good.

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2164579
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    The Swedish Government has, according to Svenska Dagbladet, decided not to goahead with a Gripen bid to Belgium.
    The reason is that Belgium requires support from the vendor in the form of air refuelling and reconnaissance,
    which would require Sweden to support some NATO actions where Sweden otherwise would not get involved

    https://www.svd.se/forsvarsministern-sager-nej-till-export-av-gripen

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2181791
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    Is there anyone that has reliable data on how many aircrafts you need to maintain a certain
    sortie rate per day for the F-35.
    I have seen old claims of 4-6 sorties per day, and newer claims that the F-35 can only
    fly every second day.
    If that latter is true, then you probably need many more F-35s to fulfill the job of a Gripen.

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2186335
    APRichelieu
    Participant

    Did the development of Typhoon AND Rafale mean that NATO is crumbling?

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 145 total)