dark light

Nicolas10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 4,147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2173263
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    nm

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2173354
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Indeed there is no reason why you couldn’t bleed energy without a full fuel load.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale 2017-2 #2173356
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    My bad I forgot the teens.

    edit: BTW the post was aimed at the guys who always try to discredit Rafale. As evidenced in this very page, when someone mentioned directional LPI datalinks, some US guy was quick to point out that on that slide there was no mention of directional. Always talking the Rafale down, which means we always have to come up with debunking or proofs of whatever the Rafale can do, whereas naysayers can always spout their drivel without any supporting information.

    Thank God this time there was the AFM article that confirmed the directionability of the datalink.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2173372
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Europe is not a country & as such a European force is a ridiculous idea, I would never die to defend Europe vs anyone. I would defending France vs the UK or Germany, like so many people from my family did. The day Europe falls it will be because of its own doing, it’s not worth defending. The only people who would die for Europe are mere mercenaries.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2173441
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    If only France would do the same.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2173772
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    How does building a turbojet mean that you have turbofan technology?

    in reply to: Rafale 2017-2 #2174226
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    “The” IFDL in the F-22 is classified so no, it’s not the same.

    Also, the above pic says LPI but not “directional”.

    AFM also confirms it will be directional, which is pretty obvious because I don’t see how it could be otherwise if it claims to be LPI, but I digress.

    Loved the AFM story of the meteor which was re-targetted in flight & destroyed the target even with its warhead removed (direct hit).

    Edit: Also from AFM: “The capabilities of a single Rafale to locate and track a threat without resorting to traditional, but time-consuming methods of triangulation or of bearing measurements along the aircraft’s flight path will be significantly improved”.

    You can’t improve on something that doesn’t already exist right? Secondly there are other traditional ways. And third of a single Rafale. But they fly in pairs at the very least… Food for thought for those who claim geolocalization of threats is impossible except for F22 & F35.

    Nic

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2174228
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Looks like a shortened Il2; them merrickans are copying the russkies.

    Nic

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2174338
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    High AoA nose pointing, specifically the pedal turn…

    Ah yeah I forgot the pedal turn, but wasn’t this useless when only russkie planes could do it?

    Nic

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2174807
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    So what move did it do that a delta-duck couldn’t? I’m not asking for a friend since I saw the Paris demo in person.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2174811
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Your own link mentions that they “assemble” the F100, as well as manufacturing “some engine parts”. I doubt that those engine parts are the most sensitive or hard to develop/build.

    Good luck sourcing all the other parts without US support, especially in a short timeframe.

    Nic

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2175548
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Like Bud says.

    For example: an American company makes a product with 3 components. I’ll call them A, B and C. They need to be assembled to make the product. Let’s say each component costs $30 and assembly to make the product costs $10. Cost to manufacture the product is $100. Let’s say the manufacturer sells the product for $150. Profit = $50.

    So in the case components are sourced overseas, it’s not a big deal to Boeing shareholders indeed, but going with your example: US workers get 10$ worth of manufacturing. Shareholders (Carlyle?) get 50$ for sitting on their a$$e$, while China/Japan/Taiwan or whomever will get 90% worth of work. Commercial balance for the US : $-90. What’s not to like for the US taxpayer/Citizen/patriot/regular person that hasn’t been brainwashed by the media/school-system yet?

    Not to mention the day your supplier decides he won’t sell you your stuff because he finally realized the treasure bonds he owns from you are worthless, you will be unable to replace the parts he made for you easily.

    If you can buy A for $20 delivered to your US assembly plant from a different supplier (inside or outside the US), cost to manufacture the product drops from $100 to 90$. Let’s say the manufacturer sells the product for $150. Profit = $60.

    Thanks for the lesson in economics.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2175561
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Only three countries have jet engine tech. to build top level engines U.S., Russia and France.
    Now none of those are stupid so how will Turkey build fighter not hampered by engines like China is with without engine none of those three will give it.

    I didn’t expect this kind of engine inquisition. Only three countries can build top level engines. France, Russia, the US and the UK.

    Nic

    edit: beaten to it by QuantumFX

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2176589
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    USA good Russia & Syria bad.

    So you can be sure the US did everything they could to stop that evil Syrian pilot to get shot down.

    But the guy really wanted to bomb jihad joes so…

    in reply to: UCAV/UAV/UAS News and discussion 2015 #2179131
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Stealth de-icing?

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 4,147 total)