dark light

Nicolas10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 4,147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2182545
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Chemical weapons against your civilians is also illegal by international law.

    So this is why the CIA tested LSD on the french town of Pont St Esprit instead of trying it on a US village. Makes sense.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2182548
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    That’s true for all pilots who get shot down over enemy territory in the Middle East, regardless of which country they come from.

    You mean the A10 pilots who bombed Syrian troops for 1h right before a beartie attack would get the same treatment? Or the F18 pilot who shot down a syrian jet because he was bombing beardies too close to a beardie training/rest area?

    Maybe. Then again I seriously doubt it.

    The goal of the US is to dispose of Syria. Wesley Clark said so years ago and now it’s easy to verify he was right.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2183212
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Kudos to the Russian troops to go fight in places where they pretty much know what will happen if they get captured. It takes many times the balls than the US show when (for instance) they shoot down a syrian plane that’s only armed for air to ground & then brag about it at some conference or something.

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    What’s the only fighter plane that bagged a couple F14s?

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Easy:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]258619[/ATTACH]

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I’d pick the Mig 19. Wiki says first flight in 1953 & service entry in 1955.

    Nic

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Thanks to the F5D nomination I went to read about it on wiki & found the best nickname for a US project : the X20 Dyna-soar.

    Nic

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2193074
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Here I thought it was to meet the needs of the partner nations that shared the development costs and are currently sharing competitive bidding on contracts to the benefit of their own aerospace industries while getting a modern and capable asset.

    lol

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2193154
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    “The F-35 is a killing bot that will terminate the EU Industry”: Dassault CEO – Mr Trappier

    If you weren’t always sucking on the american tit you would realize that it’s precisely the goal of the F35 project, and why the program was defined as it was, to suck up R&D budget and fixate customers to wait for it instead of running real competitions or going on gvt to gvt deals.

    Foot in the door 101.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2193164
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Let me put it this way. The fact that the US like so much to bomb the crap out of many a country means that through sheer economies of scale they can get guided bombs for cheap.

    So what next, you guys are going to advise Russia to bomb dozens of countries with guided munitions to lower unit cost? That sure would be more humane than dropping bombs that fall 50 meters off ISIS.

    Nic

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Not Mirage III per se, but Mirage V & derivatives (Kfir, Cheetah).

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2207596
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Fact is noone knows what special forces do. Same for “intelligence” services. Fact is they have been doing the worst kind of stuff for decades.

    Saying that US intelligence or specops don’t help ISIS is just delusional. If you knew as much you wouldn’t be able to tell without facing life in isolation.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2207606
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Sorry mate I got mistaken because someone replied to a post of yours quoting the $150 mark. It was indeed ooshiney’s post. My bad.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2207614
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    As for that P8, it is obviously a coincidence, just like the A10s bombing syrian government positions for an hour just before an ISIS attack on exactly the same position. Nothing to see here.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2207615
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    The usual ignorant supidity from you. I never said exactly 1,200, and they aren’t buying the drones, they are making them, captain obvious.

    Actually, you said $150. But hey go back & edit it.

    Nic

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 4,147 total)