J-11D makes a lot of sense for Pakistan to pursue.
will be cheaper than the SU35
if Russia has no objection over the sale of RD93, precedence has been established to sell the AL31F direct or via China.
no Indian hue and cry.
geo-political changes, SCO, resumption of military sales by Russia to Pakistan etc. etc.
China could allow TOT to assemble the J-11D in Pakistan.
The Chinese refused to sell even the J10A to Pakistan. iirc there were quite a few statements by highers up in PAf about 36 J10, then it was the B version and eventually it fizzled.
What makes you think China will offer J-11D !? Also TOT ?! 😀
No data links between any assets I believe
IAF has Operational Data Lin k- ODL, under varied stages of implementation and AFNET which went live back in 2010.
Your beliefs are dated.
50 years of 1965 … lots of stories … some more unreal than others …
This is on the myth of MM Alam … but wait, it was written by an Indian journalist – it must be wrong, right ?:highly_amused:
http://iadnews.in/2015/09/breaking-the-myth-of-mm-alam/#.VecN8IG3TqB
Grand slam was slammed shut. Yet its a win for teh delusional. Weird are the ways and the math.
These types are still too distant.. To boost up numbers, PLAAF needs J-10Bs and J-11B/Ds. If these can be produced in meaningful numbers, then the Su-35S doesn’t make sense (apart from engine technology). But we’re not that far, yet. :sleeping:
seems the odds are in favour of PLAAF placing a order of 24-36 Su-35s compared to even acknowledging that the JF-17 even exists … forget ordering even a token amount ..
When did the JF-17 achieve IOC and FOC ?
do they even know to test. T-90 is well tested tank in deserts around the world and getting continous upgrades.
It has same credibility as urgent buy of C-17 after Nepal earth quake or early retirement of IL-76.
Brilliant ! 😀
The army which operates around 1000 T-90s and will eventually operate 1657 T-90s doesnt know how to test those tanks. :applause:
Weekend comedy :stupid:
He is obsessed with posting articles non stop to try to make the IAF look bad.
It is pretty comical and everyone sees it for what it is.
You can tell he gets particularly giddy whenever anything Indian crashes.
yeah, but in his mind he is pursuing an “agenda” .. :rolleyes:
My friend, everyone in life has an agenda. You do. Other posters do and I do. What exactly is the point you are making. I don’t even think you know. If I post something not to your liking but is not offensive and is relevant to the thread, then with all do respect, I really could not care less what you think….
You do realize this is a message board to discuss Modern military aviation. Whats with the “agenda” non sense ?
This post of yours only adds credence to my previous post. You do need to get out and have a life.
Its okay to have fun .. 😉 :very_drunk:
@Mountain, you seem to be obsessed with the IAF !
You’ve posted this same piece of news twice in two different threads 5 hours apart ..
Id say, step out some time, get a drink, get laid maybe … Such deep obsession is not good. 😀
That is a captive training missile! Powder blue color! Fighters usually only carry a single missile of this type. Facepalm!
This is interesting. Just the 1 jet of 4 which were inducted @ CCS had the single captive training missile – powder blue colour.
Im a little intrigued though. For an induction ceremony, PAF kits out just 1 jet with 1 wing tip training round, whereas during an display like the one below, they kit out actual missiles ?

Also, since you so authoritatively state that “Fighters usually only carry a single missile of this type” , would you be kind enough to post more pictures of JF-17 with such a similar arrangement ? i.e. single powder blue colour captive round pictures ?
Thanks.
Hmm, cant make a simple observation without getting it reported and deleted !
All the aircraft which were pictured while landing for their induction ceremony @ CCS didnt have wing tip missiles, except the one id mentioned .. so its fair to assume that either one fell off or the one thats remaining on station failed to fire and got stuck.
@ Y – 20 bacon : The PAF does practice anti terror drills and had a whole exercise named “saffron bandit” in 2013 .. they could provide valuable “input” against the ISIS …

They seem pretty confident with jettisoning Drop tanks against ground targets accurately.
Right now no developing country can make a fighter as good as the JF-17. And it may be the first jet fighter to achieve export success without it’s country of origin operating it. For China to pass on it means China is now a lot wealthier than they thought they would be 10-15 years ago.
But Pakistan makes it and they claim credit for almost the whole program. JF-17 is unimaginable without Pakistani input. Not sure if the Chinese would have succeeded in their low cost export fighter project without PAFs input.
Getting T-50 is not detrimental to the JF-17 project in my opinion. I am sure software would allow the T-50 to replicate much of the JF-17/F-16 (and in the future) J-10 fleets. A double seater JF-17 may not do this, and as someone pointed out, China may not show interest in developing one.
Why would PAF stretch their already thin resources by going in for the T-50 when the ‘Multi role’ JF -17 is already available ?
Also, the JF – 17 is primarily based on Pakistani input.
Dont you think with some added input and pressure/request, a 2 seater JF -17 can be obtained from the Chinese ?
What about PAC ? Cant they design a 2 seater all by themselves ?
I don’t care about this LCA versus JF-17, but I believe your statement here is not correct because I have an old GE poster showing all the military aircraft (drawings) using their engines (late 1980-ish, I would date it around 1989) and in it was the LCA. In fact, that’s the first time I’ve learned about the existence of the LCA and the drawing in the poster looks very very close to what the LCA looks like today….really not much changed, thus the development have already went through some phases.
Hi, here is the official time line of the LCA …
http://www.tejas.gov.in/history/timeline.html
The first Technology Demonstrator Aircraft was rolled out on 17th Nov 1995.
LCAs design itself was finalised in 1990. Wonder how it managed to reach GEs poster in the late eighties !
Could have been a concept drawing..
As I told you earlier, our crispy miscreant started this ridiculous thread for only one purpose, to smear China’s image and stir up hatred. Most of Bacon’s threads are similar. Therefore it is a public service to steer the conversation away from the original topic.
Now let’s get back to India. You claimed that it is in India’s long term interest to “play by the rules” which also includes pretending to be a democracy. Yet time and again, India have been sold substandard weapons at high cost which no other country would take. After you’ve been screwed so many time, is it not time to ask who made these “rules” and for what reason? Ask yourself, what would Gandhi do? play by the rules? What would Jesus do? play by the rules?
Protect China’s image by bashing India. :eagerness:
Gandhi/Jesus !! Were you high when you posted it ? :rolleyes:
lol, oh wait, so someone’s badmouthed the Limited Capability Aircraft Tejas, that means he’s got to be one of your arch foes from Pakistan?! So anyone who mentions the JF-17 and Tejas in the same sentence must be one of those ISI bogey men?! According to your logic, that must make Alan Warnes a Pakistani too!!!
Anyway, carry on with the racial slander, when you can’t argue on facts and figures, turn to racial insults instead, just goes to show you way of thinking, similar to your compatriot “BlackArcher”.
If a reference to Abbottabad is a “racial insult/slander”, then I apologize.
I seriously fail to get it though, how it might have offended you.
Anyway, could you please list them “defense aerospace circles” which refer to the Tejas as a Limited Capability Aircraft ?
I genuinely want to know …
Thanks.