dark light

Lightndattic

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 349 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dutch airshow 2006 picutres #2581222
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    I was very surprised that during the Blue Angels display a lot of passes where done over the public. Is this not banned in Europe? In fact, earlier that day a Spanish F18 had been given the red card, and according to the announcer would be punished by having to eat at the mess.

    You’re talking about the sneak pass where right after the diamond does it’s elegant sweeping pass, number 5 blasts over from behind at high speed, right? I’ve always wondered that myself. The Thunderbirds basically do a side to side show (other than 360 turns and the crossover break), but they are still flying TOWARD the audience, whereas the Blues come from every direction. I thought flying toward and over audiences were banned after Ramstein ’88.

    in reply to: Lockheed may offer India Israeli version of F-16. #2584455
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    Well, certainly the Singapore F-16s have Israeli ‘spines’

    How is the enlarged spine Iraeli when it was first seen on the VISTA F-16 in the late 80’s?

    And correct me if I’m wrong, but weren’t the F-16I’s delivered to Israel without the indigenous systems installed since Israel didn’t want us to install them? If that’s the case, How can LM offer those systems they aren’t allowed to touch to a third country?

    in reply to: Lockheed Next Generation Long Range Strike #2586452
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    Unmanned?

    in reply to: Movie "TRANSFORMERS" – supported by USAF #2588493
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    MiG-25!

    And T-72!

    He was one of the original triplechangers. I had him and Astrotrain (the train/space shuttle one) too.

    in reply to: B-1 accident yesterday #2592295
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    Thanks for all the information, Daemon. How about a little opsec for once? Guess who can see everything you write . . . on every forum. . . from every country.

    That info has been said many times in public before. I’ve seen a Wings episode and read several books where they discussed it’s low level capabilities. This is nothing new or secret.See Page 19

    Lightndattic
    Participant

    Why the heck is the US being so idiotic?

    The problem is the US Congress full of old men and women raised in a culture or paranoia about technology sharing, all fighting to get the most for their constituents and by doing so keeping themselves in their positions of power. The fact that a foreign nation being an equal partner in something originating here is an anethema to them. They are the ones who add delays, cost, and make the procurement process so painful.

    Do you know why the majority of the Lockheed Skunkworks projects (U-2, SR-71, F-117) were able to be made so advanced and so quickly? Because they were outside of the goverment’s review and 435 House Representatives and 100 Senators didn’t have their fat fingers in the projects trying to take as much as they could for themselves. Do you know why the F-22’s procurement and now the F-35’s development is so screwed up? Because they want hearings about the alternative engine, they want the procurement numbers reduced, they take away funding already granted, then re-instate it 3 months later (just so they could look good to some of their voters who think the project is a waste), they want to cancel projects on the verge of production when the development costs have already been spent, they want a delay so the “technology can mature” (not caring that those delays end up costing more than upgrading early examples later), they want the supplier base spread out as much as humanly possible (and as much in their districts as they can get) so long as it’s all here in the US.

    If they would let LM and it’s foreign partners run the project like a business transaction, you wouldn’t have all these problems. They should have done a fixed cost project so the incentive to make it work as inexpensively as possible is LM and it’s partners motivation for design, development, testing and production efficiency. They better they do that, the more profit they receive in the end.

    Sorry… I just had to rant.

    in reply to: Why don't Chinese or Russians copy YF-23? #2564575
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    I wondered the same thing after the ATF competition. When they announced the winner as the F-22, I was thinking- Wow, Northrop just did 75% of the development for a 5th generation fighter for someone. Granted it pretty hard to reverse engineer something as complex as a F-23 without the real design documents or a prototype to tear down.

    I guess the only reason not to would be if a nation had already invested time and research into a design they are more comfortable with. With regards to the PAK-FA, they are drawing upon their considerable experience with the Flanker and it’s dirivatives.

    Lightndattic
    Participant

    Very impressive, but I’d like to see the video of these launches:

    http://www.users.qwest.net/~jhove1/rockets/TridentSpiral.jpg

    and

    http://www.smdc.army.mil/SMDCPhoto_Gallery/Missiles/THAAD_FT09.jpg

    in reply to: RIAT RAF Fairford Vid. #2565389
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    Color me interested.

    in reply to: Little Bird for small AF? #2576327
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    Well, i love the A-4SU from Singapur. Has any other Air Force sent their A-4 for this modification/upgrade or was it only available for their contry? I bet some small-budget AF (like the CentralAmericans) could buy a dozen of A-4s and send them over to Singapur, so they can extend life and be sure that they will have an aircraft for 10 or 15 years more.

    I started this thread because of the Salvadoran, Guatemalan and Nicaraguan Air Force. As for the Salvadoran the only jet available its the A-37B, these were donated 24 years ago and never saw any upgrade. So, its been a while since El Salvador hasnt seen a fighter…the Kfir, F-5 and A-4 have been evaluated but never got to something. So i believe that AFs like the Salvadoran, will have to stick with turbo-prop attack aircraft like the Super Tucano (if they want to buy new aircraft) because of their tight budget. With this in mind, theres a small market available for a low-cost fighters in the small budget air forces.

    Saludos.

    I’d love to get my hands on some of the A-4’s that New Zealand recently let go. IIRC, They were some of the newest Scooter modifications and quite capable.

    in reply to: Classic F-105 shot. #2582912
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    Weasels. Nice.

    in reply to: Future BVR fights in practice #2585125
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    That’s why the worst situation for a missle is a tail chase. The target typically is bending the throttles forward over the stops trying to get every single bit of thrust and accellerate while most missles will be rapidly exhausting their fuel. The practical range in a tail chase is MUCH less.

    Another thing to take into account is the flight profile of the missle. Some missles are “direct fly” meaning the fly stright at the target- typically WVR missles. Others are “loft” missles in that they use their rocket’s burn to climb to very high altitudes (~100K ft for the Poenix, IIRC), then coast before starting their terminal dive. Some missles can do both depending on the range of the target.

    in reply to: Is there a clean Nuclear attack?? #1815001
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    What about an enhaced radiation device of ~5kt detonated at ~ 10,000ft. The fireball is very small, but the radiation would kill most anything in it’s effective radius while producing very little fallout or damage to structures.

    I read about them in a couple of fiction books (Chains of Command) and looked into them on FAS.org.

    in reply to: loud or what… #2587677
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    I was at Dyess AFB in Texas during an ORI which included an alert takeoff. Imagine 12 Bones taking off fully loaded within ~4 minutes.

    in reply to: Drop Tanks #2590387
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    Yep, 600. They’re actually pretty big.

    IIRC, the A-10 uses old F-111 tanks.

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=122116

    vs.

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=117567

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 349 total)