Well, 18 years on, and STILL going!!
They added a few more aircraft, the major ones are the tank buster Hurricane with Vickers 40mm and Ju 87D
Any ideas?
Luftwaffe WW2 JU-87 jumo me109 bf109 Fi156 fw190 bf110 ju88 LW
FAR more likely to be a Soviet aircraft part.
Or an American muscle car air scoop. 😀
Seen aircraft in better shape at a scrapheap.
..after it was shredded. :p
I do prefer bringing rare examples to great static examples (Hampden, Whirlwind, Sterling, Ju188, of course Do 17, among many others) than a type with many airworthy examples.
Short finals, being described as such, yes I can see how it is a mountain feature. One of those coincidental images.
While the engine core looks in reasonable condition, the airframe look in very poor condition.
Maybe the spar and leading edge are serviceable, but everything else needs to be replaced.
Corrosion will eat all parts and cause microscopic voids in the material, so the metal will never be as strong as one kept on land (even if sometimes rained on).
Instruments will be useless.
Stick and quadrant maybe fully salvageable, maybe.
DaveM2,
My sources was a native Norwegian who works at a museum, has decades of work with vintage aircraft.
He says (I think he said based on German wartime documents), they list is some 2000 aircraft in all the lakes and fjords in Norway.
Look at how many have been fished out of Norway so far, so I would be inclined to be believe a substantial number does indeed exist.
Post above ^^^^^^^
Of COURSE a 2 engine ‘Fax would fly!
Devoid of crew (save pilot and engineer) turrets, bombs, extra fuel, and pounds of equipment, 2 engine would be enough! (provided all worked correctly)
Especially if more powerful engines installed.
Then again, what would be the point for such an aircraft if it could not carry anything more than the bare minimums??
While being aft of CG is possible, I find it highly suspect the crew would allow such a mistake to happen.
And what about that smoke trail behind the Ju in the picture?
Any updates on the investigation or theories? (I know, takes a long time).
PS, tragic year for vintage passenger aircraft flights:
Convair 220 crash in S.Africa, 2 dead
C-47 Bluebonnet Bell crash on takeoff in Texas, 2 severely burned.
Dragon Rapid crash in Canada
Sooooo,
Prop mounted on some wall somewhere now?
(would have it on mine 🙂 )
It is a long article, but worth to read.
Anyone have a read at least part way?
Navions where used by USAF as the L-17
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Navion
Our CAF club is working to rebuild one.
http://houstonwing.org
Awesome! I wonder if they deliver to USA?
After buying that Astute Class Nuclear Sub, need to save every pound I can on manuals!
It is silly to even think a twin engined, 2 person “heavy” fighter could match the maneuverability of a single engine fighter (consider a 110 mass and equipment is almost exactly same as 2x 109’s).
Yes, the P-38 was quite maneuverable rivaling some single engines, but is a rare exception. In the end, a 110 is at a maneuver disadvantage to singles.
However, the 110 did enjoy a sound speed advantage over the Hurricane (and most French fighters) and as long as they did not engage in maneuver “dog fight” combat would be competitive. Naturally, against the Spitfire and other faster fighters, the 110 was in a very bad position, largely depended on others to help.
Bottom line: Tactics, fly to strengths.
In short, speed and/or alt advantage, attack, extended and attack again. Never go below a certain speed and alt, maximize team mates.
Most sim games model the 110, and those to fly the sim 110 to strengths often do very well, even excellently.
The faster level speed over Hurricane allows escaping and re-engage when conditions favorable.
The one major issue with using sims to judge the real aircraft and crew is the learning curve. Players have luxury (and safety) of learning and practicing best tactics to win with many failures in process. Not so such option during the war.
Reveals very little, and nothing on what caused it.
Broken Arrow.
(sorry)
Great job Norway!
Good grief! It makes you wonder what else is out there in this sort of condition. This is readily identifiable as a Spitfire, even to these untrained eyes.
Norwegian friend told me official records list some 2,000 aircraft wrecks in all the lakes, many of them landed when frozen then sank when ice melted.
True number is debatable, but in short, there are a LOT of them!
Norway is reluctant to recover these aircraft, however the aircraft are a pollution source and the government may now be more inclined to remove them to reduce water contamination.