dark light

Flying_Pencil

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 698 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: One-Of-A-Kind Wright Aircraft Collection Offered For Sale #864791
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Cant get recreations of aircraft older then this!

    in reply to: Sad RAF Museum #865857
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    That be Duxford then !!

    Dux will explode! (and RAFM management heads will explode)
    place looks pretty packed.

    Biggin Hill is good location, close to London and could attract a lot of up and coming aviators; although the council does not look keen.

    North Weald is possible contender too, with Tube access, and on same motorway (M11) as Dux.

    BTW, Dux and IWM have a model of a top notch air museum.

    in reply to: Mark Hanna #865874
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    IF someone posts info about Mark, with bio, sources (news links), etc, I can make wiki page for him.
    Especially the organizations and groups he worked with.

    Otherwise I have too little to make a useable page.

    in reply to: Buffalo C-46 hard landing #865877
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    I am.

    One-time inernal IT Consultant for a large airline. Last time they bought new scales (the old ones were very old and they wanted something that would talk to a computer so there was no data input task) it was my project. From memory – it was more than 10 years ago, so don’t quote me – we bought three. One for Heathrow, one for somewhere else and a spare. But mostly, as I said, they’d spend their time in a cupboard.

    Clearly I can’t comment on how other airlines do this, but the scales we bought were one of the industry standard items for the task. I can’t remember how many options we had, but there was definitely more than one potential supplier. One would expect that an operator with smaller aircraft would use the scales more frequently, and one whose fleet was 100% longhaul widebodies much less frequently. But they all still do it sometimes.

    Thing is, most US airports do not have a scale for even small aircraft uses.

    One would think FAA require all airports have a scale handy.

    in reply to: Sad RAF Museum #865881
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    My OP comments only apply to Hendon. I have not been to Cosford for 12 years.
    I think that Hendon could look a lot better by just tidying up and proper lighting.
    Also clear up to date information boards, if they want to know how it should be done
    look at Newark Air Museum!
    mmitch.

    That is my point, mmitch.

    Cosford is a far better display of artifacts in a more period grouping.

    Hendon is a place that far out grew its facility and is struggling to fit is first class collection in some semblance of story telling.

    Recall Hendon was mainly a collection of WW2 fighters, bombers, and a (crude) collection of BoB. 35 years on it is bursting.
    Remember why they scrapped the Berverly? (stupid decision).

    Here is a radical idea
    Move everything to more space, like Biggin Hill. At least that is still an active airport.

    in reply to: British win at Reno #865998
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    …really cool
    https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5665/21533930410_87795d7c2b_c.jpg

    R2D2 did not help the L-39 (or L-29??) win this race!

    in reply to: B25 v B17 bomb doors. #866517
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Thanks for the replies, very interesting. Often wondered why the doors on the B25 at Dunsfold open instantly.

    To expand the discussion to other aircraft. Does the He111 and Blenheim have bungy sprung bomb doors?
    The film BoB shows bombs pushing open the doors as they fall past and I’m sure I’ve seen a film of a Blenheim crewman pulling open the doors of a Blenheim?

    He 111 used coil springs so the bomb could push them open.

    HOWEVER there was also a method to crank open the doors as well.

    in reply to: British win at Reno #866523
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Is the aircraft modified at all or is it stock?

    Some info here
    http://racingjets.com/content/jets
    section IV of rules
    http://racingjets.com/sites/all/docs/2014_RJI_Rules.pdf

    Seems mostly stock.

    and details here
    http://reports.airrace.org/2015/2015.Jet.Race.24.Report.html

    in reply to: Mark Hanna #866525
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Tragic loss, like Paul Mantz.

    (Someone should make a Wiki page, as there is none!)

    in reply to: P47 ducting #866527
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Seen diagrams, but seeing it exposed is quite different experiance.
    Thanks for posting!

    in reply to: Last Flight of ETPS Beagle Basset #866529
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    I believe this one starred in one of the ‘Test Pilot’ programmes on BBC. Its unique ‘Flight control simulator’ would be
    the reason it has remained in service so long. Will it be replaced? or will future students have make do with a
    ground sim? The series is on Utube.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9knSaT_4Tw&list=PLN0hIJIziY4_YIxdzCZWDHnjqklbl0K50
    mmitch.

    Fascinating! With that ability must be reason to keep it around that long.

    Needs a good home.
    Thanks.

    in reply to: Searching for name and unit of Luftwaffe nightfighter #866531
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Try Theo Boiten Luftwaffe War Diaries Vol 1 page 203. This book is indispensible for all Nachtjagd claims. I cannot praise it highly enough.

    Pilot Hptm Gunther Friedrich, 4th kill, Stab NJG1 2km E. Zutphen at 5700metres 0140hrs.

    Have to try that out, thanks.

    in reply to: Thai scrapyard update. #866534
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Not an early 172.

    The first omni-vision 172’s were introduced in 1964 (172E), but the earlier models (from the 172C onwards IIRC) had a swept tail. That is not a Bird Dog tail (they had a rounded fin), nor is it from a U-17 (Cessna 185).

    Looks like a backyard creation to me.

    Also the Lycoming engines are not ex-Bird dogs, as the Bird dog was fitted with a Continental O-470 engine. The engines look (at a brief glance) like VO-435’s, so are probably out of a helicopter.

    That’s exactly what I mean!
    Anything before 1970 is early for me.

    The leaf spring main gear and shape of door is clue.
    Could be 175 too.

    Curiously the mount for wing strut is covered up, as is step and hand hold.
    Guess it was damaged fuselage stripped and made into display.

    in reply to: Tonka Tails take to the Skies #866537
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    How much for a complete tail? 😉

    in reply to: Buffalo C-46 hard landing #866540
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Look where it landed.

    It will be challenge just to fix it enough to ferry to repair station.

    And they will likely have to drag it off the strip to clear runway for other aircraft.
    (Unless can lift and drop gear)

    Are they still filming that show??

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 698 total)