dark light

Flying_Pencil

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 698 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2018: Dutch Catalina PH-PBY to be sold abroad… #794774
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Most unfortunate.
    No other Euro organization willing to take it on, like Red Bull?

    What about the political realm, perhaps creating a set of rules for operating vintage aircraft?
    Not first time these living museums were hurt by rules meant for for-profit airlines.

    in reply to: The 'new' RAFM Hendon , where have the aircraft gone #771712
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    https://assets.londonist.com/uploads/2018/06/i730/177a9777.jpg

    So that is what the former BOB museum looks like now?
    Completely different, isn’t it.

    I read elsewhere the suggestion of closing the location, and looking at the current location there is much against its location.
    Recalling my last visit, it no longer felt like an air museum being under siege by the city around.
    It had changed from my 1984 visit in intangible ways too (first time in 1978 or 79).

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]261342[/ATTACH]

    IMHO a new site is needed, something more like Duxford.

    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Very nice suggestion, Stephen.
    Given its small size, you crammed a nice selection in.
    Just a correction: #24 image is an F-22, not F-35.

    Consider also: Hanging some aircraft
    And
    Where put viewing platforms?

    Still, the idea of moving out of Hendon may be a sad reality.
    RAFM did not seem to consider what the future be like. Duxford (finally saw in 2014) is vastly superior in just about every conceivable way.
    Cosford is OK, but I felt not as welcoming (shrugs)

    …. Actually, seeing the models idea.
    Hendon could be a great research site and miniature world.
    Design it for children education, adult research (massive library), and a smattering of aircraft for up close viewing and some hands on.
    For example a Cessna 172 that people can sit in and touch.
    With children in mind, it would be far easier for schools to have tours in with less worry about damage to historic artifacts.

    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Great topic!

    Skimming over it, it looks like airports/museums need to have clearly posted signage on when and where photos can be taken.

    Need to bring it up with our museum.

    in reply to: TFC Fiat CR.42 Updates #771793
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Not so much stumbling blocks, just normal difficulties. Some of the larger companies who have facilities we require see the jobs we want done as not worth getting out of bed for. The other problem as soon as you mention “aircraft” their legal beagles tell them to leave it alone. We recently had a flexible fuel pump drive manufactured, beautiful job put together by three guys who came to the project. “Sorry you can’t have it, its being fitted to an a/c!”

    UGH!!
    Pretty soon lawyers will sue God for the weather and other natural disasters!

    Looking FAN-TASTIC!

    Maybe someone can provide layout, or even make, skins for this game?
    https://live.warthunder.com/feed/camouflages/?q=#CR42

    in reply to: Westland Whirlwind Mk1 fighter revisited. #771797
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    As an FYI, WarThunder has the Whirlwind, and a “Builders Program” for people to create models for players to use.

    At the very least you can create new skins for players to use.

    http://wiki.warthunder.com/index.php?title=Whirlwind_Mk_I
    http://wiki.warthunder.com/index.php?title=Whirlwind_P.9

    in reply to: What's this air driven generator off of? Vimy? #771803
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Its not just a generator, but also a transformer!

    Thomson Houston Co Ltd label states:
    Generator (usually DC, but maybe was AC?)
    1000V 100mA (100 Watt)

    Transformer (Rotary)
    Input: 11~12V 12A (132~144 Watt)
    Output: 1000V 30mA (30 Watt)

    AM label only says (and does not match)
    1200V 120 Watt (100mA)

    I assume the Transformer for was ship power to convert to V the W/T could use. Simple transformers use the AC wave as the working component, so I am guessing here it is using the rotating armature as the working component.
    During war mechanical inverter was used, a regular DC motor driving an Alternator to create the desired AC power (usually 400Hz). Not sure if this was DC or AC.

    in reply to: Dornier G-BMFG #775381
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Thanks for more pics!!!

    in reply to: Zerstorer! #776799
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Excellent thread! Lots of great books on an under estimated aircraft.

    The Bf 162, is it basically a 110 with new nose and different engines (well, it would be equivalent to an early 110, A version?)

    BTW, “Jaguar”. I wonder if that was twist to the “Jäger” (hunter) word? Much like Panzer morphed into Panther?

    in reply to: Vampire with Spitfire #776986
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Lovely!! [ATTACH=CONFIG]261208[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: WWII ALUMINIUM COMPOSITION #777147
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    This thread is a gold…, I mean Bauxite, mine!

    (bauxite is ore for aluminum )

    aircraftclocks, have a Japanese friend who would do very Japanese things to see copies of that document.

    in reply to: Brigand TF1 #777151
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Very nice display model!
    No expert, but looks like a simple desktop model, like those wooden ones you can get today.

    Good to see the oft’ forgotten Bristol Brigand getting some attention.

    Rob

    Oh, certainly not forgotten.
    in game WarThunder
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]261200[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Cool warbird paint job… #777673
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    NoICE!

    in reply to: Projects Wants And Trades 2015 #787005
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    baz62, that “entire connection from the gauge to the engine” could be a simple copper tube with common fittings. If so, easy to fabricate new piece.

    As for me:
    Anything Dornier.
    17, 215, 217, 24, 18.

    Open to RAF/FAA items too, if I have some change for. 🙂

    in reply to: Piece of Cake – 30 years ago…. #787011
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    I think that some of the criticism of the series was down to the audience being weaned on the image of magnificently brave, polite and self controlled individuals being the norm for personnel serving in these violent, dangerous and frightening conditions. Piece of Cake took the opposite tack and simply showed that kids, and let’s face it most of the fighter pilots of the period were just that really, were having to cope with stresses and threats far beyond what the target audience could conceive. Stiff upper lip, jolly japes and calm acceptance of danger might have gone down a treat amongst the war film audience of the post-war period but Piece of Cake appeared at a time when TV coverage of modern war was normal and immediate (that’s why the Vietnam War drew such opposition). The audience may not have been in a jungle or desert somewhere being attacked or amongst the attackers but they could see the blood and therefore the psychological effects on those who were the participants.

    I enjoyed Piece of Cake simply because it cut to the truth of the inexperience of young kids adjusting to fast fighting machines and their complexities; the often less than stellar performance of peace time officers thrust into commands that they were ill-equipped for; the numbing boredom and mistakes of the Phoney War and the sudden shock of reality when the Germans attacked in the west and Dunkirk then the desperate days of the Battle of Britain. Of course these young pilots were not going to react in any other way than being almost overwhelmed by events with which they struggled to cope.

    The published memoirs and the various histories of the period show that the pilots of Fighter command were not 100% perfect and that some were arrogant fools, some were cowards or personally ill-disciplined. But on the whole the majority, no matter how they managed to cope, lived and died in a manner that did ensure victory. Piece of Cake despite the necessities of dramatic licence shows how they did that and while it mightn’t at times be what we expect, or pleasant, I think it comes close to the truth. Heroes don’t wear white hats and behave like saints, they’re just ordinary imperfect human beings upon whom fate suddenly drops a load of trouble.

    Hero’s don’t always win.
    Star Wars: Empire Strikes Back is considered by some as the best of the series despite the Empires winning. This years Avengers: Infinity War also saw huge losses in the heroes of the story, which stunned audiences. It made huge amounts and I suspect will go on to become a landmark in story telling.

    I saw entire PoC on tape about 15 years ago, and while excellent story telling and character’s, it was also incredibly draining. The loss of nearly all the characters as the story develops and concludes really made me feel the hardship of those insanely brave pilots.
    But I saw a parallels in an Japanese anime too, the series Macross and Gundam had major characters who looked to be regular be suddenly killed, or in one scene a growing foreboding of “something bad” going to happen (he died very dramatically for a “cartoon”).

    The criticism you speak probably is not the somewhat motley heroes being killed off, but that they where proxies of real heroes that in our hearts we idealizes and impart angle like immortality (not that it is wrong, mind you).

    For they have slipped the surly bonds of Earth, and touched the face of God. Least not sully them. (paraphrased Magee)

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 698 total)