dark light

Flying_Pencil

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 698 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfire Scrapping or disposal #806200
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    I do not like horror films.

    in reply to: Intriguing Spitfire Image – But Where Taken? #809082
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Flying_Pencil, yours is another worthy guess, though I’m holding off on agreeing. Just for the fun of it, here is a closeup of this gentleman, on the right, compared with two known photos of Sir James Bird.

    Consider the source of light can greatly effect how a person looks, and the Spit pic the light is slightly above the camera.
    The other images the light is not the same angle.

    Sir Bird is also 60 years old, expect some facial changes.
    …which is makes difficult because the years the other images taken is not stated.

    In addition the other 2 images look to be a few generations old, probably taken off news papers and magazines rather than significantly higher quality photo medium.

    I also note how intently he is looking at something inside the cockpit.

    Not conclusive, but possibility.

    in reply to: More Rusty Stuff – Spitfire Tank? 30046 Part Number #809219
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant
    in reply to: Daks over Normandy #809227
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Very real.

    The actual lead airplane “Thats All, Brother” is planned to be there as well.

    in reply to: Intriguing Spitfire Image – But Where Taken? #809280
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Mark, the man to lower left holding on to fuselage looks like Sir James Bird.

    in reply to: PBY-N1 Nomad outrigger float bits #809395
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Great find and show!

    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Stupid tragedy.
    Way too low.
    Sad.

    I thought he was going to do a roll, but when I saw beginning of loop I knew he will hit ground.

    in reply to: RAF Celebrate The Anniversary Of Pacman #809562
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Totally non-sequitur to me, how RAF @ 100 = …that!

    Oh I can’t help myself…Spectrum is Green!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]259908[/ATTACH]

    Oh, SNAP, makes sense that Spectrum was also a all inclusive organization!
    (Always wondered about the all female “Angles” 😉 )

    in reply to: Letter/Number Codes On An L4A Grasshopper #809577
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Great ongoing story!

    in reply to: Virtual Cockpit tours: Mosquito, Mustang, Corsair…. #809581
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Excellent to see these 360* views.
    It has been decades since this technology was introduced (mid 1990’s), why it take so long?

    First cut at a Stirling virtual cockpit tour… other parts of the aircraft and videos later, plus VR.

    Just a trial – quality and content improvements later!

    Go full screen for best effect.

    https://360player.io/player/tHUsbg/

    Thats great, James!
    Something better than nothing.

    in reply to: Base closures list. #809594
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Stupid, as (nearly) all ways.

    Housing: can always build upward.

    On this side of pond, Santa Monica airport (California) is being targeted for closure by land developers, even though it is one of the busiest and most important airports in US. Anyone seriously thinking it will be made into a “park” is drinking Cool-aide.

    in reply to: Junkers 288B #816195
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Thank you folks. Mystery solved. I don’t know how I missed this one. I think I thought it was a bigger aircraft than it actually was. I’ve found that Revell did a plastic 1/32 kit of it with Werk number 310189, only 4 adrift of the wreck in the photo.

    Ju288 and He219 are pretty close to same size.

    The key to ID is the prominant dihedral in He219 tail.
    Ju is flat.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]259788[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Into Russian aircraft ? #816204
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    That Facebook page is a non-profit organization that is connected to the private collection of flying WWII aircraft in Russia, setup to help fund the restorations/operations, which includes the Russian-based Il-2, a couple Mig-3’s, three Polikarpov fighters, a PO-2 and a T-6 (and I think they’ve also branched into WWI aircraft/replicas as well) – the same entity which first announced the intention of bringing the Il-2 to Flying Legends this summer. One of their current goals is to restore a Tupolev TU-2 to fly.

    Can you tell me more about Russian ground and preserving/restoring WB’s?

    in reply to: Captured German aircraft over Duxford. #816206
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Cannot see in USA.
    ********!

    LOL, my UK “word” censored.
    Then.. HOVNO!

    in reply to: Valour In The Air – OUT NOW! #816303
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Sounds like an unacceptable level of errors
    (always some get though)

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 698 total)