dark light

Flying_Pencil

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 698 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfire Birth of a Legend (PBS America) #774760
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    did not even hear about this program!
    Looking for it naowww

    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Gotta upload what I have on this.
    I was informed the film was originally digitized by Costco (big warehouse store), and it is utter crap, but at least something!

    That Dornier is really quite surprising! Are we sure that is what it is?

    Yes.

    FE means Foreign Evaluation – not an airfield in the US

    Correct. Discovered that later. Mystic copied over an earlier message to him.

    [HR][/HR]
    OK, added some still from the film (1/22):

    Lt. Col. Morris Grayson (MD. was a doctor post war)

    Images in order:
    Our HERO himself (use a WET method)
    Morris in his office (also WET)
    A still of the VLC (VERY low cost) film digitizing (COSTCO store)
    Still from a PROFESSIONAL company using a DRY method in HD resolution (1080p) ProRes 422! Not only image much sharper, but much more of image seen!!
    Comparison of a DRY and WET scanning technique. YES, this is the same frame!! (find the dots)
    Another comparison of the Band of Brothers, WET vs DRY.

    DRY??
    WET???
    My years of researching I discovered there are 2 methods of feeding the film though the telecine.
    DRY is as you guess, running though the “gate” (the window the light projects though) in dry condition.
    WET the film enters a liquid applicator coating the film in some clear liquid (glycol?) before entering the gate. This fills in the cracks and scratch of the film so the light does not have distortion as it passes though film. The liquid immediately evaporates.

    WET had down side: sharpness is lost and so is some light intensity. Dark scenes in film become very dark.
    The WET company also applied some digital enhancement, making the result better.

    If the film was in better condition, then DRY scanning is better, but this on clearly needed a WET process.

    Some day soon will post about my adventures in this.
    Companies:
    WET by Posthouse
    DRY by MyMovieTransfer
    Both USA, and both have superb customer service!

    in reply to: Buffalo Airways Fokker DR1 #775046
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Use it for cargo operations from one side of airfield to another.

    in reply to: RAE Railway,Farnborough #775049
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Thomas, is that you??

    (sorry, could not resist)

    in reply to: Lucky escape in Turkey by Pegasus 737 #472239
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Hair raising!

    Notice no right engine (#2) on airplane?

    in reply to: Could almost be on an op! #777307
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Lovely!

    in reply to: P40s ordered by the French but delivered to the RAF #777309
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Yes I had read somewhere that about that time French aircraft had their throttle setups working in the opposite way around I.e forward for closed and backward for open. You’ve just confirmed that I hadn’t imagined it Dave

    Yes, all backwards.

    I guess the reason is, if one has hard landing, the throttle lever would be slammed forward, closed.

    in reply to: Kermits Napier. #777310
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    NICE pics!
    (saw a cut-away at Duxford)

    I think so, too. I also think, that there will never be a Sabre pulling an aircraft. But 10 years ago I also had the same opinion about the BMW 501. Obviously I was wrong.

    BMW 801.

    But the 801 is nothing unusual compared to run-of-mill radials.
    The fan at front is pretty simple too.

    Sleeve valves are the big hurdle, but there is sleeve valve radials still flying, so…

    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Very productive discussion!

    Hi everybody!

    Very interesting topic for me – as I have experienced the same challenge(s)…

    Based on my experience so far (archiving fotos for more 40 years, 25 years of which in electronic form) I would recommend two things:

    a) Don’t mix a key (unique identifier of a photo) with descriptive attributes, i.e. – as Mark12 wrote – start with 1 and number sequentially. Add all other information on a photo as additional attributes (or fields). Based on my extensive experience as a member of an organization department of a large multinational country almost all “meaningful” keys will prove as insufficient sooner or later for various reasons – so don’t try to do this.

    b) Don’t try to find a “fancy” application software for the cataloging job – stick with the simple features of the operating system (or file explorer, etc.) of your computer. Otherwise regular updates with the need for adaptation of your existing data – or even the software provider going “belly-up” – may prove an unnecessary “pain in the a..”. Using MS Office applications – like Mark12 recommended – MIGHT BE acceptable (because it is a global standard unlikely to disappear or change too much in the foreseeable future), but as somebody who had to upgrade MS Word formats at least 5 times already (about 50.000 documents in total), I would advise to be careful even with these applications!

    Generally speaking: Keep your “system” as simple as possible.

    Regards and good luck
    Thomas

    I somewhat must disagree, Thomas.

    I need the photo to have a few descriptive elements that will allow identification by name.

    That said, I do agree it would be follow to include a complete descriptive list. This is where a unique ID number will be needed.

    There is another issue, and that is if the catalog file or program are not longer accessible, then all that work will have to be either recovered, or rebuilt from scratch (and happening once is once to many).

    Maybe using the Google tools (Docs and Picasa) could be a good combination, or just Doc’s for its easy of access and portability.

    Flying Pencil, may I ask if the discussion could be broadened to include what may happen to personnel collections in the event of the untimely, or timely, demise of the owner? I don’t mean to sound morbid, but there must be many collections which have been thrown out due to no prior arrangements having been made. Regards, SFF.

    That is a good topic!
    Suggest you start a new topic for that. Never knows when something unfortunate happens.
    Cheers!

    To be continued….

    in reply to: Beaver Down In Australia 31/12/2017 #782521
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Ah, did not see that.
    Description is not that detailed (was it a 90* turn which is routine, or 180*? Where the wings pointed straight up and down, or a shallow angle?), but may be a chance it was pilot error then.

    in reply to: How Do You All Manage Your Digital Photographs? #442903
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Replying to this:

    That strikes me as extremely uneconomical! E.g.: You can get a good quality external HD with a capacity of 1TB for the price of less than 2 Sandisk or Lexar 32Gb memory cards.

    No it is not!
    Quicker just to pop a new mem-card in then go though effort of making another backup!

    You must have at least 3 copies, the working drive and 2 back ups.
    Simply saving the card once full is a backup right here, and they are pretty small so easy to store somewhere.

    Yes, yes, I did do what you said at one time, but with $10 for a 32GB SD card that is good for at least a year, it was more efficient backup wise just to just get a new SD card.

    EDIT: Let me say, I do not take enough new photos to need lots of SD cards (otherwise I would do transfer & backup, then erase to reuse). SO I use the tiny SD card as one of my 3 backup mediums (after I DO copy the images to my other back-ups).

    in reply to: Disposal of old photographs / negatives #442908
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    95%+ of an image (neg or paper) is just cellulose, paper IOW (even a negative is another form of paper).

    It is only a thin layer on that cellulose that holds the ink and the image.

    Likely not enough possibly hazardous chemicals to be concerned about. However there could be enough silver to be worth recovering? 😉

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #782614
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    Thanks for update!
    Above and beyond your usual to post here!

    o7

    By chance, now the aircraft is recovered and the area cleaned up, can sites GPS location be published?

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay 2018 #782617
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    eBay effect strikes again!

    2 months ago I came across an Do 17 part, which of course is rare as hens teeth.
    See post here.

    Well, what you know, another of the same parts showed up again just after Christmas!

    It is not the first time I see 2 unique items show up in short time.
    Pictures of a particular aircraft, for instance. Happens quite often.
    And no, I do not not think he knew of the other listing.

    He did tell me it came from same location, which is no surprise at all.

    in reply to: Kermit Visits Vancouver To See The Mars Flying Boat #782619
    Flying_Pencil
    Participant

    FAN-TASTIC!!

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 698 total)