dark light

Big_B

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 59 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Tamil Tiger Air Force? #2497841
    Big_B
    Participant

    http://lankadailynews.com/2008/10/interceptors-missile-%E2%80%98lock-on%E2%80%99-failure-jolts-slaf/

    Interceptors’ missile ‘lock on’ failure jolts SLAF

    Kelanitissa loses capacity to generate 275 mega watts: Tuesday’s failure to shoot down a single LTTE aircraft despite timely detection by radar has jolted the SLAF into investigating its limitations amidst evidence that the enemy has acquired a capability to neutralise the threat of a heat seeking missile attack.

    An authoritative source said that Chinese F7s launched from Katunayake air base had failed to zero-in-on the enemy aircraft. Chinese F7
    “Their (F7s) missile systems failed to ‘lock on with the enemy aircraft,” the source said. This would necessitate an overall review of the SLAF’s strategy, the source said. The military asserted that the LTTE could try to exploit the situation.
    The initial detection had been made north-east of Mannar at 10.18 p.m. by 2D radar installed by the Government of India at the SLAF base at Vavuniya.

    Thaladdi had come under attack within minutes after the detection, the source said.

    LTTE air craftBoth the Indian radar and a Chinese 3D radar station located in the Western Province had detected the enemy aircraft but interceptors failed to carry out a successful missile strike. 2D radar provides direction and the distance of a target whereas the Chinese radar provides even the altitude of a target.

    Last September, a heat seeking missile fired by an interceptor brought down one of the two LTTE aircraft returning to their base after attacking Vavuniya air base. Although the LTTE denied the SLAF claim, a senior military official pointed out that the LTTE had deployed only one aircraft to carry out Tuesday’s operation. Each previous raid directed at military and economic targets had involved two aircraft, the official said. “May be they are now left with one aircraft,” he speculated. But the possibility of their having additional aircraft couldn’t be ruled out, he said.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2063916
    Big_B
    Participant

    Other than the khukri or kora corvettes which are these ships that don’t have sonars??

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2064082
    Big_B
    Participant

    Expect a massive raise in defence budget and RFP for second sub-line soon.;)

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2064120
    Big_B
    Participant

    Courtesy SNaik on BR:
    http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g191/snake65/PA1401581.jpg

    Which is the other sub?

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2064417
    Big_B
    Participant

    F-35 internal anti-ship missile???

    in reply to: PAF Fizayah procurement blunders #2453833
    Big_B
    Participant

    The pschycological effect of F-104 was only in PAf’s mind. It was always a mediocre plane and managed to get shot down by a mystere. IAf pilots in 71 were more worried by Mirage-III which they considered a more potent threat that starfighter. The F-16 was countered ages ago with Mirage-2000 and mig-29s. Now pakistan is just begging due to logistic issues. The J-10 is a joke and its pakistan breaking their heads on how to counter MKI and MRCA. The J-10 won’t cut it.

    in reply to: MEKO A200 Frigates #2065228
    Big_B
    Participant

    Nice designs. I wonder if MEKO will pitch it for Indian navy’s P-17a frigate.

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2065597
    Big_B
    Participant

    The F-22p will have HQ-7 SAM’s. It would make sense to go for the same. Will US approve ESSM or SeaRAM?

    in reply to: AH-1Z and UH-1Y #2455688
    Big_B
    Participant

    Magnusta is in race but I doubt anything other than Mi-28N will be selected even if the rubbish Ah-1z (more of LCH category) or Ah-64D were competing.

    in reply to: AH-1Z and UH-1Y #2455730
    Big_B
    Participant

    The same would apply for Ah-64D. Which leaves Mi-28N, Ka-52 and eurobirds.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2066529
    Big_B
    Participant

    No fear russians have till 2011 to get it fixed. But still ahead of the imaginary CVF..has it been scrapped yet?

    in reply to: PAF Fizayah procurement blunders #2456868
    Big_B
    Participant

    India might not get stuff at friendship prices but they still get quality weapons at nearly half the western prices. Not to mention joint development of weapon systems. Though lately even France and Israel have opened up.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2066535
    Big_B
    Participant

    Latest pics of Vikramaditya

    http://picasaweb.google.ru/R.Igor.W/UfeDDK#

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2066540
    Big_B
    Participant

    http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?newsid=1198477

    Just India and US to flex naval muscle

    Japan, Singapore not part of Malabar series this year

    NEW DELHI: The Malabar sea exercise is going back to its original form of a joint Indo-US bilateral naval activity off the western coast later this week.

    The Malabar series has been underway between India and the US since the early 90s, but it took an all new dimension last year with the involvement of navies from Singapore, Australia and Japan. The regional forum of navies forced the Chinese to lodge diplomatic protests. Left parties too protested against what they perceived a showcase of a new alliance led by the US.

    Despite the scaling down of the Malabar exercises, the Left parties would still be protesting during the exercise.

    MOD officials say defence minister AK Antony shot down the Indian Navy’s proposal to include Singapore and Japan navies this year. “Only last year, something different happened… This year there is no multilateral exercise, but a bilateral one, similar to what has been happening for the last 16 years,” the minister recently said.

    The US side is expected to field its nuclear powered aircraft carrier USS Ronald Regan, nuclear submarine USS Springfield, a few other warships, and several fighters and helicopters. USS Ronald Regan is a 95,000 ton ship, among the biggest in the world, and runs on nuclear fuel.

    From the Indian side, the naval contingent is led by INS Mumbai and would comprise of a conventional submarine, several other ships, fighters, helicopters in various roles.

    Though slated to begin on October 15, the actual action begins on the 17th with the ships arriving off Goa. The US navy would field its F-18s and the IAF its Jaguars. The exercise comes just weeks after the IAF fighters returned from Exercise Red Flag at Nellis airbase in the Nevada desert. Also, a day before the US ships arrive, US army chief General George W Casey would be in New Delhi on an official visit.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2066568
    Big_B
    Participant

    http://www.timesnow.tv/NewsDtls.aspx?NewsID=18484

    Finally, Indian Navy to patrol Somali waters
    10/15/2008 7:40:47 AM
    The hijacked vessel, MT Stolt Valor

    The Indian government has finally allowed the Indian Navy to patrol the Somali waters to ensure that the safety of Indian sailors is not compromised.

    In a statement issued yesterday (October 14), the government said,” Neighbouring powers and international agencies are working with India to free the sailors.”

    The move came over a month after the Somali pirates set an ultimatum of 48 hours for paying ransom for the release of the 18 Indian sailors onboard the hijacked MT Stolt Valor.

    The angry families have been demanding proactive action from the government and want the Navy to patrol the Somalian gulf in order to escort the ship back and avoid clashes with the pirates, as it could prove counter productive.

    Seema Goyal, wife of captain of the ship Prabhat Goyal said she do not know which door to knock andcollect the money.

    “Assurances don’t work. This is the time when I want help from any quarter and solve the matter,” she added.

    She also urged the Indian government to take more initiatives. “I have never asked the government to pay ransom. I want the government to take initiatives and pressurise the Japanese
    government to get our people back home soon,” she said.

    The seafarers on board MT Stlot Valor have been held hostage by the pirates who hijacked the cargo ship on September 15.

    The ship is owned by a Japanese company and managed by Fleet Marine Ltd in Mumbai. The hijackers had earlier demanded a ransom of USD six million for the release of the crew and have now come down to USD two million.

    The Somalian pirates have seized more than two dozen ships this year off the Horn of Africa.

    Apart from the Valor, pirates have seized MV Faina – a Ukrainian ship loaded with weapons. US warships have surrounded Faina to prevent pirates from unloading the weapons. NATO is also sending seven ships to the treacherous waters where the Faina is being held, and the Russian missile cruiser Intrepid is on its way to rescue the loaded Fiana.

    But there is a glimmer of hope to the family of the sailors, as in the last three months Somalian pirates have freed the crew of at least three vessels which they hijacked.

    Yesterday, the pirates freed a cargo ship with 11 crew members, held for five days, after losing an offensive launched by the authorities to free the ship.

    Four days ago, pirates freed 20 Filipino seamen who were held for more than 80 days.

    Pirates also released 29 Iranian crew members and their cargo ship hijacked off Somalia’s coast in late July.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 59 total)