dark light

Big_B

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 59 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: IAF – News & Discussion #2459959
    Big_B
    Participant

    Good. Should make it easier for IAF to select Mi-28N.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2067644
    Big_B
    Participant

    http://rutube.ru/tracks/774684.html?v=210243b509e111288e039301a0dd35ec

    The clip at 1:09 min has a schematic of the new krivaks. Its grainy but I couldn’t spot the single arm launchers

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2067736
    Big_B
    Participant

    LIke? VLS Shtil-1?

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2067850
    Big_B
    Participant

    THey launched brahmaputra without SAM’s they are capable of launching Kolkota with just barak-1 and then plugging in Barak-2’s.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2067926
    Big_B
    Participant

    AFAIK the second batch Talwars wil get Brahmos rather than Club but otherwise little difference in armaments. IRRC P15A will be the first to receive VL Shtil.

    There was a report on RT sometime back on the launch of new Talwars. The CG shown clearly showed VLS Shtil not single arm launchers.

    in reply to: IAF – News & Discussion #2461104
    Big_B
    Participant

    IAF will never buy C-17 rest assured. They will most likely order the Il-76 MF.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2068063
    Big_B
    Participant

    The newer talwars I thought were getting VLS Shtil-1. Why not the same for p-17’s?

    in reply to: French Military Aviation Questions #2461929
    Big_B
    Participant

    Thats not an eye. It represents the glass canopy and probably meant to warn where the canopy breaks off during ejection.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2068157
    Big_B
    Participant

    What about P-17’s? Will they have this or Shtil-1?

    in reply to: Modern Military Aviation News from around the world – II #2463638
    Big_B
    Participant

    The article seems bogus considering 2052 is AESA and no MMR. It might be 2032.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode V #2465812
    Big_B
    Participant

    J-10 higher quality :rotfl:. Can I have some of what you are smoking. As long as IAF stays away from sewer hornet they should be fine. The F-16’s are a joke compared to MKI..the lesser said about Jf-17 and mirage-3 fleet the better. The numbers do matter which means Tejas needs to be inducted in numbers starting 2010. MKI+Rafale can hold the fort well against anything china may have in the next 2 decades and PAK-FA after that.

    in reply to: Britain considers JSF pullout #2466284
    Big_B
    Participant

    This brings up a possible scenario where Saudi Arabia’s 72 Eurofighters face off against Israel’s 75 F-35s. It would be an interesting matchup.

    Why? Any sane person would expect the F-35 to win hands down. EF carrying missiles will be spotted miles away and will be at a disadvantage.

    in reply to: Britain considers JSF pullout #2466318
    Big_B
    Participant

    It better not be based on 25 aircrafts. Would come to a whopping 600 mil per pop.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2068995
    Big_B
    Participant

    I confrm, but not about the deal period. There is a clause that the sub should be returned to Russia immediately “if force majeure circumstances arise”. Apart from the obvious (war and the like), the deal lists “operational requirements of the Russian Navy and High Command” as a case in point. The deal is renewable only if the Russian Navy agrees and necessitates another lease deal. The lease deal is explicitely a research deal and not a combat duty lease. But otherwise you’re right: it’s not the first time it happens anyway, in the good old Soviet days the Indians got a lot of experience exactly through such deals.

    What other experiences? Other than the charlie class Chakra nothing else was leased by IN. Adm Mehta did mention that the akula were being leased for training perhaps till the ATV hits the water.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode V #2467292
    Big_B
    Participant

    Well since no pics exist yet of this vaporware, how confident are we that it will actually fly next year and match up to F-22 or even F-35? I can’t see GOI or IAF putting any money without seeing how the russian version performs.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 59 total)