dark light

Big_B

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 14 posts - 46 through 59 (of 59 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2069119
    Big_B
    Participant

    http://www.hindu.com/2008/09/29/stories/2008092955681400.htm

    Keel-laying of indigenous aircraft carrier in December

    S. Anandan

    Construction right on course using integrated hull outfitting method

    Kochi: Laying of keel for India’s first Indigenous Aircraft Carrier (IAC), originally named Air Defence Ship (ADS), will take place at the Cochin Shipyard in December this year when a major construction block will be lowered into the building bay.

    “We are looking forward to completing close to 400 of the total 900 blocks by the time the keel is laid. And the tonnage would be about 8,000 tonnes,” sources told The Hindu.

    Despite the initial hiccups caused by non-availability of warship-grade steel, the construction is right on course using the integrated hull outfitting and painting method.

    It is concurrent engineering with regard to design and construction, and steel is sourced “primarily” from the Steel Authority of India (SAIL).

    “The idea is to launch it in 2010 when it would have completed some 20,000 tonnes, including hull, as it cannot be launched at a higher displacement from the building bay. After about a year’s building in the refit dock, it would be launched again when every major component and everything underwater would be in place. Only outfitting would remain. If everything goes as per the CCS (Cabinet Committee on Security) plan, it should touch the waters in 2013,” sources said.

    Originally, the carrier was to have been built by 2012. But a delay in arrival of indigenous steel — after efforts to import steel from Russia ran aground — caused it to be a year behind schedule. After steel was cut for the construction in April, 2005, there was considerable delay.

    “But the country got a definite shot in the arm as we have been able to indigenously manufacture ABA-grade quality steel (which is six times stronger than the steel used for building ships). This will stand us in good stead when we embark on construction of the second carrier soon after this. Besides, this has tremendously brought down the overall construction cost,” said a Navy officer associated with warship production.

    With crucial inputs from the Hyderabad-based Defence Metallurgical Research laboratory, and overall supervision of the Naval Design Bureau, SAIL, along with Heavy Engineering Corporation, Ranchi, Krishna Industries, Nagpur and Bajrang Alloys, Raipur, has been able to “open a new frontier” in carrier building technology by fashioning the requisite quality steel, a Navy engineer said.

    The Naval Materials Research laboratory, Mumbai, developed the welding technology besides carrying out corrosion-proofing of welded steel. Although about 4,000 tonnes of bulb bars required by the vessel is imported from Russia, a relatively smaller quantity is rolled and readied by Krishna Industries.

    As per the original plan, the carrier would have the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) and the ALH (Advanced Light Helicopter) Dhruv in its fleet of 30 assorted aircraft besides MiG 29 K and Ka-31.

    “By the time the IAC is commissioned, the naval Light Combat Aircraft (LCA Tejas) would also be ready,” said a Navy engineer. Further, with the Navy now on the lookout for replacement for its ageing Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) helicopter Sea King beyond the ALH, some changes in the carrier fleet composition are anticipated. Russian News agency, RIA Novosti, has reported that India would be buying 30 more MiG 29 Ks and two-seater MiG 29 KUBs apart from the 12 it would receive as per a 2004 contract.

    “The STOBAR (Short Take-Off But Arrested Recovery) carrier will have a versatile deck from which any aircraft, MiG 29 downwards, could operate,” said a Navy officer.

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2069274
    Big_B
    Participant

    I don’t think they are looking for destroyers but since the type-22’s will go out in a decade they will need replacements and FREMM’s seem to be a good addition though costly.

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2069324
    Big_B
    Participant

    Would Brazil go for KDX-II with american radars and weapons? I thought they wanted to buy 6 FREMM’s?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IV #2468976
    Big_B
    Participant

    So who cares?? As long as PAK-FA MKI ends up in IAF everyone is happy including fanboys. Given the incompetence shown by ADA and HAL in making Tejas I wouldn’t hold my breath for the MCA.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2069496
    Big_B
    Participant

    http://www.deccanherald.com/Content/Sep242008/national2008092491783.asp

    Private firms to make warships
    From Kalyan Ray, DH News Service, New Delhi:
    Opening its doors, the Centre will allow private ports to manufacture five offshore patrol vessels for the Navy at a cost of Rs 5,000 crore.

    The defence acquisition council, headed by Defence Minister A K Antony, approved five OPVs for the Navy last week, which will be procured through the “make” category of the defence procurement policy of 2008 and for the first time Indian Navy is looking at the private sector for meeting its requirements.

    In a marked departure from the past, this time the options will not be limited to State-owned dockyards under the defence ministry. Private players are being pursued to bid for the request for proposal (RFP), which is expected in four months.

    Three private ship building yards — the Pipavav Shipyard Limited, ABG Shipyard Limited and L&T Shipyard are being scrutinised for building naval vessels.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2069499
    Big_B
    Participant

    A not so reliable blog but was wondering if anyone knew the specs of the SMX-21 and S-800 sub??

    http://livefist.blogspot.com/2008/09/prasun-k-sengupta-indian-navy-hunts-for.html

    in reply to: Mig-29K #2469903
    Big_B
    Participant

    Would require too much work wouldn’t it? But yes would have actually allowed Su-33’s to take off. E-2’s cannot take off due to lack of catapult not size restriction.

    in reply to: Mig-29K #2469953
    Big_B
    Participant

    AWACS?? I thought it was dealt with that E-2 cannot fly of gorky or the new vikrant. That would be a potent force multiplier along with AESA radar and TVC.

    in reply to: Mig-29K #2470133
    Big_B
    Participant

    IF the AESA etc is readythen the eurobirds also get knocked out of the competition.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2069642
    Big_B
    Participant

    Austin, IF I remember correctly IAF chief had mentioned 2017-18 as timeframe when Pak-FA will join IAF. That fits well with the IAF scheme. In the mean time they need to finish Inducting the MKI’s and replacing the Mig-21/23/27 older Jags etc with Tejas and MRCA. So even though prototype PAK-FA for IAF may fly by 2014-15 it will only come to IAF by 2018 odd. I believe even the RuAf will only get their planes by 2012-13.

    in reply to: IAF – News & Discussion #2470145
    Big_B
    Participant

    There are only 3 choices the EH-101,Ch-47 and Mi-26 variant if available. IAF already has infrastucture for Mi-26 but they are buying AW-101 for VIP transport so hopefully it should be EH-101. Unless the russian-french proposal for a Mi-26 variant chopper goes forward I don’t see it being seriously considered.

    in reply to: Mig-29K #2470153
    Big_B
    Participant

    http://livefist.blogspot.com/2008/09/prasun-k-sengupta-navy-to-order-more.html

    Not sure how reliable the source is but something caught my eye.

    For the second batch of 29 MiG-29K/KUBs, the IN will soon decide whether to equip them with the Tikhomirov NIIR-built BARS-29 passive phased-array X-band radar, or Phazotron JSC’s Zhuk-AE active phased-array radar.

    Armaments package for the MiG-29K/KUB includes an internal 30mm GSh-301 cannon located in the port wing’s leading edge root extension; Vympel’s R-77 BVR-AAM and R-73E within-visual-range air combat missile; Zvesda-Strela’s (now part of Tactical Missiles Corp JSC) 130km-range Kh-35 Uran-E anti-ship cruise missiles; Kh-31AD Krypton supersonic anti-ship cruise missile, which has a length of 4.8 metres and 110km-range; and the Kh-31AM/PM antiradiation missile, equipped with a wavebandspecific seeker, which has a length of 5.2 metres and a range of 170km. The Kh-31AD is fitted with a Leninetz-designed U-505 passive radar seeker. For medium-range standoff attack using precision-guided munitions, use will be made of the Sagem Défense Sécurité-built AASM family of laser-/GPS-guided bombs that will make use of RAFAEL-built Litening-3 target acquisition/designation pods. Under the IN’s block development roadmap, RAC-MiG and Klimov will upgrade the RD-33MK to the RD-33MKV standard, which will deliver 81.4kN of thrust with afterburning, will weigh 1,145kg, will incorporate single-crystal turbine blades, and will be equipped with a swivelling nozzle can be deflected by up to 15 degrees in any direction. Thrust vectoring will be achieved by controlling a short inner segment of the nozzle. Also to be replaced will be the Zhuk-ME with most probably the Zhuk-AE active phasedarray radar, which will weigh 280kg, have an antenna diameter of 700mm, will contain 1,064 transmit/receive modules, have a vertical antenna reflector that can be directed 20 degrees upwards and sideways, have a power consumption of 6kW, have a target detection range of 200km, and will track 30 airborne targets simultaneously and engage eight of them. The Zhuk-AE will have a guaranteed service life of 10,000 hours, and its prototype has to date achieved the 900-hour mark.

    in reply to: IAF – News & Discussion #2470486
    Big_B
    Participant

    Mig-21/23/29 I would guess. Mirage-2000’s were primarily for SEAD. Jags and Mig-27’s for CAS. IAF had a max of 10-12 Mig-25R’s. What do you mean by action? They used to regularly cross into pakistan and tibet for recon missions but except for the instance in 1997 when the pilot deliberately made a sonic boom while exiting pakistani airspace you will not find any open source documents detailing their operations. They were retired in 2007 I believe after 25 years of service.

    in reply to: IAF – News & Discussion #2470491
    Big_B
    Participant

    IAF Mig-25’s were the Mig-25R version I believe. They were exclusively used for recon. No chance of them seeing any combat. They may have been used in kargil 1999 for recon purposes along with the canberras.

Viewing 14 posts - 46 through 59 (of 59 total)