dark light

Merv_P

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Unknown Sukhoi strategic bomber revealed! #2474377
    Merv_P
    Participant

    Nice one! 🙂

    Was the test pilot’s surname (‘Ilyushin’) also a clue, or am I reading too much into the article where you just selected some Russian aeronautical names?

    in reply to: Soviet/Russian Oddball designs #2567530
    Merv_P
    Participant

    A TsAGI study of the 1950s which greatly influenced Myasishchev and Tupolev.

    I’m bumping a two-year-old post, but Jozef Gatial has an impression of this design here:

    http://www.planespictures.com/data/6Rusia/Tupolev/Tu-135_sc1.jpg

    in reply to: How would u modernize your favorite aircraft? #2589465
    Merv_P
    Participant

    the Tu-22 Blinder..
    (snip)
    i would do this to the Blinder enyway….. 😉

    So would I. Add to this; a reduction in crew from 3 to 2 – for a safer, roomier cockpit and made possible by default with upgraded avionics.

    in reply to: Harrier III? F-35B alternative fantasy #2562019
    Merv_P
    Participant

    Here’s a variation on the twin-boom configuration from the early ’80s; the HS P1214.3

    in reply to: Faked apollo Mission to Moon? #2584843
    Merv_P
    Participant

    It would have been unthinkable even a couple of decade back for
    earthlings to even consider the possibilities that there’re these lakes, rivers, mudslides,
    Katrina force windstorms and more, which mirrors almost that of the earth and which is so similar
    and so close to home in one of Jupitors many moons. Therefore…

    .

    Which one of Jupiter’s moons is it that has these features? This sounds more like Titan to me.

    in reply to: F-19A Specter #2591324
    Merv_P
    Participant

    They’re an interesting slice of history – essentially, they’re what the 1980s thought stealth fighters should have looked like. The most accurate was probably the Italeri kit of the fictional Mig 37 ‘Ferret’ – that got the idea of facted design correct, at least.

    in reply to: New Strategic Bomber for the U.S. Air Force #2593209
    Merv_P
    Participant

    Here’s what LM’s line of thinking is likely to produce with a FB-22 in the background poster…

    Nice looking design. Are there any other images of it available (an enlargement of the other picture on the poster, below the FB-22, for example)?

    in reply to: The less than famous loosers…. #2601971
    Merv_P
    Participant

    Quoted text from Bill Sweetman’s F-22 Raptor. Motorbooks 1998. ISBN 0-7603-0484-X

    “It was one of the heavier ATF designs, and its performance was not promising. McDonnell Douglas was shocked to be placed fifth in the evaluation, behind Boeing.”

    “Runner-up to Lockheed and Northrop was General Dynamics, with a tailless delta design that reflected the success of the arrow-winged F-16XL”.

    You’re right; I realised the mistake a while after I’d posted.

    in reply to: The less than famous loosers…. #2602270
    Merv_P
    Participant

    McDonnell Douglas ATF proposal: third place behind the YF-22 and YF-23. It must be pretty galling to be third in a two-horse race.

    in reply to: Hawker P1134 #2638968
    Merv_P
    Participant

    Josef Gatial now has images of the P1134 as well, at:

    http://www.planespictures.com/index.php?c=1&t=1

    The odd thing is; there’s nothing else at all on this aircraft anywhere (at least via Google) apart from the above images and this thread. Even the Tony Buttler book, which I’m assuming is the one GDL means, doesn’t mention it. You’d have thought with those specs. it would have a higher profile.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)