Any idea why the middle prop was feathered after landing?
My guess would be that the roof of the cockpit opens up to allow someone to act as a lookout or help out with mooring. Personally I wouldn’t want that prop turning while doing that job!
wasn’t BA formed from BOAC and BEA or soemthing?
Correct. Two big state-owned airlines were merged to create an even bigger state-owned airline. Imagine the amount of paperwork they could create that way! 😀
Already noted in this thread: http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=25244
The first posting includes a link to a video as well.
Non-Spitfire free post
To back up Daz’s story: I found this in a pub window in Canterbury two years ago. My better half agreed that being Dutch and having an aeronautical background justified taking a photo of it. 😀
Images and video of the arrival on the Brooklands Museum pages: http://www.concordesst.com/brooklands/news.html
Indeed no Virgin colours for this aircraft, but the historically correct BA scheme. Which will make it the only ex-BA Concorde that will not carry the Chatham Dockyard colours.
Yes, the tail is there as well, also a lot of other bits to make it a complete Concorde again. Right now it looks like a 1/1 Airfix kit though.
Funnily enough I’ve always interpreted that badge in a different way. In the second photo she’s parked in front of a hangar that housed a company called Fokker Services Eindhoven. Now they may not have been there yet when the Cat was parked there, but I’ve always assumed that they stuck that badge on the aircraft.
From the photos it is clear though that she carries the same colours as the North Weald Cat. Does anybody know what company once operated both these two aircraft and perhaps a few more too?
Thanks for that Cestrian! Do you have any idea what FSE used her for? Although I’ve spent a lot of time around Eindhoven airfield it was all after the Cat had left so I never got to hear the story.
Edit: found out where she is now: http://www.luftfart.museum.no/Engelsk/Exhibitions/PBY-5A.htm
I remember that too, but the rest of the inside is still bare. There are a lot of other bits that will be needed to create a complete Concorde.
Indeed the differences between the Il-62 and VC10 are clear if you know what to look for. But I still cannot figure out which airframe could’ve been there at the time. As I mentioned the only flying examples in 2002 were RAF ones, so unless they temporarily painted one white for some undercover stuff I cannot find an answer to this puzzle.
One thing I’ve just tried is searching Airliners.net for any likely suspects. I first tried searching for ‘Egypt’ and ‘2002’ and that didn’t give me much. When I tried the same with 2001 as the year I got this photo: http://www.airliners.net/open.file/233251/L/
Obviously an Il-62 that has been sitting there for some time (it’s an ex-Interflug example which has also been in storage in Kiev in 1997). It does look complete to me though, so even though we’ve now got two sightings of a VC10, it would still make more sense to me if it would’ve been this aircraft that was spotted. Perhaps it was sold on and repainted white for its new owner?
As for which VC10 it could have been, have a look at this page on my site: http://www.vc10.net/Data/vickers_vc10_prodnumbers.html It lists all the VC10s built with their eventual fate, for more details have a look in this section: http://www.vc10.net/history_section.html where there is some more info on how certain airframes met their end. For me the conclusion is still ‘impossible’ but if you can prove me wrong, then please do so!! 😎
Thanks for that Steve! It does shed some more light on the issue, but I still cannot see how a VC10 with a reg like that could have been there in 2002. The registration format you describe matches some registrations that were once carried by VC10s, but all of those have either been scrapped or are now flying for the RAF.
These are the matching registrations:
7Q-YKH Air Malawi 1974-1979, a/c scrapped in 1994
5N-ABD Nigeria Airways 1969, a/c written off in crash 1969
9G-ABO Ghana Airways 1964 – 1980, withdrawn from use, stored at Prestwick and scrapped for spares for RAF use.
9G-ABP Ghana Airways 1965 – 1968, leased to MEA and destroyed in Israeli commando raid in 1968
5X-UVA East African Airways 1966 – 1972, destroyed in take off accident
5H-MMT EAA 1966 – 1977, now flying as ZA147 with RAF 101 Sqn
5Y-ADA EAA 1967 – 1977, now flying as ZA148 with RAF 101 Sqn
5X-UVJ EAA 1969 – 1977, now flying as ZA149 with RAF 101 Sqn
5H-MOG EAA 1970 – 1977, now flying as ZA150 with RAF 101 Sqn
Basically there are no complete VC10 fuselages left anywhere in the world, other than those flying with the RAF or the four examples that are in museums.
Which leaves us with an interesting puzzle….
Concorde bits then:
Tailcone:
Thrust reverser and tailpipes:
Olympus rear end:
Olympus front end:
That’s all that we managed to see of the white lady.
Loads! How many do you want? 😀
VC10, lovely old thing. Saw a rather delapidated civvie example sitting on the ramp at Cairo a couple of years ago. No idea who owns it, whether it’s airworthy, or even whether it still exists now.
Steve, would you happen to have any more details about that? As far as I know there should not have been a VC10 there as the last civil one touched down in 1987 with all the others accounted for. It couldn’t have been an Il-62 perhaps?
Takes some getting used to, but we’ll get there.
I do find that I’m suddenly not able to post attachments anymore due to a storage capacity limit. Was that in place on the old version as well? Or is this something new? Some great photos have been posted on here, and I think it would be a shame if most of them would have to be deleted again, although I can understand the reasons.