dark light

mark_pilkington

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 706 through 720 (of 1,652 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Thruxton Jackaroos #1106645
    mark_pilkington
    Participant

    .
    G-AOIO is under long term restoration in Victoria Australia, while the former VH-KRK (serial number T5616) was exported back to the UK in 2004 and now flies as G-APAJ.

    regards

    Mark Pilkington

    in reply to: Dakota G-AMPZ damaged in Germany (2010) #1109833
    mark_pilkington
    Participant

    .
    Its great thats no one was badly injured as it was obviously a significant incident, but unfortunately the damage to the airframe looks terminal?

    The left hand side, including wing and engine appear intact, but it looks like there is some damage to the nose of the aircraft (I assume the perimeter fence/gate impacted the nose?).

    The tail wheel and leg has been torn out, perhaps explaining why the rudder is so violently out of place? (control cables ripped out with leg?)

    The right hand wing/centre-section seems to have a hit a very solid fence/gate post, the engine seems torn off the centre-section? and the remaining
    portion and right hand wing appear to have torn away from the fuselage?

    It may just be the photo? but there does seem to be wrinkling of the fuselage above the centre-section wing root?

    A very costly and substantial rebuild and parts replacement?
    if viable, or possible at all?

    regards

    Mark Pilkington

    in reply to: Thunderbird, anyone? #1112948
    mark_pilkington
    Participant

    .
    I think I will pass on this one and wait for the next one to come up, I have always considered Thunderbird 2 to be more versatile, it comes with all those pods, and interesting things like the mole etc

    smiles

    Mark Pilkington

    in reply to: Austrailian & Canadian Forum members – #1121132
    mark_pilkington
    Participant

    .
    The RSL is the peak returned serviceman organisation and an obvious point of contact, another smaller but specialist organisation also worth contacting is the RAAF Association which has branches in each state.

    http://www.raafa.org.au/structure/index.html

    Also worth contacting is the relevent independant Squadron associations that are affiliated with RAAFA, these normally have their own newsletters to directly access their members, ie former crews, however age is rapidly thinning out their ranks and I think the Lancaster Squadrons Association have already dis-banded, so are state based elements of the Catalina Squadron Association, along with Pacific war squadrons such as the Beaufighter 31 Squadron association, unfortunately you may have left such an endeavour a bit too late to really access their membership.

    http://www.raafa.org.au/structure/independant-squadron-associations.pdf

    Of those the Odds Bods association remains the most likely relevent one to approach?

    You may find the RAAF Museum at Point Cook, or the Australian War Memorial in Canberra, might hold personal photo albums of crews in squadrons based at your site of interest? and I would suggest you contact them direct.

    I would agree that the ABC might be the most appropriate news organisation to seek assistance in putting out a call for information.

    regards

    Mark Pilkington

    in reply to: Short Stirling #1126799
    mark_pilkington
    Participant

    .
    The elusive motherload of Stirling wreckage still attracts my interest, I found these two interesting records on the 214 squadron page:

    Stirling Mark III BF516 PX-E

    BF516 was a Stirling Mk III of 214 Sqn lost on the way back from a raid on Nuremberg by 653 aircraft on the night of 10 / 11 August 1943. The aircraft was coded ‘PX-E’ which was a little unusual as most 214 Squadron aircraft were coded ‘BU-‘. PX was the ‘C’ Flight Squadron code.
    They were based at Chedburgh in Suffolk. The port outer engine cut when they were 5 miles west of Nuremberg and nearly caught fire when the pilot attempted to re-start it so the propellor was feathered (blades turned to reduce drag). The aircraft then strayed off course on the way home and they lost a 2nd engine over France. The crew questioned if they should bale out but decided against that, instead they would try to get home.
    They then ran out of fuel and had to ditch into Pevensey Bay off Bexhill. All were rendered unconscious in the crash but F/S Hall was the first to recover and immediately began to try to get his crew out. Two crewmen (Sgts Buckle and Smith) were killed and the other five men were subsequently rescued by a Sea Rescue dinghy and brought ashore. Robert Moorby was taken to Naval Sick Quarters in Lewes, where he stayed for 2 weeks. The rest of the crew went back to the Squadron.

    There is a letter of thanks to the Air Sea Rescue Launch Captain from Robert Moorby in a small museum at Breznett, near New Romney in Kent, along with parts of the Stirling.

    Date of loss : 11 August 1943

    Crew of Stirling Mark III BF516 PX-E consisted of :

    Sgt Kenneth Ronald Buckle, Flight Engineer, KIA
    FS Harry Ernest Hall BEM, 1436050, Pilot, Royal Air Force Volunteer Reserve, Nationality : United Kingdom, KIA 22 September 1943, Aged 21
    Sgt J Hanna, Mid Upper Gunner
    Sgt Robert Victor Moorby, NCO 1287570 COM 185918, Wireless Operator, Nationality : United Kingdom
    Sgt G Parnell, 1579972, Mid Upper Gunner, Nationality : United Kingdom, POW 22 September 1943
    Sgt A F Short, Bomb Aimer
    Sgt Eric Ronald Smith, Navigator, KIA

    Source : Nightjar Newsletter Autumn 2003 and Robert Moorby and Shirley Whitlock and Ian Hunt

    Date record last updated : 5 August 2009

    Stirling Mark III EF445 BU-J

    The crew of EF445, coded BU-J consisted of:

    1485104 F/Sgt. G.A. Atkinson, Captain & Pilot. (missing).
    1388280 Sgt. H.J. Friend, Bomb-Aimer.
    1807915 Sgt. D.C. Hughes, Flight Engineer.
    1513213 Sgt. W.B. Edwards, Navigator.
    1892607 Sgt. R.L. Bouttell, Mid-Upper Gunner.
    1368303 Sgt. J.C.Wilson, Wireless-Operator.
    R.79844 Sgt. W. Sweeney, Rear-Gunner. (wounded & missing).

    The above-named formed the crew of a Stirling aircraft detailed to bomb Berlin on the night of 22nd/23rd November 1943 ( 22/11/1943 ). Just before they reached the target area the oil pressure on the port outer engine began to drop and the captain noticed that the propeller was revolving at excessive speed. He decided to complete the bombing run and the Bomb-Aimer sighted and released the bombs correctly one minute after E.T.A. dangerously low and the propeller was feathered to prevent a seizure wit the result that the aircraft was losing height. At 9,000 ft. it was dropping into icing cloud and the pilot restarted the engine to gain more height for crossing a bad front. The engine started but had to be stopped almost immediately to prevent it catching fire and the propeller then failed to refeather but continued to “windmill”. The aircraft lost height steadily until it was only 1500 ft. above ground at a position given by the Navigator as 20 miles east of Hanover. Near this place, the aircraft was engaged by “flak” which wounded the Rear-Gunner in the right leg but he refused to leave the turret.

    The Wireless-Operator sent out an S.O.S. at about 21.45 hours and repeated it until it was acknowledged. It was picked up at 22.30 as a very faint signal and he was given a fix. From then onwards, although reception was very bad, he maintained communication with the ground sending the height, speed, course and D.R. position, obtained from Navigator, at intervals.

    Near the Zuider Zee, the aircraft was picked up by the searchlights which were attacked by the gunners and, crossing the island at about 50 ft. the aircraft was again engaged by flak and searchlights; fifteen to twenty five of the latter were shot at by the gunners and doused. A F.W. 190 intercepted the Stirling but was shot down in flames by the Rear-Gunner.

    When the Flight-Engineer reported there was only 10 minutes of fuel remaining, the captain ordered the crew to take up their ditching stations. Because of icing, a head wind and the wind-milling airscrew, the speed had been very low. Information of their plight was signaled to the ground station and the aircraft was fixed accurately as the Operator pressed his key down when the aircraft ditched halfway across the North Sea at 00.34 hours. Prior to ditching , the Captain called out the height of the aircraft as it approached the water and the Navigator gave him a surface………???????

    The aircraft bounced off a swell and then made a very heavy impact with the water which caused the nose to sink in and the fuselage to break in half. The pilot was trapped in the nose and went under as the aircraft broke in two. The Navigator jumped into the dinghy and dragged in the Mid-Upper Gunner from the water. They heard the Wireless Operator calling, paddled up to him and helped him on board. The Rear-Gunner, who had been observed to jump into the sea was also heard to call but they failed to find him and he was not picked up. After drifting for about an hour blowing their whistles, they heard an answering whistle, in the darkness, and eventually picked up the Flight Engineer from his “K” type dinghy. When the Stirling hit the sea, the Bomb-Aimer got out of the astro hatch but was swept into the sea by the waves. The Flight Engineer passed him a “K” dinghy which was swept away. The Bomb-Aimer re-entered the almost submerged fuselage, found another “K” dinghy, held his breath and swam out again as the aircraft sank, three minutes after ditching. He inflated the dinghy and climbed in, but although he heard other members of the crew shouting and answered, he was too weak to paddle towards the sound and lost touch with them. After sunrise, he hoisted a red sail and fired a star cartridge when an Air-Sea Rescue Hudson approached.

    The Hudson crew dropped smoke floats alongside and he was shortly after taken on board a high speed launch which continued the search and picked up the other four surviving members of the crew from the big dinghy about 40 minutes later. The Captain and Rear-Gunner could not be found.

    THE ABOVE IS AN OFFICIAL RAF DOCUMENT POSTED IN MEMORIAL TO GEORGE ATKINSON BY HIS FAMILY, THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT IS ON THIS SITE UNDER PERSONNEL

    Both long shots after this time in salt water, and one is like fishing for a needle in a haystack, but it would seem fishing for a deep sea Stirling, would seem more worthwhile than a third Halifax?

    regards

    Mark Pilkington

    in reply to: My other love #1131238
    mark_pilkington
    Participant

    excellent to see she survives and is being restored, named after one one of Robin Hoods band of merry men I assume?

    smiles and grabs my coat lol

    Mark Pilkington

    in reply to: Catalina Flaps #1152474
    mark_pilkington
    Participant

    .
    The Catalina does’nt have any flaps at all, as was the norm for aircraft design when it was first developed in 1933 to meet a 1934 US Navy specification,

    It was considered obsolete by 1939 and the PBY-4 was expected to be the final USN order, however an RAF order for the PBY-5 with its gun blisters re-established the type and renewed orders from the USN, USAF, RAAF etc resulting in the type becoming the most numerous and successful flying boat design ever built.

    However none of the later models ever added flaps, most likely as the airframe had enough “built in” drag with the floats as you point out, and the large wing provided sufficient lift already, and its wet runways created “short” landings in anycase, removing most of the early reasons for the development of flaps.

    The Boeing 247 of 1933 similarly did’nt have flaps in its original design, with the DC-2 of 1934 being the first modern airliner to introduce flaps, the 247D was produced with flaps to try and compete with the DC-2.

    As I recall the DH84 Dragon developed in 1932 did not have flaps, and the DH89 Rapide of 1934 introduced them in 1936?

    Similarly I seem to recall the early Ansons were built without flaps and introduced on the GR1 aircraft.

    Regards

    Mark Pilkington

    in reply to: D-day for Bomber Command Memorial #1155630
    mark_pilkington
    Participant

    The BBC story on this, mentions that the entrance will be made from melted down aluminium from a Halifax bomber that was shot down during the war, and the carving will be of this crew.
    Does anyone have any further details on this part of the story?

    I know there is a constant debate on this forum over the issue of restoring the RAF Museum’s Halifax W1048 or leaving it “as found”, but I think melting her down to make a doorway is going a bit too far!

    smiles

    Mark Pilkington

    in reply to: Film trailer – Australian buried aircraft #1157494
    mark_pilkington
    Participant

    Correct Robbo. I stand admonished.

    admit it Moggy, you meant “Loathe”!!!

    I always have an “intense aversion” to edit the titles people use unless the spelling is too ghastly, it has no capital letter, or worse still it is ALL IN CAPITALS.

    Smiles

    Mark Pilkington

    in reply to: Film trailer – Australian buried aircraft #1157587
    mark_pilkington
    Participant

    .
    I thought gliders were “aircraft trailers” and they’re difficult to reverse up the driveway too!

    Smiles

    Mark Pilkington

    in reply to: Film trailer – Australian buried aircraft #1157951
    mark_pilkington
    Participant

    http://www.brokenwings.com.au/images/index_148.gif

    “No where else in the world does a story exist even remotely similar to this one” – except up the road at Bundaberg?!!

    The mushroom clouds from Woomera were tracked north east over Queensland and researchers now have proof of what it does when it contaminates the water supply – smiles

    However its well known in Bundaberg that all 12 “missing” Oakey Spitfires were actually flown to Bundaberg and taken into the vast and secret bunker along with a P40, a couple of zeros, munitions and bedpans, where they remain hidden to this day as part of a great defence department and local council conspiracy!

    I will be happy to be proved wrong in my scepticism, but we Australian’s are pretty lazy, why bury something when there’s a very “big paddock” to hide it in?

    smiles

    Mark Pilkington

    in reply to: Plans to Fly a Mirage in Australia #1158924
    mark_pilkington
    Participant

    Used to be one alongside the hangar at Avalon in the late ’90’s when I was on 747’s there. Could have gone to Geelong Tech ? Dunno ? Worth a check. cya

    A3-45 is under cover and on display at the Australian National Aviation Museum at Moorabbin Airport.

    http://www.aarg.com.au/images/GAF_Mirage_IIIO_A3-45_Pic1Med.jpg

    The museum’s Mirage A3-45 was built in 1967 and served with every RAAF unit that flew the type before it was retired in 1986 and transferred to the Aeronautical Research Laboratories in Melbourne for test purposes. It was later transferred to Aerospace Technologies of Australia (successor to G.A.F) at Avalon, the company passed the aircraft to the Museum in 1993.

    Regards

    Mark Pilkington

    in reply to: Lancaster Fuel C0ck Reqd @ BBMF #1090826
    mark_pilkington
    Participant

    Peter,

    I shot down to the museum as a break from a long day at work yesterday late afternoon, but the cxentre-section is now wrapped up tight in tarpaulins etc to protect it from the weather, and it was pouring rain when I arrived and there was little enthusiasm to get soaked while we unwrapped the whole thing.

    After a very late night at work I have returned home and this morning had a closer look at my photos.

    I have a number of photos of the C-C spars, none show the fuel c0ck in place on either side, but to be fair, they were general shots and a few dont include the lower spar boom.

    However there does seem to be a general lack of fuel system components in the leading edge ie the main selector cocks etc, with apparant cut hoses visible, suggesting the Lincoln has been stripped of such components by one of the earlier “Lancaster” owners as spares for those airworthy restorations.

    If the BBMF cant find any other sources I can get the centre-section unwrapped to confirm what exists, but at this stage I consider we dont have the items.

    (I assume there are only two fitted, that there isnt another pair in the wing outer panels?)

    Regards

    Mark Pilkington

    in reply to: Lancaster Fuel C0ck Reqd @ BBMF #1091361
    mark_pilkington
    Participant

    Mark, hard to tell but looks like they might still be in place??

    Peter,

    I am at work now, (and only a 1 hour round trip away from the museum) but cant access my photos to examine, if I can get away this afternoon I will try and look at the c-c itself, but it would help if someone could post a markup of my photo to indicate approx location (I assume its just inboard of the engine narcelle?) I might then be able to do the “inspection” by remote control?

    Is there more than one of these cocks in place, ie one per tank, one per side?

    I do wonder if there arnt NOS one’s still lying around in Australia from the Lincoln production?

    regards

    Mark Pilkington

    in reply to: Lancaster Fuel C0ck Reqd @ BBMF #1091474
    mark_pilkington
    Participant

    .
    Actually, I forgot I have a copy of the RAF Museum’s coffee table “Lancaster Manual” it shows on fig 2 just after page 475 that it is located on the main spar outboard of the inboard engine mount, and therefore on the inboard leading edge of the wing outer panels? is that correct?

    regards

    Mark Pilkington

Viewing 15 posts - 706 through 720 (of 1,652 total)