dark light

kursed

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 409 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2361247
    kursed
    Participant

    So BVR has gone operational on the JF-17?

    http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/5508/20101116064539614876.jpg

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2363868
    kursed
    Participant

    JF-17 rehearsing for Zhuhai Air Show aerial display.

    http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/9031/27130384e189d391f7fec00.jpg
    http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/1708/2713038479f30311dcb9b72.jpg
    http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/9631/27130384e8f39553ab87a4c.jpg
    http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/2214/271303845a44d71e5602221.jpg
    http://img602.imageshack.us/img602/6779/27130384b2e4f9961c9128a.jpg
    http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/1324/271303841c5dbe000ce9a5f.jpg
    http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/2408/27130384d5f3366035ddf1e.jpg
    http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/3641/293729723b72594daaa723d.jpg
    http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/127/29372972efcb833a680d243.jpg

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2363902
    kursed
    Participant

    China rolls out the first of four Shaanxi ZDK-03 AEW&C for Pakistan.

    http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/2928/shaanxizdk03aewc.jpg

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2382958
    kursed
    Participant

    ASIA PACIFIC
    Date Posted: 23-Jul-2010

    Jane’s Defence Weekly

    Farnborough 2010: Pakistan increases autonomy in production of JF-17 Thunder aircraft

    Reuben F Johnson JDW Correspondent – Farnborough

    Two Pakistan Air Force (PAF) JF-17 Thunder aircraft were displayed at the Farnborough International Airshow, marking the first appearance by that platform at any Western airshow. The aircraft were developed and built at China’s Chengdu Aerospace Corporation (CAC) Aircraft Plant 132 in Sichuan Province under the FC-1 designator.

    The rebranding of the design as the JF-17 is intended to convey the message that the programme is a co-operative effort between CAC and the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC) in Kamra.

    However, the PAF and other senior technical personnel from the PAC have emphasised that “we are doing almost everything by ourselves now” and that where, at one time, assistance from the Chinese would have been required to integrate third-party onboard systems, “we are now able to complete this kind of work without the assistance of the Chinese”.

    PAC officials told Jane’s there has been considerable investment made in the PAC in order to support a full-spectrum capability to not only support the production of the JF-17, but also the manufacturing of its major onboard subsystems. The construction of additional facilities to support JF-17 production has resulted in the creation of four factories at the Kamra site facility that go far beyond its original capacity as just a [commercial] maintenance, repair and overhaul.

    The JF-17 programme is run by a PAF management team headed by Air Vice Marshal Mohammed Arif. Speaking to Jane’s , AVM Arif said the team of engineers and designers supporting the JF-17 have proficiency with more than just the Chinese-designed hardware that constitutes the aircraft’s configuration at present.

    The concept for the JF-17 is to use it as a basic platform that can be exported to multiple countries and to fit it with whatever set of onboard systems a customer would prefer. “We have learnt how to integrate different avionics and weapon systems on to the JF-17,” AVM Arif said. “There is still active interest in having the set of French-made hardware for the aircraft – the Thales RC400 radar and the MBDA air-to-air missiles – that have been under discussion for some time now.”

    The integration of third-party, non-Chinese equipment onto the aircraft is an option that would primarily be at the request of an export customer. The PAC programme managers are satisfied with the aircraft’s hardware and state that the JF-17’s avionics fit and glass cockpit are superior to the older-model F-16A/B Block 15 aircraft that the PAF acquired in the 1980s.

    One of the systems the PAC designers give full marks to is the CETC/NRIET KLJ-7 radar set. A PAC programme officer told Jane’s : “I have flown with this radar and with other models that we have looked at fitting to this aircraft, such as the Thales RC400, and the Chinese radar is every bit as capable as its contemporary analogues.” He added that the performance of the CETC KG300G electronic warfare pod was effective and that “there will be an upgraded version available within a year-and-a-half”.

    One of the central question marks on the programme has been the aircraft’s Russian-designed-and-built Klimov RD-93 jet engine, which is produced by the Chernyshev plant in Moscow.

    Just prior to the Farnborough Airshow, the Moscow newspaper Kommersant reported that Mikhail Pogosian, the general director for Sukhoi and RSK-MiG, had written an official letter to the Russian Federal Service for Military-Technical Co-operation (FSVTS), which regulates all exports of military-related items, and the Russian state arms export monopoly, Rosoboronexport, asking that the next tranche of 100 RD-93 engines to be shipped to CAC in Chengdu be cancelled.

    The RD-93 is a specially configured variant of the MiG-29’s RD-33, optimised for a single-engine aircraft. This version of the engine was originally conceived in the early 1990s as an option for upgrading older-model MiG-21 aircraft. A similar model of the engine, the SMR-95, was also developed in the same timeframe for use in the South African Mirage F1 and Cheetah D-2 aircraft. In both configurations, the gearbox and other components of the accessory pack are rotated from the top – where they are positioned on the standard RD-33 – to the bottom of the engine casing.

    Pogosian is reportedly requesting a halt to deliveries of the engine to CAC on the grounds that the re-export of the engine, once installed in the FC-1/JF-17, damages the interests of MiG in several markets. Negotiations for a MiG-29 purchase are supposedly ongoing in some of the same nations – Egypt, Algeria, Bangladesh and Nigeria – that have also been approached by the JF-17 sales team. For the moment, the contract for the export of these next 100 engines remains unsigned.

    AVM Arif told Jane’s that “if the Russians decide to cut off shipments of the RD-93 to us, then we still have other options. One of those is a Chinese-made WS-13 engine, which was certified by the Chinese in 2007 and has been in low-rate initial production since 2009. Pakistan industry officials confirm that it is currently undergoing flight tests on an FC-1 aircraft from CAC. Its thrust rating in the present version is almost 10 per cent higher than the RD-93 and an increased/enhanced performance engine version of up to 10 metric tonnes is in development.

    When asked about the WS-13, AVM Arif stated that “the Chinese engine needs time to mature and might not be available for five years or more”. However, one of his deputies said privately that the air vice marshal was giving the “worst case scenario and being a bit cautious”. The WS-13, they say, could be ready for use with the JF-17 as soon as two years from now.

    The JF-17 has also completed trials of dropping of unguided bombs and firings of the Luoyang Electro-Optical Technology Development Center (LOEC) Pi Li PL-5EII infrared air-to-air missile. The LOEC Shan Dian-10 (SD-10), an active radar-homing air-to-air missile, is currently undergoing integration and will be finished with its demonstration firing before the end of the year.

    “The biggest plus for the JF-17 is the cost-performance ratio, which is exceptionally good considering what you get at this price,” said AVM Arif. The long-term Pakistani plan is to have a high-low mix of fighters with the newer-model F-16C/D Block 52+ aircraft they are receiving from the US as the upper tier and the JF-17 on the lower tier.

    One of the Pakistan Air Force JF-17 Thunder combat aircraft seen at the Farnborough International Airshow. (IHS Jane’s/Patrick Allen)

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2385296
    kursed
    Participant

    Russia will continue to supply engines for the Chinese fighter

    This, as reported by Interfax , said the deputy director of Rosoboronexport, Alexander Mikheyev, noting that the performance characteristics of the Chinese aircraft are still far from the Russian. On the eve of a similar statement was made and CEO of Sukhoi and MiG Mikhail Pogosyan .

    In early July 2010 the newspaper Kommersant wrote that the Sukhoi and MiG opposed a new contract with China for engines RD-93, which are used on fighter FC-1 (JF-17) and their export options . The newspaper said the company opposed the deal with China, because the latter intends to FC-1 in Egypt. At the same market going to go MiG with the MiG-29. In April 2010 Mikheev visited Egypt, where he held talks on the possible supply of country 32 MiG-29.

    China often buy engines for its fighters in Russia, as power plants, produced in China can not provide the necessary power and have a low resource. In 2005, China bought a hundred RD-93 valued at 238 million dollars. In addition, China signed the framework agreement for the supply of 500 power plants. At the same time, China announced that it is ready to buy a thousand upgraded engines with increased thrust.

    In January 2009, China has acquired in Russia 122 AL-31FN engines for its J-10 fighter. The purchase price amounted to half a billion dollars.

    Source: http://bit.ly/aHZFgd

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2400414
    kursed
    Participant

    Since there are no ‘visible’ squadron markings, I am assuming that these are still test units.

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2400503
    kursed
    Participant

    J-10B gets an IFR probe and its pitot tube removed.

    http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/1921/2713617903d43f89de8e6d7.jpg
    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/4367/271361797f6aa16eb670a98.jpg
    http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/4376/2713617923ce9536478580f.jpg

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2404204
    kursed
    Participant

    New Delhi, Jun 28 (PTI) US defence major Lockheed Martin today said it will offer its latest fifth generation F-35 fighters to meet Indian Navy’s requirements for carrier-based combat aircraft.

    “We have received the Request for Information (RFI) from the Navy seeking information about the F-35 aircraft, which are capable of taking off from aircraft carriers. We are going to offer our aircraft to them,” Lockheed Martin Vice President Orville Prins said here.

    He said presentations had been given to the Indian Navy about both the ‘B’and ‘C’ versions of the aircraft in the recent past.

    The B version the F-35 is a short take-off and vertical landing aircraft and the C version is an aircraft carrier-based version.

    The Navy, which will acquire the under-construction Indigenous Aircraft Carrier around 2015, is likely to build another larger-size carrier and is looking to procure fighter aircraft for it.

    Source: Press Trust of India

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2407887
    kursed
    Participant

    US is sending a contingent of 50 military personnel along with 4 new F-16s in June, to ensure that sophisticated, top-of-the-line avionics, weapons and data systems aboard the aircraft remain secure – as per the signed agreements. Source: Washington Post

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #12 #2492133
    kursed
    Participant
    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #12 #2492675
    kursed
    Participant

    JF-17 didn’t feature at Zhuai 08.

    in reply to: General Discussion #323690
    kursed
    Participant

    Best wishes to Steve and hopefully you’ll be back here, real soon.

    in reply to: Re: Steve Rowell #1902630
    kursed
    Participant

    Best wishes to Steve and hopefully you’ll be back here, real soon.

    in reply to: General Discussion #351032
    kursed
    Participant

    There Will Be Blood.
    Caught a members only,free pre-release screening today at The Picturehouse in good old Greenwich.Easily the best film I’ve seen in 12 months.D D-L gives us a superb performance.It kicks No Country For Old Men out of the ballpark IMHO.

    I’ve seen this flick but couldn’t make out anything out of the ending. What did that reflect upon?

    in reply to: The Last Film You Saw…. 2!!! #1916596
    kursed
    Participant

    There Will Be Blood.
    Caught a members only,free pre-release screening today at The Picturehouse in good old Greenwich.Easily the best film I’ve seen in 12 months.D D-L gives us a superb performance.It kicks No Country For Old Men out of the ballpark IMHO.

    I’ve seen this flick but couldn’t make out anything out of the ending. What did that reflect upon?

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 409 total)