dark light

Rocky

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 390 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: blinders and fiddlers #2599080
    Rocky
    Participant

    Which big unmanouverable FIGHTER did the Russians operate in Frontal aviation?

    The MiG-21PF wasn’t big and unmanouverable, but they omitted the gun. The MiG-23S was bigger, and was unmanuverable. It was very much like the F-4 in performance.

    The real problem was that the Sparrow was crap, as were most missiles of the time.
    They weren’t mature enough to mean a fighter could fight without his sidearm backup.
    (Blind belief in technology leading to problems? Nahh, that could never happen could it?)

    Very true, but you have to admit the F-4 was not designed to turn, visability was poor, and it didn’t have a gun because it was not expected to get into a dogfight.

    in reply to: IMPRESSIVE WEAPON LOADS THREAD #2600934
    Rocky
    Participant

    Take every conventional weapon on the thread so far, add the firepower together, times that figure by tens of thousands and put it into 🙂 ONE BOMB!!!! 🙂 Hang it under a Bear and drop it in the Soviet arctic. Soviet TSAR BOMBA (King of Bombs) 50 Megatonnes Plus, exploded on 23 October 1961. IMPRESSIVE WEAPON LOAD OR WHAT! :diablo:

    It makes me wonder how far from ground zero the Bear was able to get before that bomb detonated. 😮

    in reply to: A-10 Thunderbolt/warthog #2600937
    Rocky
    Participant

    And get rid of that DU ammunition for the 30 mm. It is just a health hazard.

    I think weapons are supposed to be a health hazard. :diablo:

    in reply to: A-10 Thunderbolt/warthog #2600943
    Rocky
    Participant

    I read recently that it is going to be reengined, upgraded, and renamed the A-10C.

    in reply to: A-10 Thunderbolt/warthog #2600952
    Rocky
    Participant

    The F-16 and the F-35 are no replacements for the A-10. When your target is a tank in rolling hills and the overcast is down to the hilltops, what else is going to be able to manoeuvre with a load of weapons and go slow enough to terrain mask in a tight space and spot small targets in the vegitation? JDAM is no good on mobile targets, LGB can’t see through the muck, and nothing else has that big gun.
    The Gulf was not the place the A-10 was designed for. Flat terrain and clear skies are for fast movers. Low ceilings and hills are the domain of the A-10.

    in reply to: blinders and fiddlers #2600971
    Rocky
    Participant

    I think the MiG-25 is pretty sexy. I never cared for fighters with a nose intake.

    in reply to: How Long Before Mankind Breaks the Light Barrier #2603013
    Rocky
    Participant

    Dark matter is matter of an unknown nature that affects the rotation of galaxies. We don’t have any reason to think that it is moving unusually fast. Its called dark matter because we can’t see it and we don’t know what it is.

    in reply to: How Long Before Mankind Breaks the Light Barrier #2603224
    Rocky
    Participant

    But as everything on the ship gets heavier (ie increases in mass) then the real problem will not be accelerating, but staying alive. When our blood increases in mass and our hearts increase in mass will the latter also increase in strength to a level necessary to keep blood flowing through our bodies.

    The increase in mass is from the perspective of a stationary observer. Someone going close to the speed of light doesn’t notice anything different. We ARE going close to the speed of light from the perspective of many distant galaxies, and the electrons in your computer.

    in reply to: How Long Before Mankind Breaks the Light Barrier #2603231
    Rocky
    Participant

    Light can behave as either.

    And the particles are called photons.

    in reply to: IMPRESSIVE WEAPON LOADS THREAD #2604235
    Rocky
    Participant

    Yeah, I know they’d never go into combat like this (I wouldn’t think anyway) but still. . .

    Do you have any idea which version F-111 this is? I thought only the FB-111As had the outer pylons.

    in reply to: Are the C-5s really that worn out? #2604301
    Rocky
    Participant

    With all the use the AN-225 gets I’m surprised they don’t try to turn out a few more of those.

    How many were built?

    in reply to: IMPRESSIVE WEAPON LOADS THREAD #2604303
    Rocky
    Participant

    Small plane, bigger punch. :p

    in reply to: How Long Before Mankind Breaks the Light Barrier #2604310
    Rocky
    Participant

    It can’t happen. You can suppose there is some undiscovered law of physics that would allow it, but I doubt that very much. Nothing in the natural world travels faster than light, for one thing. (Don’t talk to me about quantum tunneling. The freaky quantum world is for subatomic particles.) I know we don’t know everything, but I think we do know something. Am I starting to sound like a Donald Rumsfeld quote??

    in reply to: IMPRESSIVE WEAPON LOADS THREAD #2604319
    Rocky
    Participant

    F-105B bomb load

    I don’t think that this bomb load was ever used in combat. There is another 500 lb bomb on each outboard wing pylon that you can’t see in the photo.

    in reply to: IMPRESSIVE WEAPON LOADS THREAD #2604322
    Rocky
    Participant

    Joke weapon loads

    Here is an RF-4C bomber!

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 390 total)