dark light

Rocky

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 390 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: IMPRESSIVE WEAPON LOADS THREAD #2604324
    Rocky
    Participant

    Joke weapon loads

    Here is an F-106A bomber!

    in reply to: Weird wings dusted off again! #2562059
    Rocky
    Participant

    It may work, but it ain’t pretty. 🙁

    in reply to: Single F/A Jet Inventory. #2562088
    Rocky
    Participant

    The F-15E. Its not the best air superiority fighter, but its very good at that and it is the best strike fighter. 😎

    in reply to: Faked apollo Mission to Moon? #2565294
    Rocky
    Participant

    I examined some thin sections of lunar rocks when I was in graduate school. I guess this makes me part of the conspiracy! 😀

    in reply to: F-14D's to replace F-111's in the interm? #2565303
    Rocky
    Participant

    It seems like the F-15E would be the logical replacement for the F-111. Its in production. A swing wing aircraft like the F-14 is, I think, ideal for long range and high speed at low level, but the F-15E ended up dropping bombs from high altitude over Iraq. If someone can come up with an excuse to start building Tomcat 21… 😀 😀 😀

    in reply to: F-14 Tomcat help please… #2576885
    Rocky
    Participant

    A naked Tomcat is all shades of grey and brownish-black and dirty yellow.

    Isn’t the yellow a primer paint?

    in reply to: Faked apollo Mission to Moon? #2577914
    Rocky
    Participant

    That makes me reconsider whether the life is really only possible with presence of oxygen and within the narrow temperature range of -30C to +50C as we know it. There is definitely a proof of Earth’s anaerobic life forms, as well of bacteria that are able to sustain temperatures exceeding +100C on long term. But whether any lifeform could go the opposite direction and live under -150 or -180C… Who knows?

    Lack of oxygen is not a problem. The Earth had no oxygen in its atmosphere for at least its first couple of billion years, and life started long before that. Lack of liquid water is a bigger problem. Life needs a liquid medium to do its chemistry in, and water freezes at 0C. There really aren’t any good substitutes for water.

    in reply to: Faked apollo Mission to Moon? #2577931
    Rocky
    Participant

    I agree it is.. But I cannot agree that it always was. There are many theories about the Moon but looks like it could have been formed by a large-scale catastrophy billions years ago, nobody has an idea of how could it have looked like before..

    The current thinking is that the Moon was formed not too long after the birth of the Solar System when a body about the size of Mars collided with the Earth. 😮 The mantle of that body and part of the Earth’s mantle splashed out into Earth orbit, and recoalesced to form the Moon. Both the Earth and the Moon are composites of the two earlier bodies. I’m sure that before that, what wasn’t molten was cratered. The early Earth was pummelled by asteroids. Since then, the Moon has just been too small to hold an atmosphere this close to the Sun.

    in reply to: Faked apollo Mission to Moon? #2584142
    Rocky
    Participant

    It would have been unthinkable even a couple of decade back for
    earthlings to even consider the possibilities that there’re these lakes, rivers, mudslides,
    Katrina force windstorms and more, which mirrors almost that of the earth and which is so similar
    and so close to home in one of Jupitors many moons. Therefore…

    Why is it so unrealistic that the next thing that science will discover,
    and prove, might not be the possibility of life forms, i.e., a Nessie of kind, in the toxic
    and inhospitable lakes, rivers, and atmosphere of this moon of Jupitor?

    No moon of Jupiter has any such conditions. They are all airless wastes. Titan, a moon of Saturn, is the only moon in the Solar system with an atmosphere. It is composed of 95% Nitrogen, and the remaining 5% is methane, cyanide and other hydrocarbons. The temperature on its surface is -178C, or -288F. Any river or body of fluid it ever had was made of liquid methane. Nessie would not be happy on Titan.

    in reply to: Faked apollo Mission to Moon? #2584145
    Rocky
    Participant

    I am curious about the details of the Apollo landing craft.. Who was the producer and what is the exact type name? Due to machine’s flawless mission record we can safely assume that the craft must have been very thoroughly tested, such successes do not happen by accident. How many test flights has the machine conducted and who were its test pilots?

    The Lunar Excursion Module was designed and built by Grumman Corp. It was tested in Earth orbit on Apollo 9 and in Lunar orbit on Apollo 10.

    in reply to: Faked apollo Mission to Moon? #2584157
    Rocky
    Participant

    .
    But, one thing I just couldn’t get out of my system is this: Why did she stop almost abruptly
    and almost instaniously when it’s finally becoming a routine for her???

    We went to the Moon to beat the Soviets there. Its damned expensive to go to the Moon, and we had achieved our objective.

    Suspicions: Could future paleontologists to the moon surprise us
    all with finds of the existence of prehistoric life forms on the lunar surface
    known as homo sapiens???

    No. There is no atmosphere on the Moon. Its a lifeless little ball of rock and it always has been.

    in reply to: Faked apollo Mission to Moon? #2586234
    Rocky
    Participant

    1. If alien and UFO have landed on earth, they surely will visit us frequently, might walk at Time Square, taking pictures, etc…

    To get here at all would be horrendusly difficult and expensive. Its not like a drive into town.

    2. It takes a huge rocket to lifted off from earth. How the puny capsule can lifted off from the moon. and the capsule’s rocket motor seems incorrect.

    The payload mass is much smaller, and the Moon’s gravity is 1/6 Earth’s.

    Rocky
    Participant

    I think a SAM could take it out. Thats one reason they didn’t replace the B-52 with something like the B-70, but went low with the B-1 instead. Anything that big and that high is going to be seen coming from a long way away.

    in reply to: New Strategic Bomber for the U.S. Air Force #2593085
    Rocky
    Participant

    unmanned strategic bomber?

    Am I the only one that doesn’t like this idea at all?

    Anything big and expensive enough to be “strategic” ought to have a man in it to react to enemy defenses, or land the thing when some electric gizmo breaks. In my mind, unmanned = expendable.

    in reply to: Last ever F14 catapult launch? #2593111
    Rocky
    Participant

    F-14 for sure is a real beauty. WHile the F-4 is a different kind of beauty F-14 is different. It’s shape is so beautiful.

    They should atleasst keep some of them flying. Just in case they find something seriously wrong with Superbug

    You mean, other than being slow, short ranged, and lacking Phoenix or a powerful radar?

    I love the Tomcat, but I wouldn’t feel so bad about its retirement if it was being replaced by something better. 🙁

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 390 total)