dark light

longshot

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 1,591 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • longshot
    Participant

    The Dewoitine D.338 is a favourite of mine https://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/8662773609

    in reply to: French flying boat Lioré et Olivier H-242 #769742
    longshot
    Participant

    I didn’t realize the Leo 242s had red wingsperiod photo port side

    in reply to: Northrop Gamma 2L G-AFBT #770616
    longshot
    Participant
    in reply to: Comet XK655 arrival Strathallan 1974 #786971
    longshot
    Participant

    Landing on grass and the starboard right leg dug in??

    in reply to: BOAC Liberator II Landing At Prestwick #790558
    longshot
    Participant

    I would guess that the Liberator which ‘saw off’ the Condors was flown by Terry Bulloch?

    in reply to: LGW movements record #790733
    longshot
    Participant

    Air Pictorial logged first-time aircraft visitors at Gatwick from 1958, I believe.  There are records from about 1970  at http://www.lhr-lgw.co.uk/   I believe there are some Gatwick records at the Surrey History Centre  (Guildford?)

    in reply to: Checking out old topic on London Airport #791057
    longshot
    Participant

    I’m not sure which runway and direction the Lancastrian is using but I think the tower-like cluster on the left is the concrete mixing plant  , as for the shed on the left again not sure…possibly the old Fairey building?

    in reply to: Checking out old topic on London Airport #791441
    longshot
    Participant

    It wasn’t the waving, more that the PIA flight is taxying Westwards (away from the terminal/parking area)

    in reply to: Farman floatplanes (hydravions) #791461
    longshot
    Participant

    Thanks, Mothminor……I think you were on the right trail from the start :-)…doubt if we’ll ever find a clearer photo of the ‘raid’ configuration,though.

    in reply to: Checking out old topic on London Airport #791465
    longshot
    Participant

    Your PIA Super Constellation ids departing, Laurence. Here’s a 1954/1955ish view from the passenger friends enclosure entrance  (BEA operating off the closed runway 28R)LAP North 1957ish

    in reply to: Farman floatplanes (hydravions) #791610
    longshot
    Participant

    I think avions anciens’ translation of the Liron book nails it…the description matches what we see in the back of the hangar. In the comparison double photo I posted  I had flipped the hangar photo L-R to make comparison of the struts easier…it was then I noticed that the 2-blade propeller of the ‘raid’ Jabiru turned the opposite way to the 4-blade job on the windowed passenger F-AIGE.

    in reply to: Farman floatplanes (hydravions) #791646
    longshot
    Participant

    Deletion of windows was common on long distance special versions (e.g. the Atlantic Empire boats, Howard Hughes DC-1 and Lockheed 14). Note also that the single prop on the Jabiru in the hangar turns the opposite way to the ‘4-blade’ arrangement on F-AIGE…could be explained by a change of engine type.  At least the unique? strut and wire bracing on F-AIGE bears some relation to those on the Jabiru in the hangar.There are contemporary French Aviation magazines archived online which might help but my French is too poor to search effectively

    in reply to: Farman floatplanes (hydravions) #791911
    longshot
    Participant

    Yes , I was comparing the photo of F-AIGE with the hangar shot, too. The struts on F-AIGE are different from all the other F.170 Jabirus on that useful Russian site, and are closer to the pattern of the hangar example as are the crossed bracing wires (absent on the other F.170s).   http://www.airwar.ru/image/idop/cw1/f170/  

    In the attached join-up image I’ve reversed the hangar picture for easier comparison (thus it’s prop goes the wrong way 🙂 )

    in reply to: Farman floatplanes (hydravions) #791936
    longshot
    Participant

    Mothminor….I do believe you’ve got it!! The F.171 seems to have been the single engine Farman Jabiru (which looked a bit more ‘normal’ than the 2- and particularly the 3- engine version).  Now the search is on for a clearer photo of this floatplane version.

    in reply to: Spotters, who are they? #791950
    longshot
    Participant

    FAO L Garey et al….This is what John WR Taylor said on ‘Military Registrations’  in the back of the 1954 Civil Aircraft Markings………

    .” Finally, a word of warning…Collections of military serial numbers…except for those listed in the next three pages*…could be of immense value to enemies of this country, as they give a clue to the number of each type that we have in service, where they are based and so on. For that reason we ask our readers to be careful. Collections of civil markings can hurt nobody, current military markings might. So remember that the safety of our country is more important than merely satisfying your collector’s urge!  *There was a supplement including prototype/development military serials and temporary ‘trooping’ serials

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 1,591 total)