dark light

longshot

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 1,591 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 1950's Archive Part 1: Hendon 1951 #1095670
    longshot
    Participant

    Thank you for posting these…am I correct, they are samples from your larger flickr collection? for example
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dwhitworth/5476808989/in/set-72157626046124174/

    in reply to: C118F #1096696
    longshot
    Participant

    If you go through the Fairchild ads(often for sale on eBay) for the period you find that the name Packet was still used by Fairchild for the P&W powered early C-119s (often with ‘Flying Boxcar’ as an attribute)…Flying Boxcar and later just Boxcar was used for the Wright R-3350 powered C-119F and G models

    The C-82 was officially named the Packet, but earned the nickname “Flying Boxcar” because of its shape, size, and purpose. The nickname became official with the C-119:

    http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=791

    http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=790

    in reply to: Monarch Hed kandi #495669
    longshot
    Participant

    Hed Kandi….A triumph for the ‘Initial Teaching Alphabet’ I guess 🙂

    in reply to: C118F #1097037
    longshot
    Participant

    The original Fairchild Packet was the C-82, the later more powerful and modified C-119 initially used the name Packet but later became known as the Flying Boxcar with the USAF although the US Marines, thev Indian AF and various European AF operators continued to call it the Packet as did the British (spotters and the press). Whatever it was I bet it was noisy and vibrating.

    in reply to: Monarch Hed kandi #495738
    longshot
    Participant
    in reply to: Great Scoops From Flickr And LIFE Archive #1108412
    longshot
    Participant

    More flickr

    Nice one, pagen01….I particularly like the photos of the departure of King George of Greece on a Lancastrian on Heathrow North in Stephen Greensted’s set

    dehavillandflyer’s photos on flickr feature De Havillands fast and slow but also a rare set of aircraft in the Congo 1961…for example
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/9190123@N03/page4/

    and the Gulbenkian Foundation in Lisbon have a few of Portela Airport ca.1943…a sample http://www.flickr.com/photos/biblarte/4647575772/

    in reply to: Boeing model archive #1110610
    longshot
    Participant

    There was a swift glimpse of a 707 type with a seriously coke-bottle type area-ruled fuselage

    in reply to: Visits at Portuguese aviation musea #524321
    longshot
    Participant

    Thanks, Padidiver…nice work…looks like a Harpoon and Ju-52 at the Alverca graveyard

    in reply to: Gulfstreams Topic #501197
    longshot
    Participant

    The Wikipedia page on the Gulfstream I describes a G.IC with a 3.2m stretch 5 conversions by Gulfstream ….are you thinking of the Canadian stretch to the CV-580?

    Very nice image Neil. I can’t bear the thought of a Gulfstream being parted out:(

    Have any of you king people got a pic of the stretched derivative of the G1? I believe it was a Canadian company that converted existing airframes. I’m not aware of who operated the relatively small number completed. I could of course, be imagining the whole thing!:)

    in reply to: Liberator 'Ticket home' #1129155
    longshot
    Participant

    ‘Ticket Home’ crashlanding Heston WWII

    Broadening this a bit does anybody know of U.S.A.A.C WWII aircraft with this name….there was a P-47 or P-51 with the name apparently, but the letter mentions a Liberator

    in reply to: Is Concorde really a "British" design? (2009 thread) #1131463
    longshot
    Participant

    I suspect the internal ticket prices on all Aeroflot flights before the Soviet Union broke up were somewhat artificial.

    in reply to: Is Concorde really a "British" design? (2009 thread) #1131622
    longshot
    Participant

    SSTs in ‘Classless Societies’

    Ditto for Concorde in Britain and France!! 🙂

    in reply to: BOAC Mosquito G-AGGF #1131630
    longshot
    Participant

    LIFE archive photo of BOAC Mossie on
    http://tinyurl.com/5rbnxt9
    and a few BOAC Mossie related pics in Stephen Greensted’s flickr album
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/7691137@N06/page7/

    in reply to: DC-4 or DC-6? #504569
    longshot
    Participant

    The fact that its got prop spinners rules out the Canadair C-5 so it looks like a radar nose DC-6, probably an A, B or C.The US Military procurement was 101 C-118A for the USAF, 65 R6D for the US Navy (redesignated C-118B in 1962) plus the single XC-112 (DC-6 prototype) and the C-118DO President truman’s ‘Independence’

    in reply to: DC-4 or DC-6? #505298
    longshot
    Participant

    Perhaps its a Canadair C-5 🙂

    Greetings All,

    It’s been quite some time since I posted here, but I figure this is the best place to start to answer a question I’ve got regarding the Douglas DC-4 & DC-6 airliners.

    In short, how do you tell the difference between the two? What are some easy things to pick out between them that could help ID the type…specifically from a head-on perspective.

    Background: I received a series of four painted wood pallets about 24×24 (inches) in size as a gift, and when hung up on the wall in the right order they display a picture of a vintage airliner from a head-on perspective. It’s really something quite neat to have in the living room, and I love how it looks. I’m just bothered because I can’t quite ID what type of aircraft it is.

    My guess is that it is either a DC-4 or a DC-6, but I can’t tell which.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 1,591 total)