Well the aircraft is registered with the CAA. π
Mark
I remember a few years ago someone registered a cast-iron manhole cover with the CAA.
That project also needed unusual ammounts of optomism to take to the skies.
Suggest you take a look at PPRuNe website. Have a roam around there (especially the Wannabe’s forums)and you will find much useful info. It is a huge resource, and many very well-informed people contibute. They are plenty of plonkers as well, but that’s the internet for you!
Best wishes
A few months ago, a ‘marketing survey’ caught me at a most inconvenient time.
His sales pitch opened with the very personal question ”Are you a Homo, Nuh? ”
Things went downhill very fast, and no double glazing changed hands. It took a while before I realised that he was trying to speak to the ‘home-owner’!
A few months ago, a ‘marketing survey’ caught me at a most inconvenient time.
His sales pitch opened with the very personal question ”Are you a Homo, Nuh? ”
Things went downhill very fast, and no double glazing changed hands. It took a while before I realised that he was trying to speak to the ‘home-owner’!
Keep it as a live airframe like the Lightnings, doing fast nose-high runs, and chute deployments, and stick a bunch of airline seats in the bomb bay, to do passenger taxi runs, with a video screen to make up for the lack on windows!
If that is not attractive to the powers-that-be, then it may have to end with an unfortunate ‘accident’ and a big insurance claim :diablo:
Going from memory, I think the maximimum number of members permitted by the CAA in a syndicate is twenty.
So, a share is Β£575, valuing the aeroplane at Β£11,500. Somehow, it doesn’t quite add up.
”Re-arrange the following words to form a well-known phrase or saying”
Bargepole-a-touch-with-I-it-wouldn’t.
That’s a very unusual picture, I suppose because most Spits don’t go IMC, and if they did, we wouldn’t see them! Also I am not sure how common it is to fly formation in cloud. If it were 2 or more single seaters in formation that close, it is not likely anyone could spare the attention to start waving a camera around.
Maybe it is a video still, hence the stopped prop.
The Invader did not ‘stall’ , though it may have been near a high speed stall on impact. That was not the cause of impact.
Lessons HAVE been learnt. What bomber aerobatics have you seen on the last 20 years? Don’t count AD-4’s.
The Blenheim will be exposed to a degree of risk, as is the case with any flying aeroplane, but you may be certain it will be operated with the utmost care.
It was inevitabable that the tone of this thread would take a negative turn. π
Photographing aeroplanes, in one sense, has never been easier, and with a Β£400 digital SLR and a Β£400 lens, you are well set up to get punchy, ‘fill the frame’ detailed air-to ground images. With a bit of practice most people can do it.
When the season starts, we will again see threads galore from Old Warden of the old favourites banking round the crowdline, which is all well and good, but creatively, that particular lemon has been squeezed pretty dry
The old rules still apply ie compostion, effects of light, appropriate shutter speed/focal length,such that the photographer is involved in a creative process, rather than just recording what he sees. If the subject is newsworthy, that is even better, but also, what is commonplace now, will eventually have great nostalgic interest.
Sometimes, one can find that one wants/needs to be in a location which is not neccessarily officially sanctioned. That is a matter for personal judgement and the less said the better, but it would be disingenuous to pretend that it does not make a difference.
Hello all,
Forgive me if this questioned has been answered numerous times, but how come we never see this Fury on the airshow circuit? With TFC aquiring a small fleet of Sea Furys recently, any chance of it popping down to DX?
Having spoken to JB at Kemble, where it lived for a while, it seemed to me that he had some strong opinions and issues regarding airshows, remuneration and participation, which made public displays improbable.
If there is a glut of the type at Dx, that would make an appearance from JB even less likely.
He seemed most preoccupied with the expenses involved with the Fury operation, which is not surprising! I think his pension was funding it all.
‘For the benefit of the uneducated, I will translate’
Here some further information. Please excuse my English is no more the best.
The two brothers who are the owners startet with a company for regular metal mechanics. Then they get infected by the 109-virus. And then they specialize on the 109. The first parts developed in the year 2000. They have a lot of cnc-mschines and what is much more important, they have the original drawings of the 109. So they were able to digitalize the parts, put them in a CAD-System and rebuild every part of the 109. The parts have an extemly high quality.
Help vor other 109-projects is mandatorily. After the landing-accident of the βred 7β they helped with spare parts and with a mounting jig. They also produce spare parts fort the 109s of the Messerschmidt-foundation. After the landing-accident of the G-10 (Black 2), they have the wings and other parts for repair. After the second emergancy-landing of the βred 7β they bulid spare parts, for example the sheets fort he oil-coolant-radiator.
The first series will be 7 aircraft.
The question is always the engine. For shure, one or two of the aircraft will get an original 605 engine.
Thanks to CC(WIX)
Short finals 26 ………………
Though of only tender years, you clearly had a good, instinctive feel for composition.
Go get that digital SLR, and see if the old magic is still there.;)
Sounds uneconomic to me.
”Hi All, just thought i would inform you all that the project luscombe i was working on and completed at the end of last year sadly came to an end on christmas eve, after flying a grand total of 3hrs 45mins since permit issue. At the end of ground roll, flipped onto roof, complete constructors loss. gonna cost at least 20k to repair including labour.
Shame as i enjoyed flying it for all of 1.5hrs and was looking forward to arriving at one of the meets.
If i knew how to post photos on here i would, appologies.
If anyone wants photos pm and i can email if you want to upload them onto here for me.
Pilot was ok, bump to head and broken rib, wasnt me.
Paul
_________________
Restoring G-AKTN Luscombe 8A”
FROM European Luscombes forum.
Just to bring this one to a close, I think the picture says it all.
The aeroplane had very recently been restored, was 3 hours after ‘first flight’, and now a write off π
I won’t bother guessing again…