dark light

Propstrike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,551 through 2,565 (of 3,488 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfire markings #1301161
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    Is that MR as in aviation artist and one-time Jaguar operator ?

    If so, I had the pleasure of flogging you a half-page advertising space in Wingspan mag about 15 years ago. Very good value it was, too.

    This IS the place to come for expert advice!

    in reply to: Best Preserved Airfield? #1301650
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Maybe we could include 8th Air Force bases in East Anglia, as it would be interesting to know which of those is the most complete. ‘Airfields of the Eighth’ ( book) is now 30 years old, and what looked intact in 1978 may well be obliterated now.

    I believe some of the land owners have made efforts to conserve the sites.

    in reply to: Bader auction #1302958
    Propstrike
    Participant

    CJH.- Come now, have you no vision?

    The warbird restorers can do wonders these days ! Whole Spitfires have arisen from no more than a single rivet ( and that had to be replaced cos it was magnesium)

    in reply to: Bader auction #1303089
    Propstrike
    Participant

    One of the lots is the remains of a Bristol Bulldog ( a possible candidate for an airworthy restoration?)

    The auction house state that there was a Bulldog crash at Kenley on 14/12/31. Seeing as it is probably the single most significant date in the Bader biography, you might imagine that they would know he actually crashed at Woodley.

    In itself, this is just another error, but sloppy attention to detail perpetuates more errors, which over time become new ‘facts’, if left unchecked.

    in reply to: Garden Use of Aircraft relics #1304716
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Who left the landing light on?

    in reply to: Garden Use of Aircraft relics #1304887
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Going by the design of the lamp standards, I would say that photo was taken in Redbourn.

    in reply to: The Bader Enigma (The End) #1305834
    Propstrike
    Participant

    This thread should have a warning at the top;-

    MAY CONTAIN NUTS.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: What magazines are you all reading? #433863
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I too read the occassional FlyPast, though I now consider Key publishing’s premier service is the provision of this forum. As a PFA/LAA member I get the mag every month.

    Pilot has lost its ‘soul’ since JG let it go, and is no longer funny/bitchy/ controversial or very interesting any more. I think i have read too many flight tests in my time, and now find most of them pretty dull. However, there are a few really worthwhile authors around, and anything by Brian Lecomber is worth reading.

    For news, gossip, info, everything is online a month before it hits the news stands. Having once avidly consumed 4/5 titles a month, I now get just one by default, and on the others can save £4 (10 minutes fuel in a Cub!) , dont have to find the time to read it, and don’t have to make space to store it.

    I feel the sun is setting on magazines of this kind, and doubt they can remain profitable in the longer term, especially if the GA ‘industry’ contracts in line with present trends and declining numbers of PPL holders.

    The internet is a huge free-for-all, but unfortunately it is the ‘free’ aspect which may spell an end to the availability of contemporary aviation based articles. Though the mags do not pay writers very well, most contributors to the internet get nothing at all, which is not much incentive to knock out two thousand well-crafted words.

    Having said all that, the mags have never looked better, and all the colour printing, good paper and decent design makes for an attractive product if you are in the mood.

    in reply to: RAF Airfields on Film #1312209
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Chalgrove (Oxon) was used in the Professionals on two occasions-
    Lots of Capris and tyre-squealing (of course!)

    in reply to: Air Transport Aux. pilots list #1326249
    Propstrike
    Participant

    ‘He’ was a she, ie Monique Agazatian, who later operated an outfit flying Rapides at Heathrow in the 50’s, before the whole place got too big and busy.

    She then ran a flight simulator business at Booker for many years, retiring in the mid 80’s or thereabouts. I think she is no longer with us.

    in reply to: More early 1950s Box Brownie pix #1328426
    Propstrike
    Participant

    That funny looking ‘Tiger’ is an Avro 638 Club Cadet which was seen at WW in July 52 at a vintage rally.

    in reply to: WW1 Reps at Thorpe Park #1241892
    Propstrike
    Participant

    We did this a year or two ago, so should all be in the archives.

    In short they are dispersed,- some crashed , like the parasol Fokker, the S5 replica, the D7 (I think), Robin Bowes Triplane but the Camel is at Yeovilton, another Middle Wallop. That is all I can remember OTTOMH.

    in reply to: Lee Howard – Please Clear Your PMs, Tks #1243873
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Opinion has been very one-sided so far.

    I think he should preserve his messages for future generations to enjoy.
    Some of them are probably unique, but the others should be publically displayed, if conditions are suitable.

    in reply to: History of L-4 H "479748" wanted #1245459
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Greetings from a fellow Cub driver!

    Interesting rear glazing you have there, not quite J3 but not L4 either. Some local mod I imagine.

    in reply to: Accident Report Published on Duxford-based T-33 #1245845
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Resmoroh,

    Despite the benefits derived fron your Degree Course, your ‘arguement’ is full of inconsistencies.

    You state the need to preserve these aviation relics, yet promote the idea of flying Beverlys, of which there is, as you no doubt know, just a single survivor.

    Yet you remain troubled by the continued operation of Spits, of which there are maybe fifty airworthy at present. Many of these later restorations are pretty close to your notion of reproductions anyway, and indeed some have been produced with no pretence to being original airframes.

    If you apply some sort of cost-benefit analysis, I would argue that the money and jobs and pure enjoyment that warbird operations bring to so many of us, is vastly more significant than the arcane study of some future generations. Given the vast number of airframes and relics in existence, they will not be short of raw material.

    You ask what the ‘future generations will do’ when they find out that some aeroplanes were lost in recreational flying. There IS a chance that they might riot, or trample on our graves. Then again, they might not give a stuff.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,551 through 2,565 (of 3,488 total)