dark light

Propstrike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,001 through 3,015 (of 3,488 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: VAC Valentine Rally #408351
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Oh dear.. ANOTHER VAC event wiped out by the weather.

    Curses, I was all lined up to fly up in a Jungmann, everything arranged, and then I peek outside the window at 0730, and the cloud is on the deck, rain pitching down, and suddenly it goes from a day of vintage aviating, to a day of rubbing down the woodwork in the front room. BLAST!!

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1389187
    Propstrike
    Participant

    ‘Undercarriage lever a bit sticky, was it?’

    ‘Er, well yes, as a matter of fact it was’

    ‘Well, I wouldn’t got telling that to the CO, if I was you’

    All from memory- I am sure Daz is word perfect!

    in reply to: Devon crash landing today #1389329
    Propstrike
    Participant

    ‘The pilot did a bloody good job’ (?) – I suppose for a passenger in mortal fear, who subsequently steps out of an aeroplane unscathed, that is a fair comment

    The poor Devon looks quite ‘smiley’ in its bubble bath!

    in reply to: Fairchild Argus/Sibson today #1389335
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I think I like the hangar best! A real ratty old WW11 vintage T2 (?), which echos to the sound of merlins and where exotic aeroplanes lurk in the darkest recesses.

    There were four like that at Booker, but then the modernisers started modernising, and now there are three ghastly blue sheds,- looks more like an industrial estate.

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1390320
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I remember Spitfire G-AIDN also landing gear-up, also at Coventry in 1978.
    ML407 ended up on its belly at Southampton in 1986.
    PT426 was alleged to have landed gear-up whilst owned by Charles Church in a rather ‘hushed-up’ incident.

    It would be an obvious conclusion to suppose that a ‘trainer’ is more likely to suffer landing mishaps, but in reality that does not seem to be a common factor.

    They all returned to the air in due course.

    in reply to: Well there I was on the M25 this lunchtime… #1391971
    Propstrike
    Participant

    OK, so Maxalpha (denizen of Bicester) has today viewed the Seafire at an airfield in all liklihood not too far away (say in Bucks/Northants) which might just have a reputation for top-quality spraying.

    Is this all really supposed to be secret???? And why???????????
    Still, more fun than Sudoko, I suppose!

    in reply to: Robinson 88 prototype #408529
    Propstrike
    Participant

    DB, you are quite correct. As I understand it, the ‘ATO’ issues (always tipping over)
    could not be overcome on the monoskid varient, hence the development of the wheeled prototype.

    in reply to: Bedsheet Bomber on the move! #1395501
    Propstrike
    Participant

    The static display airframes at Booker have all seemed a bit short of TLC- hopefully the B-25 will fare better.

    It would be more relevant at Dunsfold, where 98 Squadron flew them.

    in reply to: Harvard OY-IIB crash (June 2005) #1395509
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I read half those posts before seeing that it happened last year. Thank God it is not a ‘new’ accident, though no doubt the families are still very much affected.

    We can only hope that the conclusions of the report will be read and understood by others.

    in reply to: New Home Wanted For Mossie Replica #1398220
    Propstrike
    Participant

    For any museum that would be a great exhibit. It has the ‘presence’ of a Mosquito, a charismatic shape that would appeal to the general public, most of whom would not know, or be much troubled by the fact that it is a reproduction.

    For better or for worse, I suspect that they would probably rather see that than a perfectly restored Vampire, for instance, which though worthy, is not quite so glamorous.

    in reply to: Robinson 88 prototype #408585
    Propstrike
    Participant

    There is a ‘hot’ version as well, seemingly.

    in reply to: Chipmunks #1401730
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Ad..I mean Albert. Are those pictures trannies??- just something about the colour density and richness. Shot through perspex, I imagine.

    in reply to: I learned about test flying on that one #408685
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Strewth!! After a spin like that, and the poor control response, I don’t think I would have done any more.

    I hope your ‘Bleriot Experimental’ will be better behaved!

    in reply to: Chipmunks #1401951
    Propstrike
    Participant

    So if you are looking at the camera ship, and he was looking at you (assuming he wasn’t leading the formation from behind!) who was looking out ahead?? :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Bf-108 Taifun – Nord 1000-1002 #1403856
    Propstrike
    Participant

    You may be in luck. ‘Taifun’ posts on here pretty regularly. You could find him with the search function, and send him a P.M.

    He operates a Nord. Also I think ARC at Duxford are rebuilding another one.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,001 through 3,015 (of 3,488 total)