dark light

Propstrike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 3,488 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Restoration of Spitfire NH341 #786852
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Would we, as enthusiasts and supporters of historic aviation, be better off if the practice of ‘resurrected identity’ airframes ceased ?

    The answer is surely no, and on that basis, we should at least endorse, if not actively encourage those who make it happen. It is not as though any deception is practiced by any party, and as the years roll by, it is obvious that ‘new metal’ ( or wood) will increasingly be at the heart of any flying project.

    From a personal perspective, and even as a devotee of Spitfires, each of these new flyers are, by increment, a little bit less ‘significant’ as numbers swell. Today, we gain another flying Spit, but seemingly lose an airworthy Meteor ( a hugely significant and rare type) , and whilst the Spit may be 10 times the ££value of a Meteor, sadly on this day, I think we are rather worse off.

    in reply to: Shoreham Investigation Update #789003
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I would have thought that any current vintage jet operator would do better to keep their opinions to themselves at this juncture, and concentrate instead on making sure that their own aircraft can now meet the new safety requirements, rather than making comments online that are already stirring up further unhelpful speculation etc on forums.

    In defence of J W, he pretty much HAS kept his council, though he, of all people, would have a valid and accurate perspective on displaying Hunters, had he infact chosen to ‘go public’ on the whole issue.

    Far from being provocative, he was simply trying to put a lid on the generally ignorant and repetitive ‘chatter’ which had overtaken the Miss Demeanour facebook page.

    in reply to: Aerospace Bristol merged with Bristol Freighter for UK #790107
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Good timing, I’ve just re-read that novel. It did keep me wondering though, which other types could have been the basis for the Airtruck and Carrier?

    Take a look at this thread, when we pondered these very questions!

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?50965-Round-The-Bend-What-was-Nevil-Shute-thinking-of

    in reply to: Shoreham Investigation Update #791549
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Maybe now the grounding of the civilian Hunters can finally be rescinded.

    The near instant CAA response ( 72 hours) was in the understandable ‘ must be seen to be doing something’ category’ but at the conclusion of a huge and searching investigation, the aeroplane, as a type seems to be essentially blameless.

    The bigger question is how many civilian operators still have enthusiasm to set out on the road back to airworthiness.

    in reply to: Seeking Airworthy Douglas Skyraider Images Past And Present #792771
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Never seen photos of the near mid-air before. That was WAY too close for comfort.

    Hard to judge the distance, but the Skyraider has an on-crowd vector at that point.

    in reply to: C-54 North Weald #793367
    Propstrike
    Participant

    but I thought it had already been cut !

    One chopped up and gone, one still remains.

    in reply to: Seeking Airworthy Douglas Skyraider Images Past And Present #793496
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Excuse my curiosity Lazy8, just wondering if the colours could be lifted a bit.

    in reply to: C-54 North Weald #793509
    Propstrike
    Participant

    It was inspected last week by a party looking into the practicalities of a return to airworthiness.

    in reply to: Seeking Airworthy Douglas Skyraider Images Past And Present #793662
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Legends 2011

    in reply to: Seeking Airworthy Douglas Skyraider Images Past And Present #793684
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Afternoon Forum

    Obviously full credit will be given to those that provide the images.

    FB

    On the various occasions when I have contributed images for publication a ££ Fee ( pretty modest I must say ) has been forthcoming.

    I know there is not much dough to be made in aviation publishing these days, but is this an enthusiast publication, or a commercial venture ?

    in reply to: Flying Legends 2017 #794649
    Propstrike
    Participant

    “People confuse this (Flying Legends) with a Warbird show. It’s not. It’s a piston-era show”. I guess I can’t argue with the guy who set it all up!

    No doubt it will be well worth attending, and by tradition, the ‘headline attractions’ tended to be added in the final few weeks,

    in reply to: Flying Legends 2017 #794782
    Propstrike
    Participant

    As a 20 year legends supporter, I applaud the organisation and commitment that makes it happen, but Flying Legends is essentially a warbird show ( or was) , and it was not so long ago that even two-seat Spits were seen as a bit ‘iffy’ for the line up.

    Golden era racing classics have a natural arena 18 miles way at Old Warden, and their inclusion does rather dilute the theme that has made Legends a must-see international event.

    I hope that plenty of warbirds based on the continent can be encouraged to attend, and that the event is not limited to just the much-loved but familiar home grown attractions. I have no doubt that those who make it all happen are pulling every string they can.

    in reply to: North Weald Diary (2017) #795245
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Nanchang. Rear canopy goes back nicely.

    in reply to: North Weald Diary (2017) #795269
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I’m probably on my own here (as I usually am on this Spitfire obsessed forum) but this is a beauty!

    Rob

    Took this a few years ago,

    Propstrike
    Participant

    A very interesting question.

    Maybe our active flyers will soon extend to just a few years post war.

    I think the UK historic jet scene is being shut down by stealth by the CAA, who will claim they were only trying to ‘make it safe’ but either deliberately, or with indifference, imposed such onerous standards and endless costs, that most operators would be utterly discouraged. If you strangle the shows in red tape as well, then you cut off the income stream to support operation of historic aircraft.

    Mechanical complexity and withholding of industry support makes it most unlikely 70’s and 80’s era front line aircraft could be operated by anyone other than government or industry Big aeroplane=big problems, as the Vulcan demonstrated.

    Perhaps Shuttleworth will one day get a S.A Bulldog. I would not anticipate activity at much beyond that kind of level, sadly.

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 3,488 total)