dark light

Propstrike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 826 through 840 (of 3,488 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Heads Up – "Red Tails" – Sunday 22/3/15 #869935
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I am curious which shots in Always were models.

    I suppose the Invader flying through the flames, and blowing up , but what else ? Probably the Invader dumping on the PBY.

    in reply to: Heads Up – "Red Tails" – Sunday 22/3/15 #869941
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Models per se are not necessarily verboten, and they have worked well in plenty of films such as Memphis Belle. I concede they were AWFUL in 633 Squadron, but that was half a century ago !

    Models, and even ( intelligent ) CGI have their place in contemporary film making, as long as the trajectories which they follow are broadly within the limits of aerodynamics of the era in question, ie no Mustangs performing multiple rolls in a 10,000 feet vertical climb 🙂

    in reply to: Heads Up – "Red Tails" – Sunday 22/3/15 #872442
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Some good points are made in defence of Red Tails, and of course, it is quite true we are far from the audience GL said he was trying to reach.

    As aviation enthusiasts, though, naturally we look particularly at flying sequences, and it has to be said they were not very memorable, which was a shame since they had a number of real aircraft on the set, and there was an opportunity to do something more striking.

    Probably the grumpy tone is a broader regret that the film industry has not produced a big budget flying film for decades ( no doubt they have their reasons ) , and recent productions like Red Tails and FlyBoys have felt lightweight and ersatz

    For myself, Magnificent Men set the bar, and that was made back in 1965 🙂

    Propstrike
    Participant

    Oddly enough, this is good to hear.

    Once ‘captured’, and carted away to crumble to oblivion, the spell would be broken and finished.

    But for now, it is still out there, mysterious and intriguing, just out of reach..

    Propstrike
    Participant

    What a shame, a cliche to say it, but really the end of an era.

    Nobody produces a journal like this for a profit, and 30 years (or so ) is a damned fine run.

    The number of active piston aircraft is dwindling of course, so I suppose every endeavour has a natural ending.

    Thanks to all the team, and a good time to remember Stephen Piercey.

    ” By this time he had launched as a spare-time hobby Propliner, a quarterly journal devoted to the world’s surviving propeller airliners and their past glories. He edited it in his bedroom among his Argonaut souvenirs and a collection of slides which, by the time of his death, had risen to 25,000. We hope that this collection, a unique record of piston-transport’s twilight, will find a good home. And perhaps one of Steve’s countless friends throughout the world might name a propliner after him.

    http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1984/1984%20-%200984.html

    in reply to: Heads Up – "Red Tails" – Sunday 22/3/15 #875593
    Propstrike
    Participant

    120 minute long computer game, with every possible clunky, lumbering, cliche putting in an inept appearance.

    Before long one cannot help but hope that ( in the style of 633 Squadron ) the whole squadron is wiped out.

    And quickly.

    in reply to: Chuck Yeager thread (Updated) #875595
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I was lucky enough to meet Jim Lovell last year (Apollo 13 Flight Commander ) and he was a fascinating and generous fellow to spend a couple of hours with.

    Oddly enough, he, the real hero could walk down Piccadilly unrecognised whilst Tom Hanks ( screen portrayal ) would be mobbed !

    With anyone very famous, I think there is a public persona/story which they present, and it is very hard to get underneath that, and maybe it is intrusive to even try.

    in reply to: heads up – BBC4 9.00pm 17/3/15 #877308
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Isn’t that the point!!

    Shame the prog didn’t make more of the team effort rather than trying to make out she was flying alone through Africa.

    That’s the funny thing about ‘reality’ television- the reality is the first thing to stripped out in the final edit.

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go (2015) #878626
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Spitfire (MH434?) low in the Biggin Valley, the same spot where the Invader came to grief.

    There are Invader images in this link but they are graphic and not in the spirit of this thread.

    http://www.panoramio.com/photo_explorer#view=photo&position=50&with_photo_id=50604149&order=date_desc&user=232613

    in reply to: Seafire FR47 VP 441 #878682
    Propstrike
    Participant

    It turned up at Booker sometime in the ’70’s.

    Photo from this illuminating thread.

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?23796-Seafire-VP441/page3

    in reply to: Seafire FR47 VP 441 #879180
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Also with Reflectaire at Squires Gate was Mew Gull GAEXF and that has been restored, the Sabre ( GATBF) was scrapped eventually. A few Hurricane frames from a local scrapyard were also likely scrapped.

    We (the forum) mulled over this at length and concluded the Sabre went back Stateside and was incorporated into the drone project.

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?37743-Blackpool-F86-(xb733)-on-Lancashire-farm-any-leads

    in reply to: Spitfire target tug video link #880557
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Good find !

    Quality of air-air filming is not the greatest, but never mind.

    in reply to: Bristol Freighter Vs Carvair #882299
    Propstrike
    Participant

    The Enstone example no longer exists in any meaningful sense.

    This photo of remnants was 10 years ago.

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/duke_of_milan/5848013833/in/photostream/

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #882308
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Has anybody ever tried to make a more streamlined lower cowling panel for the Buchon?. The usual ones make the nose profile very ugly indeed!.

    This is neater, but I am not certain it is a Merlin engine. There is currently one being fitted with an Alison, giving the ‘classic’ 109 profile.

    http://wp.scn.ru/en/ww3/f/406/24/0

    in reply to: RAF Swanton Morley in the late 1960s (Revived thread) #884421
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I f you like this sort of thread, go to the Vintage & Classic Light Aircraft group on Facebook, which is stuffed with this sort of content, and plenty of the old lags from here 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 826 through 840 (of 3,488 total)