It makes me furious when I see the Mosquito. I turn green and yellow with envy. The British, who can afford aluminum better than we can, knock together a beautiful wooden aircraft that every piano factory over there is building, and they give it a speed which they have now increased yet again. What do you make of that? There is nothing the British do not have. They have the geniuses and we have the nincompoops. After the war is over I’m going to buy a British radio set – then at least I’ll own something that has always worked.
A bit of background.
”The pilot was taking off on Runway 24 at Netherthorpe, which is grass and has a Take
Off Run Available (TORA) of 490 m. The pilot states that the wind was from 200º at 4 kt,
although other observers estimated that the wind strength was closer to 10 kt. The aircraft
became airborne just after the Runway 18/36 intersection (about ⅓ of its length) and started
to climb away. The pilot reported that at a height of about 12 ft, a gust of wind from the left
caused the aircraft to roll to the right and the right wingtip struck the ground. It ‘cartwheeled’
and came to rest in a field some 20 yards to the right of the runway. Despite severe damage
to the aircraft, the pilot, who suffered only minor injury, was able to evacuate through a hole
in the lower fuselage made when the wings had detached.”
http://www.aaib.gov.uk/cms_resources.cfm?file=/Taylor%20Titch,%20G-BABE%2005-14.pdf
Can anyone help or is there nothing survives ??
” (cn 25620/14175) Still in the colours of former owner Martin Baker, with whom she was based at Chalgrove as company transport from 1958, this Dak served Air Atlantique between 1981 and 1984, then going into storage at Coventry. B/u 9.98. The nose was reportedly shipped to Kuwait for a restaurant, and by 2007 the rear fuselage still survived at the Pinewood Studios in Iver Heath, UK.”
One of the recent Bond films had a DC-3 sequence, so maybe for that.
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?regsearch=G-APML
There is a new ”wrecks and Relics” out this week. maybe that might help you.
Bit dated, but nice pics here
The Daily Fail has finally caught up with the story. seems there have been two bids on E Bay for the Atlantic crossing.
The trouble with reading any of the DM’s content is the inevitable feelings of low-level despair for our society, induced by either the editorial content, the public comments, or more often both.
Big Nugget- ”The aircraft is not up to modern standard – it could be dangeros to fly that far in the thing > it should be bannet”
Here’s a link http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-27289499
Super Cub, I reckon. Rapide towing a banner seems rather overkill, not to mention expensive.
I think that it might be a dead one of these:-
[ATTACH=CONFIG]227976[/ATTACH]
That makes sense. A Havoc Turbinlite.
Just out of interest, how do you get on without radio comms ?
Or do you always fly in formation with another aircraft ?
I get on just fine, and a phone call will get you in most places. At the grassroots end, stripping etc, you don’t need a radio anyway.
Based 14 miles from Heathrow, I can amble over most of the south east, talking to nobody, keeping a good lookout, just as in the 1930’s- Remarkable really !
The Storch is indeed bonkers! Slower than a Cub, and faster too…
[ATTACH=CONFIG]227967[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]227968[/ATTACH]
Being non-radio in the Cub. I tried to get away before ‘the pack’, but someone else had the same idea !
I felt like Terry Thomas in ‘Magnificent Men’ ” Buzz Orf !”
Thanks Peter, t’was nice and steady. You can be my wing man anytime…..
Ye Gods and I thought the BBC were bad at misidentifying aircraft
It is fraudulent for such people to broadcast this sort of material as ‘news.
In an age where information is easier and quicker than ever to access, the integrity of these broadcasters plumbs new depths.
Everything is conjecture until a factual report is released.
Cessna above Hawker is a much less hazardous scenario, but …………. who knows ? Very sad, whatever the circumstances.
This report describes one aeroplane underneath the other. High wing Cessna, low wing Sea Fury equals no vision by either pilot.
It should NEVER be allowed to happen, and is VERY uncomfortable if it does, as I know from experience.
DC3 C-FTGI currently heading NNw to SSE passing Reading at 15000 feet on Flight Radar 24.
Interesting apendages on the aircraft too.
”
C-FTGI is owned by Bell Geospace (based in Houston, Texas and in Aberdeen, Scotland) and operated worldwide by a Canadian operator. C-FTGI is a Basler BT-67, originally a DC-3 built in 1944 but modified and modernized by Basler Turbo in 2008. The aircraft is configured for exploration geophysical survey work with a permanently installed Full Tensor Gravity Gradiometer (FTG) manufactured by Lockheed Martin.
The FTG is entirely passive i.e. it does not produce any emissions apart from those associated with normal electrical power usage. The system is powered continuously and therefore requires reliable mains power (120V or 240V) while the aircraft is parked.
Survey flights are conducted at low-level (nominally 80m above ground) by two pilots and one or two survey technicians. Because the equipment is sensitive to turbulence sorties are, depending on weather conditions, generally flown in calm conditions in the early morning and/or late afternoon amounting to 4-8 hours per day.”
http://www.aerocanada.com/bt-67/c-ftgi/Airborne%20Survey%20Aircraft%20BT-67%20C-FTGI.htm
What about Rissy!
Now, where on earth did I put my Wellingtons ?
Look at all the Lancs at Kemble, and a Wellington on finals for 27.