What a day! One up … one down…..
This looks very like ARC in another hat, ie Aerial Collective. Whatever the adiministrative arrangements, the opportunities they offer are unrivalled.
”Power and speed, two things the Sea Fury has in abundance. With one of the fastest piston engines ever built, this fighter aircraft is a force to be reckoned with. Experiencing this incredible machine first hand used to be only possible from the ground, watching as it soared through the skies at displays. But now you have the chance to experience this wonderful warbird first hand, as you fly in a Sea Fury with Aerial Collective.
We operate a Hawker Sea Fury T20 which is taken care of by the Aircraft Restoration Company. You can read more about its story below or discover our unique range of flight experiences here.
https://www.aerialcollective.co.uk/aircraft/fly-in-the-sea-fury/
Jolly good ! That has just saved me £2,750…..
The RAF PR blurb suggested to me it was a solo Tornado. Shame, a three-ship would look much better.
UKAR currently give you a taste of the mud-slinging. http://forums.airshows.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=50225&start=350
Long -term projects relying on volunteer labour often seem to hit the buffers like this. There are frequently differences in opinion on the best way forward, which ends up with factions pulling in oposite directions, such that the group becomes more about the squabling then restoring, but it is hard, and devisive to fire volunteers.
In a commercialy funded project, you have a boss who selects and pays people according to what skills/experience they bring with them . More important, they readily have the means to jettison those who represent an obstacle to progress.
It is unlikely a volunteer group could ever have got the Vulcan flying, but there are notable exceptions, like the Northern Aeroplane Workshops who built three wonderful historic aircraft, over many years.
I am sure that ‘ protect the aeroplane’ is a factor, yes, and it is this mindset which I feel may be disrupting a simpler, probably more damaging, but ultimately safer regime of simply presenting the aeroplane to the ground in a level attitude, and moderate rate of descent.
As an addendum to thoughts discussed above, yesterday we heard of the very tragic fatal accident that befell a Luton Minor in Essex, the first ( yes, really ) fatality associated with the type since the prototype flew in the 1930’s.
It burned on impact, so either experienced a mid-air fire, or struck the ground hard enough to rupture the fuel tank, which would suggest loss of control. All of that will become clear when the AAIB publish their findings.
Whatever happened, it reinforces my conviction that it is time for a real campaign of teaching and education/ instruction to inculcate piloting habits by which control is not so readily, lost, nor indeed lives.
As mentioned by Scotavia, this forum is not for pilots per se, but I will approach the LAA, and see if there is scope for some focus on this issue.
I wonder how many other recreational pursuits discuss and digest death and injury with such regularity as private flyers.
It did ‘take Roger Peterson’ in a literal sense, but really the 21 year old’s poor decision making was arguably the cause of the crash. He had no instrument rating, and intended to make the 1.am flight under Visual flight rules, and took off into the path of a very significant snowstorm. For unknown reasons, the Met dept at the airport, who knew the storm was incoming, did not pass this info on to Peterson. He flew straight into it, quickly ‘lost the picture’ in attempting to fly on instruments, and crashed in a spiral dive ( the inevitable flight path always seen in in such VMC to IMC crashes) . They all died barely 5 minutes after take off.
There are parallels with the recent loss of footballer Sala, essentially undertaking a hazardous flight, and quickly becoming overwhelmed by conditions beyond the capability of the pilot.
There are some differences, in that Sala had the arrangements put in place by an agent, whilst Buddy Holly personally set up the flight, having grown weary of the freezing and unreliable tour bus, and having had no clean clothes for three days.
http://data.desmoinesregister.com/holly/documents/CABreport.pdf Civil Aeronautics Board Report
Oh, the irony.
For people with no particular knowledge of aircraft or the RAF, it seems to offer a more engaging, more interesting and more fun experience than ‘the old’ Hendon.
For historians and aeroplane enthusiasts, we have probably lost more than we have gained, and some old favourites, like the Defiant and Wellington are now off site ( though for good reason) . The wrecked Hurricane in the dunes is missed, as well.
A dignified mauseleum of immaculately restored aircraft, nicely lit, and coherently grouped, would probably appeal to our membership, but to most of the public it would not mean very much. As the place is publicly funded, and the majority of visitors are not ‘aeronuts’ , it is hard to argue against a more ‘accesible’ presentation, and they have probably achieved much of what they aspired to.
It splits opinion, of course, but is still very well worth a visit, has some outstanding exhibits, and all FREE !
Two men aboard a 76-year-old plane were killed when it crashed Monday morning shortly after take-off, according to the Ohio State Highway Patrol.
Initial reports show the plane had engine issues, which may have caused the crash in Wayne County, about 60 miles south of Cleveland, the highway patrol said.
Brian Stoltzfus, 55, of Apple Creek, Ohio, was flying the Douglas DC-3 plane, and Curtis Wilkerson, 56, also from Apple Creek, was the co-pilot, the highway patrol said.
“It was a great airplane, and there are thousands still flying in remote parts of the world, but it is an antique,” Ganyard said.
A spokeswoman for the FAA initially said six people were aboard the plane and that four other passengers were injured, but the agency has since deferred to the Ohio’s highway patrol, which reported the two deaths.
The FAA and NTSB each said no investigators immediately would inspect the crash site because of the record-long government shutdown. The NTSB added that it would look into the incident once the government reopens.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/dead-hurt-plane-crash-ohio-faa/story?id=60523518
Depends how you define the start point. . If you phone up airframe assemblies and arrange delivery of a lot of already-fabricated components you are off to a flying start, and accelerated built time.
Not many ( manybe nobody ) get it done without significant contributions from the Spitfire ‘industry’. I suspect ARC could push one through in 12 months if the incentive (funding ) was there.
Errol, I think the inbedded PDF is restricted viewing . Any chance of a copy/paste to non-members. I am interested to read that.